|
Page 1 of 4 pages 1 2 3 > Last › |
RED MAN
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2004 | 11:07 PM
Duh he is dead |
A dude
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 | 10:18 AM
he has to be dead. the new one is taller!!! 😉
|
Paul is dead
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2004 | 06:53 PM
Please if you are looking at this reply with any clues you may know. For example, Paul has his shoes of in several pictures. Please send pictures if you have any also. |
Jacob
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 | 02:22 PM
http://www.angelfire.com/ct/scrmgdasys/
There are lots of sites about it. just google it. |
Paul is dead
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2004 | 09:09 PM
Thanks for the site jacob. |
macie
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 | 03:14 PM
OMG!!!whoever thinks he's dead must be living in the past!He just played at the superbowl during halftime!DUHH!!!jeeze ya'll are a bunch of numbskulls.but still it's pretty funny to me ya'll think he's dead.besides his son jesse would have said sumthin about that! |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:10 PM
WARNING! WHAT FOLLOWS IS MEANT TO BE HUMOR
That wasn't him at the superbowl. That was the double that replaced him when he died. Duh.
NOW ENDING HUMOROUS COMMENT. PLEASE RETURN TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED STATE OF BLISSFUL MISCOMPREHENSION |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:49 PM
Paul isn't dead, he's in my trunk.....You seen the half time show, do you blam me..Bring back nipples!!!!! |
macie
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 | 04:05 PM
Paul McCartney is dead my ass.when someone gives me proof that he's dead i'll be the queen of england!Gah who the hell made up this stupid bullshit?! |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 | 06:25 PM
Ya know, some people just don't get it.
You do realize that this makes Ringo the last Beatle alive. Just the man to carry on the legacy. |
blahblah
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 02:34 PM
Dude, he's not freaking dead nobody can sing like he can. Just because he had his shoes off doesnt mean he's dead. |
Tessa
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 03:48 PM
Paul is CLEARLY dead. Just listen to Revolution #9 backwards.
On a related note, the Beatles were quite definitely communicating with Charles Manson through the White Album. |
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 05:05 PM
Paul is alive and living in the Netherlands.
I thought we established that a few days ago, people.
:roll: |
blahblah
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 05:06 PM
I still dont think he's dead. I'm not sure the other beatles would accept some look-alike in their group, and there are different versions of how he crashed. Sounds like a hoax to me. |
blahblah
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 05:11 PM
so people are saying, if I took a picture of myself without shoes that means Im dead? wow. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 06:38 PM
Please, they killed the first guy to make room for Ringo. Why wouldn't they replace Paul with a double when he died? They were the AntiChrists for pete's sake. They were EVIL. The morality of their actions never even came up.
blahblah, you're making it too easy, man. |
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 07:23 PM
Hey blahblah, I've got something for you...
Right <a href="http://www.villagephotos.com/image.asp?id_=12100466">HERE</a>. |
blahblah
|
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 | 11:45 PM
sorry if I upset you but I can believe what I want. I'm not so sure they were antichrists and they kicked pete best out because his drumming wasnt good enough for the record company then invited ringo. They didn't KILL him. I've read all about this thing. Rumors have been spreading like a wildfire over the years. |
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 12:11 AM
Hell's teeth and pogo sticks! (Thanks, Christopher), get a clue!
The clue you should be getting by now, as people have all but bludgeoned you with it, is that THEY ARE JOKING. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 06:31 AM
3 cheers for Rod! |
Chicken
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 12:24 PM
I'm pretty sure mcartney is alive, but I find all the clues kinda creepy. Maybe they did it as a hoax? Maybe it's all a joke. Maybe paul really did die. I dunno. |
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 | 10:39 PM
Hip hip, Hooray! x3 😊 |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 07:35 AM
Damn Rod, that's one of my favorite songs. Kinda sad, really. |
Katherine
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 07:41 AM
You know what the Beatles themselves said: "Well, here's another clue for you all: the walrus was Paul!" It's all getting clearer now: obviously Paul was replaced sometime in the late sixties with a disturbingly humanoid-looking walrus... |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 | 08:22 AM
First thing first. If Paull was dead, trust me, "THEY" would let us know. It would be tooo profitable to cover up. |
LUKEY70
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 | 08:56 PM
paul is not dead!!! what the heck kinda frickin idiot told you that!!!!!!! |
LUKEY70
|
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 | 08:59 PM
why would paul mcartney be dead? if he died in a car accident dont u think the everyone woul have heard about it the next day?any way he isnt the best beatle so it dosent matter if hes dead. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 | 09:48 AM
It's a secret. Duh. |
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
|
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 | 12:00 PM
"he isnt the best beatle"
Well seeing as how the Beatles do not currently exist, how can any of them be the best Beatle?
