Newspapers are reporting the
story of Charlie, a parrot that is 104 years old, once belonged to Winston Churchill, and still swears at the Nazis. When I read about Charlie, I figured it couldn't be true. First of all, could a parrot really live that long? Well, apparently in rare cases they can. So that part of the story might be true. But there is a lot of doubt about whether Charlie ever belonged to Churchill.
Churchill's family is denying that Winston ever owned a parrot. Charlie might simply be a parrot that somebody once taught to swear at the Nazis. Oh, and Charlie is a girl.
Comments
Chill out. I was trying not to encourage the exploitative exotic bird pet trade (without unnecessarily writing an essay about it). Yeah, they can make good pets for somebody who has the experience, understands what they're getting themselves into, and can provide for a bird for the 80+ years of its life but the vast majority of people can't. People SHOULD take the first comment seriously, because getting any type of pet is a life-long commitment. And anybody who takes the posting about the Norwegian Blue seriously (as if it would mean anything to someone who does) is a moron.
Macaws are not an impulse buy!? How do you explain the hundreds of macaws abandoned every year? What about the 30 psittacines I've cared for over the past few years that were discarded by their owners after they became too loud, too posessive, too destructive, etc.? The high price of these birds has nothing to do with it. There are clearly plenty of people who can afford to pay this price, which is how such a such a large number of exotic animals are bought as pets each year. Go visit an exotic cat sanctuary sometime and ask those running the sanctuary about the problem. People buy tigers for pets every day (for about $300 at the cheapest).
You think I'm lying because I don't like animals in captivity? I am unquestionably an anti-animal rights activist. I have a job working with captive, trained macaws among other animals so quit making assumptions.
Then you go straight into lying about caring for 30 parrots! Give me a break! You don't know anything about them, much less have the ability to properly care for one, much less 30 of them. The fact is, you know nothing about these birds, or any bird for that matter. Unlike you, I base my conclusions on facts, such as your lack of basic knowledge regarding any parrot, and you even signed in under a different user name to make it sound like you did. That is really pathetic, katie.
As far as my knowledge goes, macaws are most certainly an impulse buy in many cases. These enchanting parrots will entertain you with their talkative personalities, comical antics, and colorful plumage. Countless people are captivated by such a marvelous animal and feel they must own it without realizing the realities of caring for the bird.
"While there are birds that for one reason or another displaced, it is more likely due to owners that die and do not provide for their bird's care, as well as those that must give up their birds for personal reasons." *sigh* Go to any reputable exotic bird organization and I can guarantee most of the birds there are result of an unprepared/unaccomidating owner.
"I base my conclusions on facts, such as your lack of basic knowledge regarding any parrot" That, sir, is an assumption. Far from an actual fact. Indeed, the only facts you've posted on this topic were "there is no such thing as a 'Norwegian Blue' parrot" and "Macaws cost between $600 to more than $8000" Which, in truth, the Hyacinths can get up to $15000(depending on your area).
I'm not trying to begin a "bash fest", but as a once unbiased reader, this is what I see. Not that anyone asked, but I commented anyway.
Anyone that knows the least amount about macaws, or any high dollar bird, would know that they are not impulse buys. In fact, the reality is just the opposite. Most people take weeks to make these purchases and even longer if they are working through a breeder. Few breeders would ever consider selling a bird to a person not completely aware of what they are getting into.
As the captivating nature of the bird. I have yet to see a single breeder or pet store that can mask over the screams, or the love for wood chewing these birds enjoy, so if you call the captivating, I bet you have some interesting choices in your life. This last post, most likely another Katie knock-off, shows the same lack of knowledge.
Here's the real facts. I know and work with numerous parrot rescues across the country, and even a couple in the UK. The primary reason for parrots that come to them are, birds that are re-homed due to a change in the owner's living situation, i.e., death, divorce, or addition of a child to the family. There are also those that were abused, usually due to a person receiving a bird from the first reason. They rarely, if ever, recieve birds due to the circumstances described by the katie chorus line. The reason is simple. If you buy a bird, and the bird doesn't work out. You take the bird back to the store.
