Status: Real
This series of images of two pit bulls attacking a bull are a couple of months old (though they're new to me). They recall those images of a
mule attacking a mountain lion. Despite looking rather surreal (especially that one of the dog suspended in air above the bull), not to mention bizarre (what were the dogs thinking?), they are real. This scene occurred in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, outside of New Orleans, when the two pit bulls, crazed with hunger, decided that a bull would make a great dinner. They were wrong. A reporter for the
Sunday Telegraph witnessed the scene:
Like a wrestling tag team, the bitch and the dog attacked with awesome ferocity, leaping at the bull's head and latching on to its muzzle. The stricken bull repeatedly shook the dogs off, flinging them up to 15 feet in the air. But they took turns to keep up the attack, exhausting the bull which was by now smeared with blood. Even after the bull trampled the bitch, leaving it dazed, the dog stepped up its attack... It was too dangerous for an unarmed witness to intervene but The Sunday Telegraph flagged down a National Guard truck. Seeing what was happening, a soldier shot the bitch in the head. The dog paused before resuming the attack. It took two bullets to stop it dead.
Comments
Cue the "pitty" defenders...
Er... yes.
It is the correct word to describe such creatures.
Whom are you concerned will take offence, people or the dog? :D
GO BULL GO!
As you said, though, we are dependant on the reporter's description of what happened, and we all know just how accurate and knowledgable news reports can be.
k about....
I find it rediculous that anyone can justify killing hungry animals for hunting simply because they are a specific breed.
If those had been labadors, would shooting them have still been okay? I seriously doubt it. Labs would have garnered sympathy, while the fact that these are two pit bulls just feeds more fuel to the breed specific legislation movement.
Fritz made some good points. Maybe they should outlaw stupid humans and then we wouldn't have so many aggressve dogs.
1) no fear of humans
2) don't behave like wild animals
3) don't behave like domesticated animals
4) have the potential to completely fuck the local balance of wildlife
5) have the potential to wreak havoc on human activities (such as attacking domestic animals like the bull depicted)
6) in the case of these dogs, bred for fighting
A pack of feral dogs needs to be dealt with very aggressively. Next time you have six slavering animals attacking your pet cat, the last thing on your mind is letting nature take its course.
As a whole, Pit Bulls are very kind and docile. The American Kennel Club recommends the American Pit Bull Terrier as a pet for families with children. If you look at the statistics on the Temperment Testing Society website, you will see that Pit Bulls have one of the highest passing rates of any breed. The majority of times that there is a report on a "pit bull" attack the dog(s) involved is not even a Pit Bull. If you do see a picture of the dog involved, most times, it is a mongrel of some sort or a dog of another aggressive breed such as Mastiffs, Akitas, German Shepards, or even Chows. Below are recent articles about attacks of dogs of various other breeds:
http://www.workingpitbull.com/fatalbook.htm
Get informed before you go running around "half-cocked" spreading misinformation.
Pitublls are not humane agressive can be animal agressive if trained to be. Pitbulls love anyone and anything as long as their taken care of. My dogs have to sleep under the blanket take showers with me go to the store etc. Society needs to be educated on this special breed of dog their actually a four legged humane if you know about the breed and own ot.
Dear Katie in Philly ...
Humans would NOT behave this way ... we are gatherers ... stupid dummy head!
(sorry, i had to kick it down a notch so you could understand ... given your mentality level and all ... )
pst; the correct spelling is; probably ...
Second, for those of you defending pit bulls. I agree with you (you can see that in my previous response, however I want to issue a word of caution. Typing curse words, insults, and otherwise demeaning people who are afraid of specific breeds of dogs does nothing but ENFORCE the hate and fear that these people have. They may be wrong, but when you defend pit bulls with one breath and curse someone out with the next, you are just proving their point. If you want to be taken seriously, speak with respect and intelligence, please.
Third, Gwen from Chesapeake, VA: First off, see above statement. Second off, you showed your own ignorance in saying that humans are "gatherers" and not "hunters." The proper term is "hunter/gatherer" and they go TOGETHER. Humans have eaten meat sense the beginning of time. We are not herbivores or carnivores. We are omnivores. This means we need BOTH meat (or a meat-like substitute) and vegetation to survive.
