Status: Real
Science has long recognized the existence of the
fur-bearing trout, which lives in the rivers and lakes of North America. Now its Pacific cousin has been found: the fur-bearing lobster (scientific name
Kiwa hirsuta).
According to the BBC,
"A US-led team found the animal last year in waters 2,300m (7,540ft) deep at a site 1,500km (900 miles) south of Easter Island, an expert has claimed. Details appear in the journal of Paris' National Museum of Natural History."
So what is the purpose of the fur? Scientists speculate that
"the 'hairy' pincers contained lots of filamentous bacteria... The bacteria detoxify poisonous minerals from the water, allowing K. hirsuta to survive around the vents."
An interesting theory, but it seems to me more logical to assume that its luxuriant coat developed to protect it from the cold waters of the depths, as is the case with the fur-bearing trout.
[Note: Despite what the above text might imply, fur-bearing trout are a tall-tale. Furry lobsters are real.]
(Thanks to Kathy for the link)
Comments
Looks tasty, how long before this ends up at Red Lobster?
Sorry I'll try that link again.
I laughed because somebody took Alex seriously about the fur being for heat. Remember, kids, thermal vents or not, fur keeps animals warm by trapping AIR to create a layer of insulation against skin. This doesn't work in water, needless (?) to say. The sea otter is the exception because its fur is so silly thick that it is able to trap air for warmth and buoyancy.
Far more importantly, the animal has to warm up the trapped air, meaning the animal needs to be warm-blooded. You could zip a spacesuit around a lobster and it will remain cold forever.
One more thing - if fur was important for warmth ya think it might grow on the actual body instead of just the extremities? Just a thought.
I LOVE this web site.
Well hey, maybe it's just his little claws that get cold. Didja ever think of that??? :cheese:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/03/0309_060309_yeti_crab.html