|
Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First < 2 3 4 |
Esme
|
Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 | 08:09 AM
More people need to find this forum. =\ |
Burmess
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 | 09:14 AM
IMHO. This whole matter was probably created by John Lennon. After hearing from people in the know that John was extremely abusive to his first wife, from his son on an interview the same and watching him on a rare interview where he doesn't look like he combed his hair in 3 months verbally abusing Yoko, I came to the conclusion that the possibility of him being a severely deranged genious could be possible. All the clues are to be found on albums or sound tracks. These photos can be manufactured and changed, even back then. No wonder The Beatles broke up. If John was threatening me as I hear and see, I would leave too. |
Rob
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 | 11:00 PM
Well, let's see... We've had someone from MFH trying to--as it were--fit a square peg into a round hole. It doesn't work, the heads of the two men don't match up, and their bodies are different!
So then we had Esme and Debater who basically told us that if something looks a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck--it absolutely, positively cannot be anything other than a pigeon! And you even go a bit farther and say that a pigeon can even turn into a duck or vice-versa--or at least some of it's body parts can change from duck to bird parts or bird to duck parts!
You've been so brainwashed it's not even funny! I've said it before and I'll say it again, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to see the two men are DIFFERENT!
Appearantly some of you people were deprived of Sesame Street when you were younger, but they had (still have) a segment on differences where they show four boxes. Typically, in the each of the boxes are things that are related, but one of the things in one of the boxes is not like the others. They then ask you to tell which one is different. This is a good exercise for cognitive developement in young children. I would suggest you have your mommy help you to learn about similarities differences.
http://www.sesameworkshop.org/sesamestreet/games/play.php?contentId=3971
A lot of people have suggested the Beatles did it as a joke and to increase sales. Well, even with half a mind to think about it, it is an extremely ludicrous argument.
Why the hell would they joke about death?specifically concerning one of their bandmates? Where is the precident? Did they joke about Stuart Sutcliff's death? Did they joke about Brian Epstein's death? Did they joke about people close to them like John's mom Julia or Paul's mom Mary? Did they joke about the death of any other singers like Buddy Holly or Otis Redding?
Why the would they Beatles resort to a gimmick to try and make more money? They were already the top grossing band in the world at the time, so money really wasn't an issue.
You can appreciate the musicianship of both persons without having to try and mold them into one body. By the way, the clues (whether purposefull or not), have continued on in the solo albums--you just have to LOOK and LISTEN. |
Sweet Alyssa
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 | 01:12 AM
hey this is the debater.
changin' names because the debater just seems stupid...sooo rawr.
any who yeah sure you think he's dead.
And yes i know you think it' easy to tell between the two but gues what!!!
If it were so easy then this shit would have been over LONG before i was born.
Also don't get all "YOUR STUPID YOUR STUPID AND DON'T FORGET YOU ARE STUPID" attitude.
Seriously not needed and it makes you look like even more of an ass.
Also the clues I think is just a bunch of bullshit.
People thought it be cool to play them backwards and they "made" messages out of them.
I even listened to when they sayed that John supposedly said "I buried Paul"
And I listen well.
Music is my life literally and he said cranberry sauce....no joke.
sooo yeah.
I really don't care an you can try to change my mind all ya want.
By the way WTF do some beatles fan think he's dead???
I mean come on!!!
WHY WOULD YOU WANT TO THINK THAT HE'S DEAD?!?!?
>:[[[[[ |
Esme
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 | 11:15 AM
I find your attempts at insult hilarious. I'm very aware of cognitive development in children as I teach for a living and have a young daughter. No one said they did it to make more money. They were still very young at the time and could have just done it for fun.
"Why the hell would they joke about death?"
They never once said, "Paul is dead." What is that question based on, Rob? I'm still not convinced.
By the way...
glad you're back, Rob. =P |
Sweet Alyssa.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 | 10:05 PM
Yeah w/e.
