Scientific American reports that a nonsense word from
The Simpsons has made its way into a scientific paper. Stanford University physicist Shamit Kachru managed to slip the word "embiggen" into a journal article titled "Gauge/gravity duality and meta-stable dynamical supersymmetry breaking."
The word embiggen first appeared in a 1996 episode of
The Simpsons. It was used by Jebediah Springfield in these lines of dialogue:
Jebediah: [on film] A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man.
Edna: Embiggens? I never heard that word before I moved to Springfield
Ms. Hoover: I don't know why. It's a perfectly cromulent word.
Here's how Kachru used the word in his article:
While in both cases for P anti-D3-branes the probe approximation is clearly not good, in the set up of this paper we could argue that there is a competing effect which can overcome the desire of the anti-D3s to embiggen, namely their attraction towards the wrapped D5s. Hence, also on the gravity side, the non-supersymmetric states would naively be meta-stable.
This isn't the first time joke words have made their way into usage. I think the words "hornswoggle" and "absquatulate" started out as jokes, invented by people in the midwest. But now they appear in many dictionaries.
Comments
Wikipedia:
The word was originally coined by Murray Gell-Mann as a nonsense word rhyming with "pork".[1] Later, he found the same word in James Joyce's book Finnegans Wake, where seabirds give "three quarks", akin to three cheers (probably onomatopoeically imitating a seabird call, like "quack" for ducks, as well as making a pun on the relationship between Munster and its provincial capital, Cork) in the passage "Three quarks for Muster Mark!/Sure he has not got much of a bark/And sure any he has it's all beside the mark." Further explanation for the use of the word "quark" may be derived from the fact that, at the time, there were only three known quarks in existence.
'When I gave a draft of one of the papers using this word to Joe Polchinski [of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara] and asked him to among other things to comment on the referencing in the paper, he replied "Your referencing looks perfectly cromulent."'
Simpsonites shall know each other by the cromulence of their linguistifucation!
But...scientists picked up on it, and started to use it, and now flange is the official collective noun for a bunch of baboons.
(The original is on YouTube, BTW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MpbMm0433I)
My father, as part of a 28-page assignment wrote, at the bottom, 'I have included the word 'potato' in this paper three times. If you cannot tell me where, I will know you have not read my paper.'
The joke being, of course, that there were only two 'potato's hidden in the body of the text. The third being in the sentence at the bottom. He got a B+ and a 'you vicious little git'.
The word was 'quiz'.
i love words. Sometime they just have the most bizarre beginnings.
The real origin of 'quiz' was as an acronym used by 18th cenbtry naval naturalists to qualify tentative records of sightings of possibly misidentified sea-creatures: it stood for 'Questionable, Uncertain, or Ingenious Zoography'. With the advent of more professional observing and recording techniques (as pioneered by Darwin, Huxley, and so on) the term fell out of use in zoology (or 'zoography' as it was then known), though it had by that point entered the language in the sense we know today.
An interesting side note: a secondary and now archaic meaning of 'quiz' was 'foolish persoin', like 'buffoon' or 'numbskull'; this arose from the way the new generation of naturalists derided their amateurish and incompetent forbears as 'quizzes' or 'quizzers', based on their overuse of this imprecise term*.
*Historical fact.
So there's no way that "quiz" ever stood for "Questionable, Uncertain, or Ingenious Zoography." I wish it had because it's a fun story, but alas, it is not to be. In the same way, golf and sh*t certainly didn't start as acronyms either. Any of those stories you hear that start out with the assumption that a word that began before the 20th century began as an acronym are wrong wrong wrong.
Quinion says that as is so often the case with word origins, those for "quiz" are uncertain. He says, "It was first recorded in the late 1700s, in the sense of an odd or eccentric person. Later it became another word for a joke or a witticism and only about the middle of the nineteenth century did it take on the modern meaning of a more-or-less formal set of questions."
I'm curious to see what he makes of "embiggen," but there's nothing on his website so far.
Lewis Carroll apparently did invent "chortle," though, at least according to Quinion and other language gurus that I've read.
"...but the people magnified them, to make great or embiggen, if we may invent an English parallel as ugly. After all, use is nearly everything."
Although the writers of the Simpsons did not know that at the time.
Also, "cromulent" is entirely their invention as far as anybody can tell.