MOH Forum: Prove God Exists and Get $1,000,000

Prove God Exists and Get $1,000,000

Posted By:
Lord Lucan
in somewhere strange
Jan 12, 2005

<a href="http://www.thinkandreason.com/" title="Think and Reason">Think and Reason</a> is offering $1,000,000 if you can<b> prove</b> that God exists. There are conditions attached. But they do say: <i>"All you have to do is prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that God exists. It is really that easy!"</i>

Is there really this money sitting waiting?

Supposing I said I was God - and prove I exist (should be easy) - is the money mine?

Category: Money, Religion; Replies: 1406

Comments

Page 10 of 24 pages ‹ First < 8 9 10 11 12 > Last ›
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 07:57 AM Scott said: "Can I get a little Fact on the universe starting with the big bang? "Also, can anyone suggest a currently excepted book that covers the start of the earth and evolution?" Hmm, are these the "facts" I'm supposed to respond to? First off, when did I EVER say I KNEW how the universe started? Go back and check; I never have. That's exactly the point. I don't know for sure how the universe started and neither do you. I'm just honest enough to admit that. As for the Big Bang Theory, do you see that word "theory" there? It's called a "theory" because it hasn't yet been proven definitively. I've never heard God referred to as a "theory" by any religious person, even though that is what the notion of God is, at best. Religious people always say they "know" there is a God, even though as some of you have admitted, there are NO facts to back that up. That's pretty arrogant.
Scott	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 09:40 AM Hi Cranky I was actually being serious when I was asking for a good book title. If you know one I would still like to know. If not I'll ask the book store. Let me know either way. ................... As you know the existance of God is proven by faith AND the belief that Jesus was on earth as a human as it was written in the Bible. I believe in the Bible because of (as I have stated before) history, archiology that persons, places and things happened as it written in the Bible. Does this mean that I have physical proof that God exists...I'll leave that up to you. But from the evidence that I have found I believe that there is a God. For you that isn't evidence enough. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND. The proof that there isn't - isn't proof that there is. As I see it. The concept of evolution is based on the big bang. the earth starting from nothing -> the big bang -> creatures developing from the primodial sludge -> insert millions of years -> and here we are. The issue I see here is this: As for the Big Bang Theory, do you see that word "theory" there? It's called a "theory" because it hasn't yet been proven definitively." Evolutionists base the origin of life on this theory and I have to learn it as if it were fact. My children with learn this theory. An unproven theory. Just like learning about God. Like an evolutionist I believe in a thing that I have not witnessed but evidence has pointed me to an understanding and exceptance that a God exists. Just like a evolutionist believes in the origin of life. You may not agree with why I believe there is a God and I can't get Him to shake your hand, but please admit that evolutionist have FAITH in things they have not seen and cannot prove.
Charybdis in Hell Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 10:09 AM First of all, your understanding of the cosmological timeline is a bit lacking. Please don't try to argue against the Big Bang until you at least gain a basic understanding of it. Second, and I repeat myself here, having faith in something for which there is NO evidence is not equivalent to having faith in something for which exists a lot of evidence. The Big Bang is a theory. There is an awful lot of evidence supporting this theory. It's not a perfect theory, and sometimes things are learned that require an adjustment to it, but that's science. Belief in God is also a theory. One for which no evidence exists. Christianity hasn't changed much in almost 2000 years. It's still stagnant and only accepts change when it's forced down it's throat, usually by science. The fact that there has never been any evidence for the existence of God hasn't seemed to affect the Church. In science, a theory for which no evidence exists is not generally accepted until such evidence can be found. Even today, there are many scientists that argue against M Theory and String Theory because there is no evidence for them. None. That's why science as a whole doesn't accept them. That is also why the burden of evidence lies with the people working on these theories. If they want others to accept them, then they have to provide the evidence for them. The same goes for religion. Personal belief means nothing. You have to provide evidence to back up that belief or there is no reason for anyone to believe as you do. If I don't have evidence to guide me, then how do I choose between all the unsupported beliefs out there? I might as well become a witch or a druid, or even join a competing religion, as become a Christian. None of them have any evidence supporting them. Since there is no difference in the validity of all these beliefs, I'll stick to science.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 11:03 AM "Evolutionists base the origin of life on this theory" This shows how little some people know about science. Science does not say evolution explains the orgin of life. Evolution is responsible for the diversity of life on earth. "As I see it. The concept of evolution is based on the big bang. the earth starting from nothing -> the big bang -> creatures developing from the primodial sludge -> insert millions of years -> and here we are." Another area of ignorance. Get the order of things right before you started arguing against them. The earth was formed long after the Big Bang, which happened 15 billion years ago, from material left over from the sun's creation. Earth is 4.7 billion years old. It took about 3-4 billion of those years for the simplest life forms to appear. Repeatable laboratory experiments have proved the primordial sludge can be produced in a very short time using basic ingredients available on earth 4 billion years ago and electric arcs to simulate lighting. Almost immediately a brown sludge starts appearing in the test tube. These are organic molecules, the building blocks of life. After that, it is just a matter of waiting a few billion years. This does not guarantee intelligent life or otherwise, only the possibility. In earth's case it happened or we would not be hear discussing it. For a good layman's explanation of this see Carl Sagan's book Cosmos. If your reading skills are lacking, watch the DVD series (available from Amazon.com) Also discussed is the evidence for the Big Bang.