I know that was kinda childish but It's like come it's obvious that he's not dead.
Get it through your head.
Sooo yeah.
That's it.
Have a nice day.
;] |
Big fan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 | 09:29 PM
Hi there....i'm rather late to join. But here goes...Been a Beatle's fan since they first were popular. I had a total crush on Paul when i was a kid. I personally think the whole paul is dead thing is an elaborate and amazing piece of urban legend.Really...think about it.... I agree, how could any imposter fill the role of the multi-talented, handsome Paul so amazingly well? It seems darn unlikely doesn't it. And to do it all left handed as well??? Play the bass left-handed? The acoustic? Sign autographs? And that voice.....it is sooo distinct. I also agree with the whole family thing.....really wouldn't they kind of notice???. Also, there are photos of john and paul in later years....ie White Album, where they are sharing laughs and looking very much like close old friends. Could that happen with an imposter??? I think Paul is Paul. True, sometimes he looks taller, or his head looks bigger.....but photos are like that. Try and find two of yourself where you look exacltly the same. Yet.....i know when this all first came out, i was truly shocked. Everyone was kind of blown away by it but most people i knew thought it was a load of crap.i actually played Revolution #9 backwards and the "turn me on dead man" thing was truly sketchy. I listened to all the clues....most were sketchy or had other explanations. I think there was something that kicked off the rumor and then people just kept elaborating and elaborating turning it into one of the biggest hoaxes of the century. I choose to look at it that way because it really is too painful to think that paul might have been killed so horrifically, and that someone stole his identity and has been living off it ever since. |
Sweet Alyssa
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 | 01:19 PM
THANK YOU!!!!!
FINALLY!!!
HAHA!!!
>.< |
Rob
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 | 08:43 PM
Hi there....i'm rather late to join. But here goes...Been a Beatle's fan since they first were popular. I had a total crush on Paul when i was a kid. I personally think people who think the whole paul is dead thing is a hoax are building an elaborate and amazing piece of urban legend. Really...think about it.... Doubters make excuses about Paul being dead by trying to explain away that no imposter could possibly fill the role of the multi-talented, handsome Paul so amazingly well? To them it seems darn unlikely? And to do it all left handed as well??? No one could learn to play bass left-handed--they say? Or acoustic--they say? Sign autographs--they say? And that voice of Paul's sooo distinct, no one could imitate, but of course the doubters refuse to listen to the records too... Besides to the doubters who are hearing impaired, it it all sounds the same anyway. And the doubters bring up the family and say wouldn't they kind of notice (of course they'll completely disregard two family photos where there are two completely different men who are supposed to be "Paul")???. Also, the doubters point out there are photos of john and paul in later years....ie White Album, where they are sharing laughs and looking very much like close old friends (although this not really evidence enough though of the same old two friends--maybe they're just having a moment of laughter?). Doubters ask if that could that happen with an imposter, but they've never heard of acting??? I think Paul is Paul--of course Paul is Paul, he was always Paul, but if we are talking about the replacement that has imitated as Paul since 1967, he has never really made himself Paul--just a good impersonator). Doubters will admit that the "Paul" looks taller, or his head looks bigger.....And if you take two photos of yourself, is it really that difficult to tell it's the same person? Yet.....i know when this all first came out, i was truly shocked. Everyone was kind of blown away by it but most people i knew thought it was a load of crap.i actually played Revolution #9 backwards and the "turn me on dead man" thing was truly sketchy. I listened to all the clues....most were sketchy or had other explanations. I think there was something that kicked off the rumor and then doubters have just been trying to find a way to squash the rumor by elaborating and elaborating turning it into one of the biggest hoaxes of the century. Doubters choose to look at it that way because it is really is too painful to think that Paul might actually be dead, and that someone stole his identity and has been living off it ever since. |
