Status: Fake
Dave forwarded me this email he received (which, he noted, was dated April 1, so it seemed a bit suspicious to him). The subject line of the email reads:
DEEP-SPACE PHOTO: EP_4277. The text reads:
The subject of this photo is a very rare one indeed - taken by NASA with the Hubble space telescope. This is the only documented existence of a binary king galaxy in our known universe.
Astronomy is definitely not my expertise. I wouldn't even be able to find the Big Dipper on a clear night. So although I know what a binary galaxy is (two galaxies orbiting each other), I have no idea what a 'binary king galaxy' is. (A google search pulls up nothing for the term.) I was able to find out that the Hubble space telescope has photographed binary galaxies. For instance, see
this BBC article from 1999. But the 1999 image of a binary galaxy looks nothing like the image in Dave's email. So is the picture Dave sent really a Hubble space telescope image of the only binary king galaxy known to astronomers? I have no idea.
Update: Thanks to Brian T. who found
the original image, lacking the 'binary king galaxy,' on the Hubble website, thereby proving that the above image is a fake. Now the question is, why did someone fake this? If it's a joke, I don't get it.
Comments
http://www.jcracingteam.com/eye_of_god.htm
Check the picture, it's on Snopes somewhere as well. Real galaxy, duplicated and monkeyed about with.
Also the "eye of God" is not a galaxy. It's a planetary nebula, the remains of a star after its been through its life. In fact the Helix Nebula (known as the Eye of God to some") is in our own galaxy!
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope webpage is at http://hubblesite.org/ if anybody with a faster computer than mine wants to sift through it (it takes me at least five minutes just to open a small image). I did searches on it, though, for "binary king galaxies", "binary ring galaxies", "binary king galaxy", "binary ring galaxy", "king galaxy", "ring galaxy", "deep-space photo EP_4277", "EP_4277", "EP-4277", and "EP4277" without finding that image.
Additionally, the designations commonly attached to deep space pictures are applied to the things in the image, not the picture itself. For example, NGC6020 would refer to an object in a picture, not the picture itself. I am not aware of the EP catalogue.
Also these galaxies, unless they were line of sight only (which means one is literally monsterous comparied to the other, and would more likely be an eliptical galaxy than a spiral galaxy) would be merging if they were really that close. In the image, their spiral arms aren't even slightly warped by the other's position. The structure looks wrong as well, I highly doubt it'd have such a large center and tiny little spiral arms like that, it should be distributed more in the spiral arms instead of this mass in the middle. It looks like some hideous hybrid between an eliptical and spiral galaxy.
For two galaxies to look almost EXACTLY the same is impossible. Additionally, the centers of the galaxies would NOT be blue, commonly ascioated with reflection nebulae. It would be VERY, VERY BRIGHT since this is is where the majority of stars eventually sit in galaxies as well as theoretical black holes.
If you take a look at how galaxies are thought to form, and view pictures of other non-bared spiral galaxies, you'll see this simply cannot occur.
http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/the_universe_collection/pr2004016c/
Brian
http://www.messybeast.com/freak-conjoined.htm
about halfway down the page there is a blurb "Mistaken diagnosis of conjoined kittens". In the article it calls animals fused together "king" ie. "king rats" and "squirrel kings". Perhaps the term "Binary King Galaxy" is the hoaxsters way of saying the two galaxies are stuck together. Thanks for the entertainment.
Rotate the image 90 degrees counter-clockwise and adjust the brightness and contrast so that the interstellar "dust" comes plainly into view.
EP 42 [19]77
There's your King!
I did what you said and here's what I got: