Status: True (in my opinion)
Here's a bit of a mystery. I received an email from someone called Prastil who wrote, "Check this hoax out:
DaVinciGrail.com." The site he directed me to claims that the holy grail has finally been discovered in Da Vinci's painting of the Last Supper. For centuries people have wondered why Da Vinci omitted the grail from his painting, given that the grail is one of the central elements of the Last Supper story. Its absence has spawned a variety of theories, such as the one elaborated in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, that the holy grail was Mary Magdalene's uterus (and that the figure to the left of Jesus in the painting is Mary Magdalene). But DaVinciGrail.com claims that Da Vinci actually did include the grail in his painting, if you look hard enough. He concealed it as a symbol on the wall above the head of St. Bartholomew, the disciple at the extreme left. (I highlighted the cup in the image below).
It may seem a bit farfetched that after centuries someone discovered a detail in the Last Supper that no one had ever seen before, but as far as I can tell, that's the case. The man who noticed the grail in the painting was Gary Phillips, a Michigan computer programmer (and cryptologist). He was aided in his discovery by the fact that the painting was recently cleaned, revealing details previously concealed by dirt and grime. Of course, Phillips could be seeing a shape that was not intentionally placed there by Da Vinci, but once you see the cup, it seems so obvious that it's hard to believe it wasn't placed there on purpose. The legitimacy of Phillips's claim to have discovered this hidden detail is noted on a number of sites, such as
About.com's Art History blog.
Now here's where things get strange. Phillips has nothing to do with DaVinciGrail.com. Instead, Phillips maintains a separate site called
Realm of Twelve. DaVinciGrail.com is registered to (drumroll, please) Prastil, the same guy who emailed me telling me that the site was a hoax. Why did Prastil claim his site was a hoax? Was he trying to get me to write about his site, not thinking that I would check the domain registration? I have no idea (and I wrote about it anyway). But Phillips's discovery of the grail hidden as a symbol on the wall in The Last Supper seems real enough to me... unless there's some part of the story that I'm not clued in to. (Very possible.)
Comments
and:
or maybe it was getting washed because it fell on the floor.
I agree with Accipiter. The grail was simply the vessel that Christ used at the last supper. There's no reason to believe that it would be anything other than an ordinary cup. Didn't anyone see Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
I don't think it's a hoax so much as wishful thinking.
🐛
😊
http://milano.arounder.com/category/fullscreen/IT000005356.html
It turns out to be a vaguely-grail-shaped piece of detail on the pillar (or whatever it is) behind him.
When you look at pre-restoration versions, these are *not* depicted as the artist originally intended. Through the centuries, the paintings were 'repaired' and sometimes intentionally altered for various reasons.
The post-restoration version of The Last Supper is, in my opinion, much closer to the original than before.
For some of Leonardo's comments regarding his art, please visit the Holy Grail (Sangreal) page on my web site http://www.realmoftwelve.net.
(and thank you, webmaster, for the link)
gary
*cries as his brain implodes*
If you think that the Bible is 100% true, it would pay mind to remember that even the Dead Sea Scrolls are owned by and only tranlasted by Catholics, who throughout mid history would kill anyone with a different view; doesn't killing because of an opinion go against the Bible's teaching? They used the Bible as a way to govern and control a populus and get rich.
Truth is what (you make) people believe, not what necessarily actually is. President Bush does it all the time...
Also, there is a chance that the person on Jesus' right could be John. You decide.
John the Baptist
Also, Plato pointing his finger.
Plato
Oops, the Plato image got cut off.
http://home.arcor.de/berzelmayr/st-john.html
-- posted by Brian Apr. 20th
As far as I know, the stuff painted in the arched tympanum things aren't actually a part of "The Last Supper". The hall that has that painting in the end has these little shields and letters painted elsewhere along the top of its walls. I expect that they were painted by some other artist, perhaps in commemoration of something or another.
It's hard to see some of the letters, and I have no idea what they could be abbreviating, but here is what I can see of them. On the left side of the leftmost tympanum, from top to bottom, is "M", "SE", and "CO", and on the right side are "MX", "AN", and "PP". In the middle tympanum is "LV", "BE", "SE", and "DV", then "[possibly A]A", "[something]S[something]", and "AN". On the far right tympanum is painted "SF", "DVX", and then finally "AN" and "BA[possibly R or P]". I could be wrong on some of those letters; many are difficult to see. They remind me of the abbreviations for the names of saints that are often shown on religious icons, though.
then you have to keep in mind that that's not really what Da Vinci painted. What he painted looks more like this, in the restored version:
If you want a nice view of the restored painting, you can go to http://milano.arounder.com/category/fullscreen/IT000005356.html and look at it.
And this is the robot:
I'm just not seeing it.
-- posted by laura
Firstly: the picture doesn't form an "M". What it forms is
and you're simply taking an arbitrary section of that. You could also look elsewhere and say that the people at the table form the letter "W", "U", "I", "J", "L", "Z", "V", "C", or "N" quite easily, and make good cases for most of the other letters in the alphabet, too. And that's just going with the Roman alphabet; if you go into the Greek or Hebrew, you can find even more.
Secondly: even if it does form an "M", so what? Is that supposed to mean something?
Oh wait, they did. I guess some people can't be bothered to read what came before them.
It's still a myth.