An how does not being the best make it not matter if you're dead? You're quite obviously NOT the best wrangler of the English language, so, following your reasoning.... |
James
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 | 04:07 PM
Paul McCartney isn't dead yet. That's just a fabrication based on the cover of the Abbey Road album. He wears no shoes. Isn't it Italians who bury their dead barefoot? |
Mark-N-Isa
in Midwest USA
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2005 | 05:56 PM
Or better yet...
WHO REALLY CARES? |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 | 08:29 AM
The surviving Beatles had a funerial ceremony in 1967 where they drank red wine and ate bread made from the ashes of Paul. That way, no matter what happened they would all be together. Ringo and George repeated this ceremony in 1982 to honor John. Ringo just last year honored George this way. When Ringo dies his ashes will be baked into bread and distibuted amoung friends and family to insure that the Beatles will live on forever amoung those they left behind.
😉 |
Marli
in a constant meditative trance
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 | 01:09 PM
Wait... Wouldn't the Beatles just 'go through' and end up in a sewage dumb somewhere if that were true? |
Marli
in a constant meditative trance
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 | 01:32 PM
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/3674/pid.html">The simplest 'Paul is Dead' clues site I've come upon.</a>
Edited by Charybdis to fix link |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 13, 2005 | 02:34 PM
The Beatles were true believers in the "You Are What You Eat" mantra they learned from their time spent in Tibet. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 | 09:49 AM
People in Tibet just say that b/c their food is gross...ya gotta make up SOMETHING to get yourself to eat it. |
Neil
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 | 06:14 AM
This whole thing sounds terribly believable, BUT...
If Paul was dead, wouldn't they just hide him away after the demise of the Beatles?
I mean, why risk exposing this further by having him continue his musical career? |
Colleen Smith
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 | 10:14 AM
i'm only 17 years old but i love the beatles they are the greatest band that i had ever heard. other bands didn't make me sing. when i heard about the paul is dead hoax i knew it was a hoax. if you think that this story was real you must not be a true beatles fan. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 | 10:20 AM
Money people! Paul was replaced by second rate guitarist Cecil Abernathy who underwent plastic surgery to put the final finishes on a natural resemblance to Paul. His inability to keep up the level of talent that the real Paul possessed helped lead to the breakup. |
Chuck
in Rhode Island
Member
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 | 05:54 AM
fairly interesting <a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colID=13&articleID=000EB977-12BE-1264-8F9683414B7FFE9F">article</a> the Skeptics column in Scientific American. starts with paul is dead then gets into the virgin mary grilled cheese and ends up with the human brain and pattern recognition...pretty dry stuff actually..whaddya expect from Scientific American...but an interesting read |
flim
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 | 06:08 PM
Of course he's dead. The soul of anyone who could write "Mull of Kintyre" must be dead... |
Paul is ALIVE!
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 | 07:12 AM
Ok, i have heaps proving paul is alive, if u want to know just ask on this forum, and there all very true and convinsing, so if u think he's dead, but doesn't want to believe it, i ave the truth that in fact he is alive. |
Paul is alive
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 | 07:16 AM
its paul is ALIVE! again click on my name, there are some things there. I have plenty more though. |
Duh he's alive
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 | 05:56 PM
duh he's alive. I know exactly how to prove every stupid little "clue" wrong, but that would take too long to type. For instance, when you hear "I buried Paul" at the end of Strawberry Feilds he is actually saying "Cranberry sauce." They electronically manipulated it so they could sell more records. the Beatles had no say in this, however. In Glass Onion Lennon said "Here's another clue for you all, the walrus was paul" he was actually making fun of the idiots that believe in this "paul is dead" crap. But of course, there are those poor souls that are waaay too deep in the matter and I'm afraid they have gone insane over this long enough that NOBODY can convince them. |
Kenneth
|
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 | 01:12 PM
ok first of all im young but i beleive the beatles are the best band of all time. and i think that anyone who believes that mccartney is dead is an idiot.
first of all. if he was the remaining beatles would've told us. they wouldnt have kept it a secret
second of all. nobody can immitate pauls voice
third of all. just bc there are clues of the album doesnt corfirm the question, it coulve just been a joke. theres no REAL proof.
and thats all i have to say |
carlos gonzalez
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 | 11:32 AM
HELOW TO EVERYBADY, I JUST WANNNA TELL YOU THAT IF PAUL WOULD BE DEAD, I COUDL NOT BE HIDDEN FOR ALL THIS TIME. PAUL SAID IN AN INTERWIE THAT HE DECIDED TO SEPARATE FROM BEATLES AND TO BE ALONE (SINGER) BECAUSE OF THE JOHN LENNON BEHAVIOR WHILE THEY LIVED TOGETHER AT PAUL |
DFStuckey
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 | 03:40 AM
Thank you Carlos for that opinion. It was certainly from you.
