Status: Real
Zkato wants to know if the fossil of fighting dinosaurs found on the website of the
Nakasato dinosaur Center is real. The fossil does sound a little too good to be true:
One Protoceratops, a herbivorous (plant-eating) dinosaur, perished in the struggle with a carnivorous theropod, Velociraptor. After their death 80 million years ago, both skeletons were fossilized, then finally unearthed in 1971 in fully articulated forms without having been smashed.
However, not only is it real, it's one of the most famous fossils in the world. It was found in Mongolia in 1971, and was exhibited in 2000 at the
American Museum of Natural History. An episode of Discovery Channel's
Dinosaur Planet included a computer-graphic reconstruction of the struggle between the protoceratops and the velociraptor. The fighting dinosaur website seems to be circulating around right now because someone linked to it on
digg.com.
The big mystery is how the two dinosaurs managed to get buried alive while fighting. Dinosaur Planet's theory is that "the animals were most likely fighting on a rain-soaked sand dune which collapsed preserving them mid-battle." Or they could have gotten stuck in a sudden sandstorm. A few other theories are outlined in a post on
cryptozoology.com.
Comments
The two skeletons can easily be completely unrelated to each other in terms of time and moment of death and fossilization. They only appear to be related because of the very poor resolution of the typical archaeological/palaeontological/geological record, which creates a spatio-temporal collapse of non-synchronic things and events. In fact, it is most likely they are not related at all. This is basic taphonomic law. In my field of science (archaeology), the naive assumption that things found together are part of one synchronic event is called the "Pompeii Premise".
So my opinion as a professional archaeologist is: "bullshit, and an extreme case of a 'Pompeii Premise'."
http://www.thunderbolts.info
Thats geological evidence, stuff you can find in the ground. Real and compelling evidence.
Not a book.
Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I can't believe anyone would say that a collapsing dune is more implausable than a world wide flood.