Scott	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 11:12 AM Hi Guys thanks for the input. It is difficult because I see were you are coming from, but (there's always a but) I still believe in a God. But I do believe that science can show us a lot. I will check out the book Capt. Al. I have a better unnderstanding on evolution it is just that I am at work and an trying to write as quickly as possible. Take Care God Bless - LOL I've got some reading to do 😉
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 11:33 AM Anyone still having trouble visualizing the time scale we are talking about here? This is a one analogy: If the height of the Empire State Building represented the whole history of the earth (4.7 billion years), the amount of time humans have existed would be equivilent to the thickness of a postage stamp.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 02:05 PM Charybdis and Captain Al, I sure admire your facility with language. I'm not exactly illiterate myself, but you guys just put me to shame with how well you explain our side of things. Both your most recent postings explain things about as clearly as they can be explained. I'm just proud to be on the same side of the debate as you two. You're both great advocates for the side of reason.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 02:11 PM Scott said: "As you know the existance of God is proven by faith AND the belief that Jesus was on earth as a human as it was written in the Bible." No, I do NOT "know" that at all. I know you believers are going to get mad at me for trotting out, yet again, my Rules, but hey, what choice do you leave me? Rule Number Two: "The sincerity of your belief in God is NOT proof of the existence of God." Also, look! It's our old friend, Rule Number Three: "The fact that what you believe is written in a book or books is NOT proof of the existence of God." You keep repeating the same NON-proofs over and over again and I'll be forced to respond with the Rules. After all, as Rule Number Sixteen clearly states: "Repeating the same non-proof(s) over and over again is NOT proof of the existence of God." Oh, and before you tell me that I haven't proven that God DOESN'T exist, here's Rule Number One: "If you are asserting the existence of God, the burden of proof is on you. No one is required to prove the NON-existence of God."
lindsay	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 03:00 PM cranky, you always seem to treat believers as if their beliefs are idiotic. im not gonna go into it. if you cant see it then that sucks for you. good luck with ur debate. there is absolutely no point in me continuing with this especially since ive been ignored. i tried to make a point with the four articles i found, they explain things better than i could, and ppl never really adressed them. i find that pretty much retarded and frusterating. the way i see it w/e started off the universe had to have a will of some sort. but thats all explained in the article. byebye
Charybdis in Hell Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 04:44 PM Actually Cranky, you're much better at this than I am, it's just that I'm a bit more patient right now. My head hasn't been bloodied by bashing it against a wall time after time yet. That's kinda why I don't like getting into these discussions often as I know it just sucks all the life from you after a time. I'm not ready to become Cranky Charybdis quite yet. 😉 Additionally, you couldn't pay me enough to jump into the Lifewave or Sylvia Brown threads. Kudos to you and Captain Al for sticking with them.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 05:16 PM CMG, Thanks for the kind words and your list of rules. If it keeps going like this I may have to start using them. Like Chary says, sometimes it's like beating your head against the wall. It's even tougher because I'm on the road so my Internet access is sporadic and I don't have all my reference material at hand. Sorry to hear, but understand why Chary doesn't want to jump into the fight. I'd like to say we would then be even more convincing but that would violate Rule Number 5.
