Woman Claims To Be Descendant of Jesus Christ (And Gets Huge Book Deal) —
Status: Clever marketing scheme
Kathleen McGowan claims to be a descendant of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. That belief would make her no different than all the other people in this world suffering from delusions of grandeur, except that she's managed to leverage her extraordinary claim of ancestry
into a major book deal. Simon & Schuster will soon be publishing her novel,
The Expected One, with a print-run of 250,000 copies. The book is a loose fictionalization of her claim. She wanted to publish it as nonfiction but explains that she couldn't do so because "she couldn't make public the sources she developed while researching and writing her book."
Many might view McGowan's novel and ancestry claim as an extraordinarily brazen
Da Vinci Code rip-off. But not so, she says. And she's quite right. I think it's actually a
Holy Blood, Holy Grail rip-off (as was the
Da Vinci Code itself). And I have to hand it to her that it is a clever way to cash in on the religious thriller mania that
Holy Blood, Holy Grail and the
Da Vinci Code have inspired.
As proof of her ancestry, McGowan says that she's had visions of Mary Magdalene. She also claims to have genealogical records passed down through her family during the past two thousand years. But, of course, she's not sharing these documents with anyone.
What I find interesting (though not surprising) are the comments in support of her ancestry claim from the editor-in-chief of Touchstone and her literary agent. Her editor says,
"Yes, I believe her. Her passion and her mission are so strong, how can she not be?"
And her agent says,
"She spent 20 years of her life researching this subject. You have to give her any benefit of the doubt because she's totally rational. I believe her absolutely. She had total credibility with me from the very beginning."
In other words, her editor and agent seem to be arguing that as long as someone is fanatical enough about what they claim, then they must be right, even if they offer no evidence to support what they're saying. Unfortunately, most of the people in the world probably would agree with this sentiment.