FlexPetz is a San Diego-based company that allows people to rent out dogs by the day. So if you want to be able to take a dog to the beach on the weekend, but you don't have time to care for it during the week, this is the service for you. Marlena Cervantes, the founder of the company, doesn't like the term "rent-a-pet," according to
this AP article. Instead, she likes to think of what she's offering as "shared pet ownership." The service is quite pricey, but it's doubtless cheaper than caring for a dog yourself for its entire life.
As soon as I read about this company, I thought about the many "rent-a-something" type hoaxes that have been reported here over the years, such as:
Rent my Son,
Rent a Wife,
Rent a Negro,
Rent a Midget,
Rent a German, and
Rent a Dildo.
However, I'm pretty sure FlexPetz is not a hoax. Though many might think that it's such a bad idea they would prefer it was a hoax.
My first reaction was to be appalled. Pets, to my way of thinking, are part of the family. They're not something to be rented on the weekend. But the more I've thought about it, the more I've started to grudgingly accept the idea of this company, because if you want a pet but you're not sure if you can take care of it for its entire life, renting one
would be better than buying one and later trying to get rid of it. (via
Art of the Prank)
Comments
And I'm not sure what to make of this:
"dogs are fitted with GPS-tracking collars to ensure we can locate the dog...device is only activated when you call our customer service number who can then give you up to the second information on the dog's location"
As far as I am aware, GPS tracking only tells you where the device is, and is not a magical two-way communicator, although maybe there is something small enough to fit on a collar that would work?
Not sure that follows logically. I rent out my kids on a regular basis, and know a few other people who do so too.
It's amazing how many people want to be parents for the day but not for life, and the rental service I provide saves such people from having children and just giving thgem up for adoption or leaving them in the baby box when they find out how much work is involved.
Plus it saves on babysitting fees, and since such surrogate parents always want to do fun stuff it's great for the kids, too.
Maybe I should have been more specific in my first reply. Personally, it's something *I* wouldn't be keen on doing myself with my children or other family members.
My wife and I are actually in the process of trying to get pregnant right now, because she has some pretty severe female problems, and if we don't try now, we may never be able to have biological children. So we're gonna give it a good effort.
Because they'd mug the Scotsman instead???
Parents pay for babysitting and babysitters pay instead of getting paid.
If they were, why wouldn't they openly provide phone numbers and street addresses for their local facilities?
Also, I don't see anyone paying this kind of money just to have the ability to spend time with a dog. I love dogs, but if I couldn't own one (or two in my case), I wouldn't pay over $1,000 per year to spend time with them...
Where it might be fun for a human to have a dog for a day I don't think a dog would understand or enjoy being shuttled from stranger to stranger. They just want a home to settle down in and be part of a "pack".
you should check out this webiste that will help you become a better petlover.
http://www.anamigo.com
The Next Step For You and Your Pet
i have consulted few real estate business people to buy piece of land and they said me rate but when i inquired about the land from others, i came to know that they told me Rs 3 lakhs more than the original price. for each and every thing will have to give account to god.