Carter S	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 05:25 PM Are you guys done with all of that lovy dovy stuff. Yeah you are all good debaters. Bravo! I have already commended you on that in the past. But here I'll put this: Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 05:46 PM Carter, I disagree. Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence. It's only one small piece but it IS evidence.
Charybdis in Hell Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 05:57 PM <i>Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence.</i> - Carter There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that I created the universe and all life within it. Does that mean I have a valid case if I claim to be God? Non-evidence seems to be all that's required for a believer.
Carter S	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 06:12 PM Charybdis, Well if you claim to be God, then show me some super natural powers. Ahh never mind then you would just say well absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. wouldn't you. Damn it. But I guess I can say that on other stuff. oh well I'll be back.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 \| 10:37 PM Carter, Why is it you demand evidence of supernatural power from Charybdis but none from God?
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 \| 03:14 AM Carter S said: "Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence." Actually, it may or may not be in a given situation. Know what, though? Absence of evidence is NEVER proof of existence.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 \| 03:30 AM Charybdis said: "Additionally, you couldn't pay me enough to jump into the Lifewave or Sylvia Brown threads. Kudos to you and Captain Al for sticking with them." You know, I'm foolish enough to go into those things time and time again thinking that they will pass soon. I've never been right yet so I don't know why I keep diving into the deep end. At least with LifeWave, I KNOW that the bubble will burst eventually and we'll be proven right. Sylvia is another story. When I was a wacky morning drive radio DJ back in the 80's in Allentown, PA, a stupid pyramid scheme known as the "Airplane" came through the area. I keep talking about how it was a fraud and would leave a lot of people minus the $2500 you were supposed to put into it. I got death threats over the phone and everything! I said that if the bubble didn't burst within 90 days, I would let the mayor shave my head in public. I wish I had a dollar for every person who told me they were going to laugh at me when I was bald! Well, you can guess the outcome. I didn't have to shave my head. If anything, I was giving myself a lot of leeway with the 90 day thing; I honestly didn't think it would take that long to crash. I just wanted to make SURE it would be over in the timeframe I picked. I guess the point is that I've been diving into nonsense like this for a long time now. Some people just don't learn, I guess.
lindsay	Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 \| 08:22 PM hehe al dont be silly you see carter has already claimed to have seen supernatural stuff from God. you no like talking to him, and i do believe that hes said that he has witnessed pretty cool stuff. i think that carter will attest to God's supernatural abilities. yeah i just came on here to recomend the movie left behind world at war. it was really good and even though must of you dont believe in the bible, the ones that do will appreciate it. and while im recomending things, i recomend listening too my wonderful friend allison because her voice is beautiful http://www.purevolume.com/allisondamery dont be alarmed if millions of ppl just VANISH hehe. no im not debating on that either. just saying it. cuz i dont want to debate on here anymore. just came to see if the debate was still going and to recomend that movie. carter good luck debating them alone lol it gets quite tiring. dont get discouraged. and dont be afriad to just quit. your faith doesnt have to stand trial. good luck to all of you and just because someone on here cant prove that God isnt real, doesnt mean that hes not real. i agree with what carter said about the whole evidense thing. sometimes, the facts just havent been found yet. byebye
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 \| 08:56 PM " al dont be silly you see carter has already claimed to have seen supernatural stuff from God. you no like talking to him, and i do believe that hes said that he has witnessed pretty cool stuff. i think that carter will attest to God's supernatural abilities" - lindsay Carter has said more than once he believes in God even though there is no evidence. So the question still stands. Why would he demand proof of supernatural powers from the god Charybdis but not from the Christian god?