In any event, realising that Paul is a vegan, could it be that he isn't dead, but just smells that way? |
carlos gonzalez
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 | 04:07 PM
paul, is a poet, as the beatles were; they played, making some song of real life. in a son "i don`t believe" of jonh lennon, after go separeted from beathes he said that he changed all consept of living, and invited us to join him. is an adviced to try to get better, they people`s thinking, to do not believe blimdy every things we see, ear,. be more concience, in our life. |
meep
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 | 05:16 AM
its hilarious the whole conspiracy theory. Wanna hear my theory, (ur gonna anyway) the beatles heard about the conspiracy theories and where like lets have a bit of fun with this, entertainers need to be entertained too, so where like lets chuck in some "clues" for the hell of it, hell i would if i was in the same position
anyway his dad got up and testified in court that "this is my son"
the beatles lost paul and instantly found somone who looked exactly the same with the same singing and song writing caperbilities? i think not |
DFStuckey
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 | 05:30 AM
Whoever he is, he has a new album coming out soon.
Besides which, did anyone here ever believe that the Rolling Stones would still be touring by the time half the Beatles actually were dead? |
Kyte
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 | 12:12 AM
Wouldn't the most obvious thing to do, what with today's technology, would be to just take a DNA test? I mean come on, that simple. |
meep
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 | 01:35 AM
cos ppl like believeing what they want, if you did a blood teast ppl would still come up with concpiracy theoris on how the DNA test was rigged etc
ppl love conspiracies |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 | 04:16 PM
Why should he do a DNA test? The rumour is hardly damaging any record sales. And, even if they were, he's pretty much rich enough already.
I don't think he cares that a tiny minority of people think he might be a lookalike. |
katie
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 | 07:33 PM
I Don't Believe hes dead but its kinda fun to look into it !
: Has anyone ever heard the rumur that john was the only bandmember beside "William Cambell" the "replacement" who knew paul died and he was killed because of this , John Lennon was the greatest man who ever lived and every time i hear beutiful boy i cry !
: Does anyone else get freaked out by revoloution 9 ! |
DFStuckey
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 | 09:39 PM
katie, any music that Yoko Ono is involved with freaks me out in a totally wrong way:)
But seriously, John certainly could write music alone or with Paul and his loss was the biggest blow to popular music for that decade. As to theories about his death, well, Sean alwyas claimed that the US department of State feared his influence on young people, going so far as to say "They knew that if he (John) told kids to blow up the Capitol building, they would do it."
This theory jars with a recent release of a risk assessment about Lennon at the Democratic congress that had the FBI conclude that while John had radical ideas and was a natural focus, he "Spends much of his time under the influence of narcotic substances." and was a limited threat. |
Kyte
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 | 02:19 PM
There has been made a documentary on the subject.
It's called: who buried Paul mcCartney? by Wouter van Opdorp
http://www.cinema.nl/cinema/videofragments/index.jsp?videofragments=24021121
http://www.whoburiedpaulmccartney.com |
Karin
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 | 02:01 AM
HI!
I don't believe Paul is dead. My theory is, that Paul had an accedent in 1966, but didn't die. He broke his tooth, you can see it on the Anthology-viedeo for "Rain". Well, somebody heard of it and tells everyone that Paul had an accident and died and now the Beatles put little clues in their songs and sleeves etc.
Now, the beatles (with Paul) heard of it and thought: "Well, that's funny." and put little clues in their songs etc. to fool the people! Now who believes Paul is dead,may believe it, who doesn't believe Paul is dead, than it may be so!
Understand me?
😉
That is what I think!
And I don't think that one man (William Campbell) can play the rest of his life anyone else! No one would make it! |
conichiwa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 | 02:47 PM
i like hilary duff. and pickles. the beatles are ALL DEAD |
DFStuckey
|
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 | 03:05 PM
Konichiwa, conichiwa. Even if Paul is dead, that still leaves one Beatle around.
Mind you, your opinion leaves much to disrecommend it if you like Hilary Duff. As to pickles, that is a poser . . . Though Hilary posing with a pickle raises intriguing possibilities. 😊
Yes, I am the eggman. Sue me. 😊 |
jordan
|
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2005 | 06:10 PM
paul is not dead, any one who belives that bull shit is stupid besides since he was the best beatle they would of fell apart without paul and sounded like crap. |
|
Page 1 of 4 pages 1 2 3 > Last › |