First of all, this incident happened after the devasation of Katrina. Pretty much the city of New Orleans was a collapsed society. Domesticated animals ran wild through out and around the city. As you see in the picture, the bull is also wild with the dogs. The wolf comment is moronic. Any wolf, coyote, cogar, ect.. would of been shot doing the same act. If not for the destruction of property, the saftey of humans. That is why they shot the feral beasts (feral mean once domesticated then becoming wild as stated before). Wolves taking down a deer in the wild is nature. Pitbulls acting wild taking down a bull near humans causes fear. Humans act on fear and take down the threat. What gives you the right to judge the actions of the people involved in the first place? Witnessing the photos from a safe place such as your mother's basement after the fact gives you no persective of the incident. Remember, Katrina devestated a whole coast line. Human lives is the number one concern during this situation, not the dogs. The comparing humans to these dogs in the same circumstance is also idiotic. Starving, we will kill lower beast but never with this much violence. Some people will even find alternatives. Hence, why we are omnivores. What a fool to think that the photogapher was standing witnessing the event with out a escape route. The dogs were too focused on the kill to engage the photographer and at a great distance at that.
Please use statics and not your heart. I know not all pitbulls are violent, but I would never own one. "Studies indicate that pit bull-type dogs were involved in approximately a third of human DBRF (i.e., dog bite related fatalities) reported during the 12-year period from 1981 through1992, and Rottweilers were responsible for about half of human DBRF reported during the 4 years from 1993 through 1996....[T]he data indicate that Rottweilers and pit bull-type dogs accounted for 67% of human DBRF in the United States between 1997 and 1998. It is extremely unlikely that they accounted for anywhere near 60% of dogs in the United States during that same period and, thus, there appears to be a breed-specific problem with fatalities." With information like this, it is no wonder why the outcome came as it did. Next time you encounter an incident like this, please feel free to open a can of Alpo and call the cute little puppies over.
Point 1. Originally the bulldogs were bred exactly for this purpose. They were called butcher's dogs then. What the dogs are attempting to do is to get a nose hold on the bull which would hold the bull still long enough for the butcher to cut his throat.
Point 2. All dogs are biters unless they are dominated by their owners or caretakers. If they are allowed to dominate their owners they will wind up biting somebody.
Point 3. Bulldogs have earned a reputation as biters because of their irresponsible owners. The type of person it takes to put to lovable pets into a ring or pit to fight to the death is not likely the kind of person who will properly care for or even care to understand why a dog could become dangerous even to their owners. They would see aggressive behavior as a plus.
Point 4. Humanizing animals leads to all kinds of problems in our social environment where animals are included as part of our households. Please watch Ceasar Milan on the National Geographic channel or read one of his books, the latest being 'Be the Pack Leader'
Point 5. There have been many cases of dogs being shot in the head and not only surviving but continuing their excited behavior. Similar to the seritonin effect on the human brain, dogs experience a chemical event which limits the pain sensors when they are this excited.
Yes this looks very bad to the socialite's very civilized eye. However, in the animal world, this is normal and natural The bull or bovine is a natural prey for canine and feline animals. These may be domesticated animals, but they are animals and easily revert back to the wild given circumstances like the disaster of hurricane Katrina. It would have been extremely dangerous for any human to try to intervene in this situation, but after the animals were separated the dogs could have been brought back under human control quite easily. Ceasar calls this heightened state of excitement in dogs a red zone. Its very difficult to bring dogs back into a controllable condition until they are separated from whatever has brought them to this state. It was entirely unnecessary to kill them though.
My dad used this kind of dogs to do exactly what these dogs are doing to chase down and capture wild cattle in Oklahoma 40 years ago when I was a kid.
As for the APBT haters out here, I disrespectfully have to disagree with your opinions. As a long time voluenteer at countless humane societies, rescues, and zoos; not to mention my years of working in my Vet's office, I have never once been bitten by an American Pit Bull Terrier. OTOH, I have been bit over 30 times, by various breeds, including chihuahuas, poms, poodles, schnauzers, border collies, labs, goldens, boxers, cocker spaniels, one GSD, and one unfortunate bite from my breed of choice, a Doberman.