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2005 \| 09:01 PM "carter good luck debating them alone lol it gets quite tiring. dont get discouraged. and dont be afriad to just quit. your faith doesnt have to stand trial" - lindsay Carter's faith is not on trial. We all know he sincerely believes. We are debating whether or not his god exists. So far he has not produced any evidence.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 \| 02:48 AM Lindsay said: "hehe al dont be silly you see carter has already claimed to have seen supernatural stuff from God." Lindsay, the key word in that sentence is "claimed." We have no idea what he actually saw. As I've said, millions of people have seen David Blaine "levitate." Trust me, he didn't defy gravity. There are people who are sincerely convinced that he did, however. Despite their sincerity, they are wrong. Sound familiar? "i think that carter will attest to God's supernatural abilities." Carter will certainly say with all sincerity that he's seen things he BELIVES attest to God's abilities. That doesn't prove that they do, of course. "yeah i just came on here to recomend the movie left behind world at war. it was really good and even though must of you dont believe in the bible, the ones that do will appreciate it." "dont be alarmed if millions of ppl just VANISH" I assume you're referring to the "Rapture." Tell you what, why don't you pick a date you're sure the Rapture will occur prior to. Let's draw up an agreement that I get all your stuff on that date. Remember, you're picking a date that you're sure is well AFTER the Rapture, so you have nothing to lose, right? If you're right, you'll be in Heaven and won't need your stuff. If I'm right, you'll be right here on Earth with the rest of us, but I'll own all your stuff because this would be a legally-binding agreement. So, just how much faith do you have?? "hehe. no im not debating on that either. just saying it. cuz i dont want to debate on here anymore." No need for debate. If you honestly believe you're going to fly up in the air, you won't need any of your stuff, so why not just sign it over to me? Remember, YOU pick the date so there's no trick to this.
Carter S	Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 \| 12:55 PM Cranky Media Guy, "Actually, it may or may not be in a given situation. Know what, though? Absence of evidence is NEVER proof of existence." Just trying to help people think. But I still believe it.(absence of evidence is not evidence of absence) But Absence of evidence is never proof of existence, is right too. There is no evidence, but It is still my belief that I choose to go by. "Rapture." Is that suppose to be armageddon?(ri-spelling?) Thanks Lindsay, I will probably stop with this website though, even though I have said that in the past, but I will. Soon.It is a waste of time to even debate this for so long with people you know aren't going to convince. I guess I'll never learn. It is tiring. But it's their belief and I respect that. Your friends voice is great! Give her a thumbs up for me. Bye.
Citizen Premier in spite of public outcry Member	Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 \| 07:48 PM My goodness, is this business still going on?
lindsay	Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 \| 08:41 PM "I assume you're referring to the "Rapture." Tell you what, why don't you pick a date you're sure the Rapture will occur prior to. Let's draw up an agreement that I get all your stuff on that date. Remember, you're picking a date that you're sure is well AFTER the Rapture, so you have nothing to lose, right?" wow that was stupid no offense. you see, christians believe that the date of the rapture is a mystery. i could make guesses, but i wouldnt bet anything on them being right. carter- lol i no her voice is wonderful. shell appreciate the thumbs up. its amazing, so many of my friends have amazing voices like that or the same talent with intstruments. it makes me happy. yep, im not even gonna look at this site again. cuz its kinda addictive after a while lol and i want to quit good luck to all of you wish that we could speak more in a normal convo, but i dont talk to anyone in a serious conversation unless ive met them in real life lol. kinda learned from that hehe. which sucks. cuz alot of you would be fun ppl to talk to byebyebyebyebyebye have a beautiful, blessed life! <3
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 \| 12:24 AM Lindsay said: "wow that was stupid no offense. you see, christians believe that the date of the rapture is a mystery. i could make guesses, but i wouldnt bet anything on them being right." Well, isn't that convenient? You believers ask we non-believers to bet our brains on the existence of something (God) for which there is no proof but you won't back up your beliefs at all. Funny, I keep hearing guys like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell saying that the Rapture is coming any time now. According to you, though, a Christian believes that when the Rapture will come is unknown. Why, it's almost as if Robertson and Falwell are just trying to scare people or something. So, do you or don't you believe that the Rapture is coming in the next 10 years?
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 \| 12:34 AM Carter S said: "Rapture." Is that suppose to be armageddon?(ri-spelling?)" Well, if I'm not incorrect, I believe that they are related. The Rapture is the deal with the Believers will fly up into the air to hang out with God and the Heathens (like me) will walk the Earth, sulking. Not all Christians sects believe in the Rapture, by the way. You guys really need to get your story straight. 😊
Carter	Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 \| 09:37 AM Oh, Yeah I didn't really know what that meant. I really have no specific religion. I respect all of them. I am use to hearing "the second coming" that's what the mormons call it.(Utah is covered with them) I don't know when it will happen or if it even will. But I am not going to worry about it. I'll just live my life the best I can. And if it is all wrong. Then I guess I am going to hell for having my own beliefs.