Rob
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 | 08:45 PM
Esme, the remaining Beatles repeatedly stated that Paul was dead--literally and metaphorically--you just never, ever listened to them. |
Ana
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 | 10:17 AM
Hi, I'm a female who also had a crush on Paul when I was 13 y.o. He was then the leader of "Wings" with her wife Linda and Denny (Penny) Laine. "London Town" was my preferred album. I discovered "The Beatles" little by little because there was a second beatlemania in the world at this time. Their music was incredible to me... Their voices, the lyrics, everything... Paul's voice was definitely the best I've ever heard in pop music. His voice is the proof he is the same man I was in love with. Noone can fake his voice. I guess I am still a bit in love. 😉 |
Esme
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 | 11:38 AM
Rob, it was a dj in Detroit who announced that Paul is dead. None of the band members ever *seriously* stated that Paul is dead. |
number1fan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 | 02:03 AM
he is not dead. He is really alive. and rita who was supposed to have made the car crash in the song says lovely rita |
Whitehorse
|
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 | 02:38 PM
Wow nice to see your site...i have been getting so much crap from pseudo Beatle fans telling me I am crazy and out of my mind for thinking Paul McCartney died in Nov 1966... I think he was killed so the powers that be could take over the most powerful rock band in history. |
Youreallcrazy
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 | 12:02 AM
Seriously... SERIOUSLY? People sit on a forum.... for months at a time to argue if some guy they don't even know is dead?? Who the hell really cares if the real guy died? I mean. You're getting the music you wanted... it still made history... they still got their money... Are you really that broken up about things that may or may not have happened??
And the "machine" just wanting to take over the most "POWERFUL ROCK BAND IN THE WORLD"... what the hell do you think rockbands are going to accomplish with the world so that some political mastermind would want to 'OVER TAKE' them... really. Get a life, people. |
Jasmine
|
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 | 10:30 PM
i see some very good arguments, especially made by Rob, but i suppose i PERSONALLY need proof. haha, i know proof can't be given to every single person out there who doesn't believe it, but you could tell me the fingerprint's didn't match up, but it doesn't mean it's true. aaany body can say aaanything and say it's been proven, but you'll never know if it actually was. i haven't seen any ACTUAL proof of the fingerprints having cahnged other then the fact that people have simple posted it on the internet. how does any body know it's actually true?
(i used the fingerprint argument because it is the most convincing of them all. actually, the only convincing one.)
the whole conspiracy is completely NUTS in some aspects. i mean, some people come up with the most ridiculous things.
P.S.
even if the real Paul McCartney died, this replacement is DAMN good! he wrote some beeeautiful songs! Hey Jude and Let it Be being my favourite post 1966 songs of his. he's either the best double in the world or the real Paul. either way turned out good, really. 😊 |
Esme
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 | 08:20 AM
Well said, Jasmine! =) |
yahpete
Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 07:16 AM
Never claim that paul is alive or you could be banned. |
yahpete
Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 07:19 AM
You need DNA comparisons and dental comparisons to prove that someone is an imposter. I suppose that I will be banned from this forum also for suggesting such a hideous slant. |
yahpete
Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 07:26 AM
'Paul is dead people' are fanatics who are looking for a cause which does not exist. They have no scientific evidence of his death and replacement and need to get out more to have fun. Leave Macca alone. He has had a long busy tragic life. |
papadave
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 | 08:23 AM
Paul is Dead...this is what this site is about...not to convince people that never did any research...can we send the Master Debater on his way?...no clue, no research, he is clutter to those seeking the truth...do your research Debater and catch up with us then comment ...otherwise go away... Om Love Light Paul is so dead...
