Status: Publishers hoaxed
Convinced that the publishing industry can no longer recognize quality literature when they see it, the Sunday Times devised an experiment to test their theory. They submitted opening chapters of books by V.S. Naipaul and Stanley Middleton to twenty publishers and agents.
The results:
None appears to have recognised them as Booker prizewinners from the 1970s that were lauded as British novel writing at its best. Of the 21 replies, all but one were rejections. Only Barbara Levy, a London literary agent, expressed an interest, and that was for Middleton’s novel. She was unimpressed by Naipaul’s book. She wrote: “We . . . thought it was quite original. In the end though I’m afraid we just weren’t quite enthusiastic enough to be able to offer to take things further.” The rejections for Middleton’s book came from major publishing houses such as Bloomsbury and Time Warner as well as well-known agents such as Christopher Little, who discovered J K Rowling.
This isn't surprising. I don't think many publishers or agents look closely at work from unknown authors. This also isn't the first time an experiment like this has been conducted. The article mentions that Doris Lessing once submitted a novel to her own publisher under a pseudonym, and it was rejected. And back in 2000, a French Magazine called Voici sent a thinly disguised version of L'Institutrice (The Primary School Teacher) by
Claire Chazal (who's a celebrity French newswoman) to Plon publishing house. Plon rejected it, which was embarrassing for them since they publish it, and therefore should have recognized it.
Comments
Most publishers will specialize in certain areas. Almost all editors say the most common reason for rejection is not that the book or article is no good, it's that it doesn't fit the needs of that particular publisher. If you specialize in Sports and Recreation, it's not likely you would pay much attention to someone who submitted War and Peace. I heard of a publisher that received an excellent book submission about "money saving tips for homeless people". The editor really liked the book but rejected it because homeless people don't buy books.
Even this article recognized most editors are overwhelmed with submissions. I could understand it if someone received an obviously plagerized manuscript, they may not bother to write the "author" to tell them that. They would just fill out the standard rejection form letter or not respond at all. Why waste your time?
"I received one death threat, postmarked Norristown, the location of Pennsylvania's largest insane asylum." - George Scithers, editor at Weird Tales"
see URL link for rest of article
http://tinyurl.com/d62ex