Charybdis in Hell Member	Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 \| 10:38 AM Why would you worship a god that would send you to Hell for not having the exact set of beliefs that he wants? Obviously he hasn't been too precise on this or there wouldn't be all this disagreement and splintering of the Church. Basically, you're accepting a god who tells you to "Pick a religion, any religion. Guess right and you go to Heaven, guess wrong and it's Hell for you, bub."
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 \| 02:15 PM Charybdis said: "Why would you worship a god that would send you to Hell for not having the exact set of beliefs that he wants? Obviously he hasn't been too precise on this or there wouldn't be all this disagreement and splintering of the Church. Basically, you're accepting a god who tells you to "Pick a religion, any religion. Guess right and you go to Heaven, guess wrong and it's Hell for you, bub." I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, that you could even ask such a question! It's OBVIOUS that God is just testing our "free will." Or something. I DO like your description of God. It makes Him sound like a carnival game operator. Hmm, come to think of it...
J	Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 \| 06:24 PM I'm almost 20 years old, and I've always debated the existence of God. Learning about Objectivism brought me to a firm belief that God did not exist, that Man is what he is by the works of Man, yet that does not explain how we came to be. Evolution is inaccurate, and faith unsupported by science lacks reason. Recent research has led me to believe that we are the product of intelligent design. For well-detailed arguments, I suggest visiting http://www.godandscience.org - this website is the best I've found in years. I only found it recently, and have had a hard time concentrating on anything else. Whatever. If God exists, he will judge us, and if not, my grave will be no darker than yours. Though I do not practice the belief in Jesus or God, does not mean that I will remain blind and without question. I just need time and reason.
K	Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 \| 06:40 PM Oh yeah. Lindsay is not the beacon of light and truth for Christianity. The teachings of Jesus and/or the Bible state that slander is a sin. Love your friends and love your enemies. Yeah. There's a lot more I could argue, but I don't even know which side I'm on.
Carter S	Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 \| 11:16 AM Charybdis said: "Why would you worship a god that would send you to Hell for not having the exact set of beliefs that he wants? Obviously he hasn't been too precise on this or there wouldn't be all this disagreement and splintering of the Church. Basically, you're accepting a god who tells you to "Pick a religion, any religion. Guess right and you go to Heaven, guess wrong and it's Hell for you, bub." Yeah, I actually Don't believe in hell, I just used that as an example. But that's what I believe. Cranky- Oh yeah I think we're done with the free will thing.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 \| 02:45 PM Carter S said: "Cranky- Oh yeah I think we're done with the free will thing." Oh, I wasn't reviving it; I was ridiculing it. Besides, given that Christians have been using this silly argument for ages, I'm sure it will rear its ugly head again in the not-too-distant future.
Carter S	Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 \| 06:58 PM Cranky Media Guy, Whatever, I have free will and....Crap! It just happened. (I knew you were ridiculing it) (I had nothing else to say) :coolhmm:
jeff jones	Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 \| 09:53 PM i have proof of god that you can see do you have ph,that i can call,this in not a joke,it is real
Carter S	Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 \| 11:32 PM Jeff Jones, Yeah, call 1-800-jenny05.(jenny craig) thanks.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 \| 02:35 PM Jeff Jones should call 911, and ask for an ambulance.
Carter S	Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 \| 05:13 PM Captain Al, WOW, I agree with you on something!!!
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 08:26 AM We agree? That's scary. Aren't you just a little curious to see what proof Jeff Jones has to offer?
carter	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 11:36 AM Captain Al, Well it is Halloween and all. Jeff Jones is probably not a regular, so His entries dont matter to me. He is probably like that one girl on the sylvia forum. Roxy. I do want some proof that his name is Jeff Jones. J/K
lindsay	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 03:36 PM hehe halloween i dont like halloween im so bored... oh yeah cranky. i said that we can guess . i think that the rapture will be in this generation. but thats my opinion. go talk to someone who studies the end times if you want a good hypothesis. but then that would still be the judgement of people. yeah anyway. im not debating on this again. im just super bored cuz its halloween so no one is home and im stuck babysitting... "Oh yeah. Lindsay is not the beacon of light and truth for Christianity." wow what? who one earth claimed that i was? how did i get drug into this. im not even debating anymore. k, i agree with you. im definetly not...