Sir faul is a clever New World Order trickster up to NO GOOD!!! Ripped off our beloved Paul McCartney. |
Esme
|
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 | 10:16 AM
You could be a bit more respectful, Papa. The Debater strongly believes in what she has said here. Everyone has a right to voice his or her opinions on this forum. |
peter birbas
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 | 05:41 PM
this is scaring me the facts. i still havent tried lsd. shit man can any one help me if you can i am the no where man |
papadave
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 | 04:25 PM
Funny PIA people seem to call names and belittle people and that kind of thing while the PID people are looking for clues... PIA people usually don't have a clue... |
i will not say my real name
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 | 06:01 PM
OK people wtf(btw that stands for what the fudge)? paul is sooo alive ok you know how they were all flipping out because pon the abbey road cover paul's legs weren't in sync with all the others? well ok stand up what leg goes forward first huh? if you are right handed your left foot goes up first if you are left handed your right foot goes out first! my gym teavher tells me about. . . THE LAW OF OPPSITION DUH!!!!! ok seriously if a 12 year old can figure this out all you people are just terrible,ok and he was holding a ciggerete in his right hand. well seriously? DID HE SIGN A FRREAKING CONTRACT THAT SAYS HE HAS TO HOLD EVERYTHING WITH HIS LEFT HAND? in another album b4 the hoax he is holding it with his left hand explain that know you big moron, also how low can you get? you were all flipping out becauseof the color that they were wearing i mean really? wow some idiot must have put his/her heart and soul into reasearching all thsi crap i mean this is ovious stuff man. and the opd thing you can clearly freaking tell that the last letter is a frikin p. sorry if i offened anybody but like how could they say the hottest man of that era was dead? lol anyway maybe it is because he is my fav idk lol |
i ain't saying my name what you crazy?
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 | 06:05 PM
cram it papadave nobody cares what you think! leave paul aloneif you don't have anything nice to say then SHUT UP!
gee people these days lol |
Paul Smith
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 | 02:42 PM
There is a very important reason the "Paul Is Dead" Phenomenon exists. All is revealed at: http://atruthdiscovered.blogspot.com |
papadave
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 | 08:36 PM
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha |
dan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 | 08:01 PM
http://www.paulreallyisdead.com/home.html
George's Last Testament
Here's the real story. |
dan
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 | 08:03 PM
http://www.paulreallyisdead.com/home.html
As told by George Harrison himself.
BTW: I hear Ringo also has a last testament revealing the truth also. Hafta wait for that one. |
Esme
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 | 03:35 PM
Please spend more money on that trash. |
1245
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 | 08:59 AM
he his alive |
the BEBEBEATLES
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 | 07:54 PM
GUYS U R IDIOTS HOW IS PAUL DEAD. HE PERFORMED ON SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE THE OTHER NIGHT. AND +(plus)
IF HE GOT INTO A CAR CRASH ANYONE CAN SURVIVE IT!!!
LIKE!!! THINK A LITTLE PEOPLE!!! |
the BEBEBEATLES
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 | 07:59 PM
YOU PEOPLE ARE IDIOTS HE IS NOT DEAD! HE PERFORMED ON SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE THE OTHER NIGHT AND RUST ME IT WAS NOT A LOOK-A-LIKE1! AND + (plus) IF HE GOT INTO A CAR CRASH WHO SAYS YOU CAN'T SURVIVE ONE!!! AND THAT'S A GOOD IDEA TO MAKE CLUES LIKE THAT BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BUY THE ALBUM TO SEE IF ANYTHING LIKE THAT IS IN IT.
P.S.
he is NOT DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
JPMisALIVE
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 | 11:04 PM
As seen in the most legit argument called "Paul McCartney is really dead." (a documentary showing "clues" on albums covers etc) it says that George Harrison left a recording on a mini audio cassette player while on his death bed explaining the supposed accident and how they hid it along with those "clues". It also says that the government agreed to the transformation of a stranger to replace Paul to "avoid hysteria". If one of the four men were to reveal the secret, all of them were to be assassinated. But.. Oh, look. We are still blessed to have PAUL MCCARTNEY and Ringo Starr. An obvious fraud, proven by a contradiction. |
|
Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First < 2 3 4 |
