Elliot's newest contribution in the Hoaxipedia is an entry about the career of the art forger
Elmer de Hory.
And I also posted an article about something from the world of art:
September Morn by Paul Chabas.
September Morn shows a young naked girl bathing at the edge of a lake. In the early twentieth century it provoked a huge controversy in America about whether nudity should be allowed in public art. The controversy helped make September Morn one of the most famous (and popular) paintings in the world.
The interesting part of the story is that publicist Harry Reichenbach later claimed to have started the whole controversy by staging a phony protest... pretending to be outraged in order to attract the notice of the censors, but in reality just trying to drum up publicity so as to sell more copies of the painting.
I have my doubts about Reichenbach's story, especially since he only started taking credit for the September Morn controversy years after it happened.
Comments
I've read his autobiography, Phantom Fame (a pretty hard book to find these days. I finally managed to find a copy of it after years of looking.) and he certainly tells the story in it and takes credit for the fame of September Morn.
Where did you hear or read that Reichenbach possibly made up the story after the fact, Alex?
I can't understand why he would even have been working for an art dealer in 1913, as he claimed.
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1973/6/1973_6_4.shtml
He says he was broke and walking past the art store in Brooklyn when he spotted reproductions of September Morn in the window on sale for ten cents each, if I remember correctly. He walked in, introduced himself and asked if the proprietor would pay him to help him sell the many copies of the painting he had on hand.
Obviously, the store owner said "yes," Reichenbach made his famous call to Constock and the rest is (allegedly) history.
I'm doing this from memory but I'm sure it's essentially what Reichenbach says in Phantom Fame.