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 04:25 PM Hey, check this out. A preacher in Texas was <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4394722.stm">killed while performing a baptism</a>. Seems he was standing in a small pool and reached out to touch a microphone. Then ZOT! Damn that free will.
Carter S	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 09:46 PM HMMM.... Sounds like it was his time to go. That sucks though. I mean OUCH! Well it is very sad, but at least he died doing what he believed in, and enjoyed. Lindsay, Yeah, I hate halloween too. It is very boring. I just got this 25 yr guy who came to my door. He was by himself trick or treating.(what the f**k!) He was Freddy Kreuger with no mask. I got a laugh out of it. But I guess that's how he rolls. The only fun thing about Halloween is the parties and clubs. Everyone gets dressed up. I was going to go to a club, and some parties but I didn't want to leave my mommy alone on halloween.(my friends called me a square so I punched them n the face)J/K. But yeah even the parties and club get a little boring after about an hour or so. People just need to get CRAZIER! WOOOOO! But anywho. I just told Cranky that I am finished with this site. So Captain Al, it has been real, Good luck with everything. No hard feelings dude. Lindsay, You too, but I don't know if you will see this. But it has been a pleasure to be on your side. I wish the best for you, and your friend with the great voice (hope she goes BIG TIME), and your family, and your house, and tree, and shoes and/or shoe. Anyway, Good luck! ROAST BEEEEEEF!!!! Gotta go powder my face and biceps for no reason at all. J/K, But seriousry, I do. J/K.. no Im not. But I do have to go draw on Mr. James Randi's picture. I can't believe you guys missed my parties. I had NO party cups. I had to drink out of my hand, AND dog dishes! Thanks to Captain Al, whom I left in charge of the cups. DAMMNN IT! Keep it real you guys!! CARTER "Freakin" S.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 10:14 PM Hey you can't go. Who are we gonna abuse now?
Carter S	Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 \| 10:35 PM In that case I guess I'll stay. Hmm I didn't realize I was being abused. I thought I was being hugged by some very old people.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 \| 01:33 AM Carter S said: "But anywho. I just told Cranky that I am finished with this site. So Captain Al, it has been real, Good luck with everything. No hard feelings dude. But but, who's going to keep those nasty Negroes in Louisiana in line?
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 \| 01:42 AM Captain Al said: "A preacher in Texas was killed while performing a baptism. Seems he was standing in a small pool and reached out to touch a microphone. Then ZOT! Damn that free will." Why does God hate Southern Baptists?? Hey, Cap, have you seen whydoesgodhateamputees.com yet? It's really good.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 \| 01:47 AM lindsay said: "oh yeah cranky. i said that we can guess . i think that the rapture will be in this generation. but thats my opinion. go talk to someone who studies the end times if you want a good hypothesis. but then that would still be the judgement of people." How, exactly, does one "study the End Times?" Are you aware that some Christians have been predicting the End Times for centuries now? So far, nada. You may want to do some research into the Millennial movement. The track record of those who predict the end of humanity is kind of embarassing; I don't see any reason to believe that new predictions will be any more accurate than earlier ones. Everyone wants to think that they will be around to see the Big Event, therefore their life will have some meaning. I'm not buying it.
Carter S	Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 \| 05:14 PM Cranky Media Guy, "But but, who's going to keep those nasty Negroes in Louisiana in line?" OK way out of line. I am not racist. I have many, actually about ten Black friends and they agree with that article as well. That doesn't make us racist. But anywho, Later. Take it easy. Hang ten. I am OUT!
Carter S	Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 \| 06:23 PM 600!! Now I am out!
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 \| 01:37 AM Carter, I'm still wondering about all those white people from Florida I've been seeing on my TV lately who are bitching about the response (or lack thereof) from the government to the hurricane. I guess they're all lazy welfare Queens and Kings.