So, Katie, and all your little aliases, the facts outweigh all that you claim. Simply reposting the same defeated story under another name doesn't make you look right, it makes you look pathetic. Grow up, get a life, and if you are going to make a statement, get your facts straight, not propaganda that you want to believe, get real facts. Lastly, when you are trying to pretend you are someone agreeing with yourself, try not to use the same speech patterns and spelling errors. That just makes it that much easier to see through your little scam. At least give me a challenge! C'mon! ROFLMAOAY!
L.T.
Ed
I have nothing against you; I'm not quite sure why you're so defensive on the matter. It's a lighthearted debate, no worries.
The facts are against you, and it is simple to see that by simply getting information from a source other than PETA. I don't view the lives of these creatures as something fit for a "light-hearted debate", but it isn't surprising you would put such low regard on the discussion. I think you position is better described as weak-minded over light-hearted any day. Try finding some actual facts to support your case next time, if you can.
I have a friend that operates a bird only pet shop, and they have on hand a number of Macaws, from mini macaws to Scarlet Macaws. They do NOT allow customers to make an uninformed, impulse buy when it comes to any bird. This is the way the majority of pet shops are run now. Even large chain stores educate before the sale, so you primary point is out the window there. You have no statistics to back up your points, and I can point to a number of studies that support mine. So stop your whining, which is all you people know how to do, and get a life. Just because you are too poor to own your own macaw, doesn't mean the rest of us have to not enjoy our life just because you can't. BTW, in the time this topic has gone on, we start breeding blue & golds, like our friend in this topic, and have sold 64 so far to very homes for $1500 a piece. We have also added 15 more birds to our flock, all in your honor.
Cheers!
"My friend Bob likes peanut butter and jelly, thus it is better."
"Well I have been eating Mac and Cheese for 10 years and it's always worked for me."
I don't mean to offend anyone, but you are both taking things to personal.
In the long run, what are you guys going to get out of this? Does it matter if Katie is right that most macaws are impulse buys or that Ed is right that people are educated?
Either way, many parrots are left with out a home. I think you both agree on that note. Agree on the bigger picture, and stop arguing. The world needs more people that love birds enough to argue about it,as well as more people that are mature enough to walk away from a pointless debate.
Now I'm sure you both have at least one companion parrot that would be very happy to have your attention, instead of you wasting said attention on a debate that neither of you are going to "win".
Take care,
Kia
"Facts and statistics are lovely things, the best thing about them... is that you can make them say anything you want."
The fact here is, I own and have worked with large birds, including macaws, for many years. I know the market, both breeder and pet stores, and while there are problems, the majority of the market is better now than it was twenty years ago. It is rare for someone to buy a large bird these days without them doing some research to learn about the birds. In my experience I have seen no one buy a macaw and regret the purchase. They are wonderful birds and are great companions to those of us who care for them. That is the fact and the only truth on this thread. Lastly, it DOES matter. If we stand aside and let PETA form the public opinion, it is a matter of time before our rights will be a thing of the past. I for one have no intent of standing aside for that.
I also agree with you that PETA is crazy a small group of crazy wackos and not a good resource at all, and that any companion bird can make an amazing pet for the right person. However, I've run into lots of sanctuaries (noted that this is a biased source) that back up the claim that the larger parrots (cockatoos and macaws mostly) are purchaced with little knowledge of the amount of care they take, not on impluse per se, but just without realizing what it means to own a large bird.
I'm all for having a companion bird, especially once you've done your homework and buy from a reputable breeder or shop. I've seen more birds that are happy and healthy as a companion parrot than I have seen obviously poorly cared for birds. The information about parrots is very impressive and the hightened awarness of proper parrot care has reduced the number of rescue and abandoned birds. (Indirect quote from "freeparrots.org" pole "Are parrots good pets and from )
I will admit that I don't own a parrot myself. A friend of mine asked me to look at this from a debate stand point.
