11points.com has posted a list of
11 photos where black people were awkwardly photoshopped in or out. Most of them I've seen before. A few of them I even have on this site. But there was one I hadn't seen before. It's titled "Photoshopped diversity in a Lebanon refugee camp." 11points provides this description:
In the summer of 2006, this photo ran in the New York Times and is a very important lesson about photojournalism. If you're going to Photoshop a black guy into a Lebanese refugee camp for one of the world's most respected newspapers, at least take the time to really smooth out the edges around his head.
They provide a link to
rightwinged.com, which offers a fuller analysis. Basically, the black man in the lower-right corner has a strange outline around his head, which (so rightwinged.com has concluded) is the result of a really bad cut-and-paste job.
I'm not so sure. That outline could also be caused by someone standing behind him. And if it was photoshopped, the photographer did a really good job of blending the guy's head into the photo in every other way (such as lighting and color-tone), making it odd that he would have made a mistake as obvious as forgetting to smooth out the edges around the man's head. Finally, what would have been the point of photoshopping this guy into the picture?
In any case, it's been almost three years since this photo
ran in the NY Times, and they haven't yet pulled it from their site, so evidently they don't think it's photoshopped.
Comments
But why the hell would anyone want to photoshop a black guy into such a picture?
But more disturbing is "Picture 6 The white ghost in the machine" on 11points.com. So it's a pic of a girl with a laptop sitting on the lawn and smiling at the camera. On the screen of the laptop is a "reflection" of a white girl.
I've got two big problems with this. And suspect it's a fake fake.
1) The reflection is at the wrong angle if the black girl was photo'ed in.
but the main one is...
2) The image on the laptop screen is supposed to be a reflection so why can you read the name of the university the right way around (ie not backwards?) on the top the white chick is wearing?
Sometimes you get odd-lookin edges on object with (unmamipulated) digital photography.
What seems odd to me about the man in question is that his head seems much bigger than anyone else's in the photo. But that could be a trick of perspective. So I, vote "undetermined" on this one.
There'd be no need for ghosts if nor photoshop if the black girl in photo 6 were watching a video of someone wearing the university sweater.
This would also explain why the university's name is not in mirror image 😊
Here's a theory: Maybe this man is a relief worker for a U.N agency. He was supposed to be at work at the refugee camp that day, but he went to the movies instead. So he pasted himself into the picture to send to his bosses.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-york-times-busted-in-hezbollah.html
Thanks, nice point, (although why anyone would watch a video of a fairly "ordinary" white girl wearing a university sweat-top is beyond me)
@Maegan,
I'm opting for a smiling lady who was deemed out-of-place. And had her head pasted over. I can't think of any-other reason... (and people do smile even in really horrible situations)
The "added" guy might just have been what they had available...
It almost seems like the Sarah Palin photos in Runner's World were photoshopped too - she's in incredible shape for her age. Next they just need to Photoshop her into doing something intelligent for a change!
Ho ho, but that was a cheap joke, at the expense of a cheap Alaskan Crook. I know the people up there like to maintain how independent and free they are...which is usually a cover up from being a bunch of thugs, looking to get away with just about anything they can. Especially since she's investigated a half dozen times by ethics committees and had to spend over $200,000 of the taxpayer's money on lawyers to keep her out of jail, because we can't have our political leaders going to the Slammer - it would mean they were accountable for their actions to the people they are supposed to be representing, and we just can't have that...but enough of that.
I wonder how many photos that make it onto the news wires are faked? It could get creepy - I understand some work is necessary, in order to unblur lines and so forth, but a lot of people will take things for gospel as long as it runs in the newspapers.