I currently am owned by 1 cat and 3 canines, including a mini schnauzer, a beagle, and a pit bull mix. Out of all of them, my pit mix is by far the most docile, gentle and social. I fostered him and 3 other litter mates, and found them great homes. He has been extensively socialized since a young age, and now at the ripe age of 9yrs old, he has NO bite record at all. He is an avid agility dog, as well as has his CGC, and we work with our local school district to show children the proper way to interact with animals.
Please also remember there is a distinct difference between animal agression and human agression.
Lastly, there were COUNTLESS bites and issues with the various collies on the set of Lassie, but never once any problems with the APBT named Petey from The Little Rascal's.
Sgt Stubby was also the United States first decorated war dog, and he was an APBT.
Please refer to Diane Jessup's site, for more info, on pit bulls and their working applications in today's society.
You my "friend" are an idiot! APBT's have NO such thing as "lock jaw". IT'S A MYTH, a HOAX and retarded at best. Also, if you know ANYTHING about the history of APBT, you would know your statement about cropped/docked animals is false as well. If you look at pictures of pit fighting APBT's, you will see they for the most part ALL were natural. The ears are left intact to give the other dog a non lethal target, and the tail of an APBT is NEVER docked unless injury dictates it.
You would be wise to retract that statement and never remember the phrase "lock jaw" in conjunction with pit bulls again.
To Gwen in Chesapeake....
Since when do T-bone steaks come ready to pick off a tree? It's funny that you call Katie a stupid dummy head, when what she said is not as ignorant as your statement that humans are gatherers. We are DUAL, meaning HUNTERS and GATHERERS! If you choose to berate someone for something to disagree with, make sure you back it up with fact, not nonsensical ramblings in order to make yourself seem smarter.
To George in the USA...
I have to yet again disagree. The national database for dog bite stats is as best flawed. You can not expect the average citizen of the US to be able to distinguish between breeds of dogs. Hell, most liscensed Animal Control officers and Vets can't even do it, and their jobs are animals! A dog bite happens and if you see a stocky headed med build dog of any color, the first thing people think of is pit bull! There are OVER 25 purebred dog breeds (not to mention COUNTLESS) mixed breeds that routinely get mistaken for a APBT. Some of those are rare, but most are fairly common in the USA.
Do me a favor and see what you come up with!
http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html
http://members.aol.com/radogz/find.html
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthebull/findpitbull_v3.html
My cousin in England, is middle-aged, mild in manner, 5-ft 7-in and weighs 160-lb.
He was taking his small West Highland Terrier for a walk when he was approached by a
very large biker with extensive tattoos and wearing in leathers, wrap-around sunglasses
and a bandana headscarf. In addition, the man was accompanied by a large slavering pit-bull terrier with a spiked collar pulling strongly on a heavy leash. Adding to this the biker obviously had something to say to my cousin. A nightmare opened up.
"'ere," said the biker, "your dog could kill my dog"
Flustered and amazed at the statement my cousin stuttered a non-committal reply
"I don't think he would"
"Yes, 'e could" came the reply "'e could get caught in my dog's throat!"
So now you know how dangerous small dogs can be. Perhaps they should be banned.
Tim Moore
Whether a Bull, Horse or even a Lion would find this attack a tough fight especially if the pitbulls are defending their territory or fighting to eat.
http://www.obediencetrainingfordogsblog.com/most-dangerous-dogs/list-of-the-top-10-most-dangerous-dogs
The ATTS is a test designed to identify suitable dog candidates for bite work training. The test is designed to find dog candidates that are both bold and able to maintain focus in strange situations.
It was never designed to screen for suitability for companion animals. It significantly does not test for reactivity to dogs and other animals which is why pit avocates like it, why the dogs do well, and why it is meaningless.
I have personally built a catapult to mimic the above picture second to the left. It is very hard to design such a catapult and have many months invested. However, the results have been spectacular. I will try to post pictures of the many test launches I have. I have been able to recently launch a pit bull a good 125 yards. Do not fret, I too place .45 caliber rounds into each pit's head at 850 feet per second after each launch. I have become very efficient in controlling this breed's population. The pups are the most aerodynamic and you should see them fly. Sometimes it is very hard to find some of the test subjects after launch. So if you see a little pit bull pup worming around on four broken legs, then stop by and say hi.
How come so many people are so ready to put their own children at stake in defence of these animals? And don