And I might note that in a formal debate, nobody here has provided a good argument yet. It takes solid statistics not personal experiences to sway people. And it seems to me that you are going off of personal experience more then anything else. All the statistics I came up with are old and out of date and/or unreliable. *shrugs* makes for a tough debate.
So in the light of my desire to make this a real debate Katie go to avianwelfare.org get some real facts and stats and "expert opinions".
Ed go to animalworld.com or any of thousands of websites that talk about macaw compatibility, check out some sanctuary websites.
Unfortunatly Ed, you have a tougher battle because the people that are against parrots as pets yell the loudest (probably due to their lack of real knowledge, ("those that don't know what they are talking about yell")). Best of luck.
You are the first to post something to look into, and I will and respond soon. As for Winston's parrot, the family claims he didn't have one, and then some account say he did, but it was an African Grey. I think the fact is we may never really know for certain, since most of the people that might remember are very old or dead now. So the information is mostly second hand, but there are no written accounts, to my knowledge, that he ever had a parrot at all. From what I have read, he sounds more like a dog man, but who knows?
😊
Kia
The history channel.com has a write up that historians have dismissed the claim,
"Judith Seaward, marketing manager at Chartwell, said: "We really looked and looked and know he had a budgerigar and all sorts of other animals.
"He loved animals, he had dogs, cats, pigs - but there's no record of a parrot. "
That's what I got.
<news.bbc.co.uk>
<NPR.org>
Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Cheers,
Charlie
How ever most Macaws also don't live to be 80+ years old unlike what Katie said. That would be very rare.
I also am a board member to a local 501c3 non-profit parrot rescue and I can attest to the fact that yes "most" birds are given up do to family circumstances but a fair amount are also given up because people have no idea what they are doing and bought the bird because it was pretty.
Also very few stores offer a return policy for more then a few days and the policy is usually in reference to a bird health warranty. I know of no stores that if you buy a baby macaw and down the road when it grows up and develops unwanted behaviors, will they take it back and give you a refund.
Hey Ed, what rescues do you work with? Since you are checking Katie's I would be happy to check yours. You are welcome to check mine. http://www.pamperedparrots.org the group I work with.
Ed claims
"In my experience I have seen no one buy a macaw and regret the purchase." Does this mean that he doesn't check up on the welfare of his birds? Because he claims to selling dozens of birds and I am inclined to think that over all the years he is claiming to be a breeder that at least one person would be having buyers remorse.
Not only that but did anyone catch that first he claims his "friend" owns the store then he states "our store?"
He also claims that large chain stores make sure that people research befor they buy. Not so my friend. I can personally attest to and proabbly prove if I need to that I know for a FACT that our local Petsmart sold an Umbrella cockatoo before it was even finished being weaned. The bird was 2 before the owners got him weaned beacause they have no idea what the heck they were doing.
In Ed's defence I think Katie is wrong that macaws make bad pets. Macaws make wonderful companions when you take the time to learn about them. I think it is a HUGE diservice to the bird when you buy for the wrong reasons. I too tell people the good the bad and the ugly. And I do understand that this would ruffle some feathers with Macaw owners. I LOVE my birds and I tell people that but I also say that you have to really know what you are doing or else the bird will be at the top of the pecking order instead of you.
On your rescue's site, they state that more than 400 birds have been placed into homes. Obviously, they would do more work to insure these birds are properly placed, so this confirms what I have been saying all along. There is no epidemic of birds without homes. These birds might go into the rescue, but they are being cared for and then placed in loving homes. Thank you for making my point, even though you tried to discredit it. The site you listed proves I am right. Thanks for posting it.
Why don't you mind your own business. You know nothing about parrots or this discussion, and have the nerve to post ANYTHING, that is just amazing to me. I for one am glad that Ed stood up and fought these loser peta supporters. They will say or do anything, including kill the animals they claim to want to "protect" and they know nothing about these beautiful creatures. What Ed said is 100% true, and anyone with half a brain would see that. I admire him for having the courage to take a stand and never back down.