Joey	Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 \| 07:15 PM well, screw that i cant get the million i guess there are just things you cant understand, like how old barbra walters really is, and of course if oprah has a cock or not check this, maybe ifthe whole world says "fuck off god" at the same time he will implode and the sky will rain liitle pieces of holy body, then we can all take a bit and prove god EXISTED. HAHAHAHA
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 \| 11:08 PM Want to understand the logic behind religion? Just read <a href="http://www.jhuger.com/kisshank.php">Kissing Hank's Ass</a>
Carter S	Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 \| 11:33 PM This is my last entry, Again I apologize for the other forum. But anyway, you know how you say "you can't prove a negative". Well how about this? Prove yourself right Prove that your theory of Gods non-existence is right. Prove it to us believers that your view is right. We have to prove our view right, Shouldn't you. You say no one has to disprove anything, Well if your claiming that you know that there is no proof of god, then prove that your theories are right. The burden of proof is on you to prove to us that your theories on God is correct. Just prove to us that you're right. That's all. I mean us believers can't prove it, then shouldn't you be able to prove your theory right? Hey, can any of you prove that you can never prove a negative? If yes, then you've proved a negative. If no, then any negative you come across might actually be provable. And what about there is no largest prime number? That's negative and proved. Am I not right? I am standing with my belief, And am still going to say this: Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence. Thank you. Cranky Said: Carter, I'm still wondering about all those white people from Florida I've been seeing on my TV lately who are bitching about the response (or lack thereof) from the government to the hurricane. I guess they're all lazy welfare Queens and Kings All I am going to say is, that is some good satire.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 \| 03:27 AM Carter S said: "Prove yourself right Prove that your theory of Gods non-existence is right. Prove it to us believers that your view is right. We have to prove our view right, Shouldn't you. You say no one has to disprove anything, Well if your claiming that you know that there is no proof of god, then prove that your theories are right. The burden of proof is on you to prove to us that your theories on God is correct." Carter, Carter, Carter. Do I REALLY have to quote from my Rules again? I guess so. sigh Rule Number One: "If you are asserting the existence of God, the burden of proof is on you. No one is required to prove the NON-existence of God." Rule Number Sixteen: "Repeating the same non-proof(s) over and over again is NOT proof of the existence of God." Lastly, Rule Number Seventeen: "The fact that you think you have found a loophole in these rules is NOT proof of the existence of God." Nice try, though. NEXT!
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 \| 11:13 AM If anyone thinks US President G.W. Bush is firmly on the side of Intelligent Design, think again. The <a href="http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN05/wn110405.html">latest report</a> from <a href="http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/index.html">What's New</a> by <a href="http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/bob.html">Bob Park</a> tells us Bush will ask Congress for $7.1 billion to fight the spreading of avian flu. Park reports: "Although a virulent strain of bird flu has killed at least 62 people in Asia, there have been no confirmed cases of human-to-human transmission. The fear is that the H5N1 virus will mutate (evolve) making that possible. Does this mean that Mr. Bush has changed his mind on evolution?" This is the same George Bush Jr., you will remember, who thinks America should send men to Mars and at the same time is trying to set science back 2000 years by supporting the concept of Intelligent Design.
Cranky Media Guy	Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 \| 12:19 AM Carter S said: "Cranky Said: Carter, I'm still wondering about all those white people from Florida I've been seeing on my TV lately who are bitching about the response (or lack thereof) from the government to the hurricane. I guess they're all lazy welfare Queens and Kings All I am going to say is, that is some good satire." Well, you singled out black people from Louisiana as being particularly critical of the Bush people over the lack of response to Katrina. I was merely pointing out that there are a lot of Caucasians who don't seem to be all that thrilled with the Feds' response to Wilma. Kind of knocks that whole "blacks are whiny" thing out, doesn't it?
spooner	Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 \| 05:21 PM http://www.proofofgod.org. Really not proof, but it's something to think about. Or search on google and they will have some good links.
Captain Al in Vancouver Island, Canada Member	Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 \| 07:32 PM "Really not proof, but it's something to think about." A website UNDER CONSTRUCTION is something to think about? You're right, it's really not proof.
Page 10 of 24 pages ‹ First < 8 9 10 11 12 > Last ›

Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.