|
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 > |
evidentviper
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 | 10:58 AM
I saw it but I think they only bought a portion of the tape. and I do agree with you that it is blurry. Nothing like The Paterson film. |
buba
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 | 02:34 PM
yeah, check out the "bigfoot" thread. |
Papazombie
|
Posted: Fri May 06, 2005 | 06:54 PM
Here is a thought for you folks. If Big Foot (Nessie, Yeti, Champ, etc..) really exist how come we have never in all the years we have been chasing them (fruitlessly)we have never found a corpse of one? All we have are easy to make foot prints and plaster castings of said prints, and fuzzy (always fuzzy / poor quality) videos and photos? 😏
IE: Gaint squid. We haven't found one that I'm aware of but we know they exist because we have found huge squid tentacles(sp? 😖 ) in the stomach contents of Sperm Whales, who are known to travel to amazing depths that we cant get to yet.(that I know of) 😉 |
Wippit
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 12:20 AM
We've never found a bigfoot corpse. OK.
Go find me a bear corpse that has died of natural causes. I wish you luck. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 03:39 AM
I never found a bear corpse (no bear here) but I did dig up Pleistocene bear remains.
By the way, remains of giant squid have been found. Several have washed ashore. |
Evildream
in You mamas house
Member
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 07:11 AM
http://64.70.39.65:80/bigfoot_2_small.wmv
your welcome
..... |
English Teacher
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 10:22 AM
AHEM!!!
That would be:
You're welcome
Not:
Your welcome |
Karrie
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 10:28 AM
*Rolls Eyes*
my god, can't you leave it Alone? |
English Teacher
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 10:30 AM
WHAT?!?!?!?
EvilDream spelled it wrong! |
fred
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 10:48 AM
Two giant squid washed up on the shores of a community just hours away from me last year in newfoundland. they were allways thought to be a mythical creature or a figment of someones imagination.Bigfoot is out there somewhere |
Evildream
in You mamas house
Member
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 03:13 PM
shut up grammar nazi |
Eric
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 03:17 PM
Well, here's the way I see it. I don't belive in bigfoot one way or another until someone has a body...(or a leg...or something)
And this seems to be another Blobsquatch. I am by no means pro bigfoot killin'. But I wish a bigfoot would hurry up and attack so someone would at least have an excuse to shoot or tranquilize it. (Though that would be awkward if it work up in the back of some hunters truck)
Yeah. This video proves jacksh** |
English Teacher
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 | 03:42 PM
Re: Evildream
I take deep offense!
😉 |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 | 04:31 AM
Hmm, not too impressive. Could be Rod the Lumberjack. |
sean Hayes
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2005 | 05:47 PM
Im from northern Ontario right up near manitoba, its only few hours drive and ive been to where this video of bigfoot was supposedly shot. While you guys are right for being sceptical the area is incredibly remote and there have been stories by locals ive talked to of something in those woods resembling whats shot on that film. Im not saying thats bigfoot but from my personal experiance in the area( where i stayed for a few weeks one summer to fish)and hearing the locals stories dating back some 10 years the probability of this bing bigfoot is closer than any sighting or video ive seen or heard.
By the way I really didnt believe in bigfoot untill i saw the video and where it was shot, its really creepy stuff. |
buba
Member
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 | 07:45 AM
Papazombie said:"Here is a thought for you folks. If Big Foot (Nessie, Yeti, Champ, etc..) really exist how come we have never in all the years we have been chasing them (fruitlessly)we have never found a corpse of one?"
because its a hoax, we are talking about it in a hoax forum. or are you just preaching to the choir? |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 | 09:45 AM
Duh! B/c the aliens beam them aboard their star ships. |
SnapOutOfit
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 | 01:57 PM
Are you all on crack - this video sucks, poorest quality I've ever seen....hell, it could have been a black fly on the camera lense!!! |
carb0n
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 08:14 AM
Looks like a bear taking a leak to me. |
sconny botland
in Scotland
Member
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 08:29 AM
Why did the person who made this not focus the camera? |
Reynard Muldrake
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 09:54 AM
It just looked like a blurry, moving shadow. |
john
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 11:29 AM
Too bad this video seems like a bunch of crap. I was excited when I first heard about it, but the fact that it was shown on "A Current Affair" makes me wonder... might as well just go for it and have a "Fear-Factor: Models vs. Sasquatch" episode. |
Papazombie
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 06:54 PM
Thanks Fred. That helps prove my point. First we had rumors/ legends of Gaint Squid, then we find bits and pieces of them (read : Some possible proof) then we find the remains of them washed up on shore one day (read: proof).
😊
Wippit - did you put any thought to your response? Or are you just suffering from teenage angst? If I spend the rest of my life looking for a rare animal, one that exists, I would eventualy come across one or the remains of one, or someone else will find it instead. I as yet do not know when the first reported Bigfoot sighting was but I do know it has been hunted for a LONG TIME, by a LOT OF PEOPLE and NO ONE has found any remains/corpses (read : physcial proof) All we have is blury photos, questionable videos and easy to make foot print casts. And what in the Name Of All That Is Still Good does the cause of death have to do with physcial remains? A corpse is a corpse is a corpse.
Buba, of course I know its all a hoax and Bigfoot/Yeti/Champ etc are just stories. I was just bringing up some valid logic.
Maybe I should have catered to the lowest common denominator.... 😖 |
Papazombie
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2005 | 06:56 PM
Thanks as well Lama.
:cheese: |
buba
Member
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 | 07:35 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4534871.stm
one reason its so easy to hoax from the BBC: "The creature is one of about 30 varieties of titi monkey which can be found in the dense tropical rainforests of South America. There's Callicebus brunneus (Brown titi), Callicebus personatus (Masked titi), Callicebus moloch (Dusky titi) and then there's the new arrival, Callicebus aureipalatii - Golden Palace titi.
This latest species had the dubious fate of being discovered in an era of strident global capitalism - hence its name, the result of a charity auction eventually won by the online gambling emporium GoldenPalace.com.
Novelty names aside, though, it's surprising that on a planet which has been so comprehensively researched, circumnavigated and trampled over there are still new sorts of primate which have evaded human detection." |
Dude the Unbeliever
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 | 09:44 AM
<em>Go find me a bear corpse that has died of natural causes. I wish you luck.</em>
Go talk to any number of naturalists, bush pilots, hunters, RCMP officers or biologist and they will tell you that, yes, bear remains do in fact exist. People who work in the bush find physical remains of all kinds of animals, and no large bipedal creature can stay hidden in North America for long.
I used to stumble upon the remains of large mammals while hiking well far north of Norway House as a kid. We have never found *any* pysical evidence of sasquatch in hundreds of years. Sure, we find new species occasionally. Rarely do we find new mammal species (it just happened recently, the first in decades) and almost always the species are in highly specific microenvironments (e.g., deep ocean, rain forest canopies.)
For any population of large bipeds to be around for more than one generation we'd need a critical number of individuals. This number could be as high as thousands. That many individuals would just have to be found. The longer we don't find physical evidence, the more we can be sure that these things do not exist.
It should be noted that the some in the cryptozoologist community who want to believe in sasquatch so bad have taken to explaining away the lack of physical evidence by making claims that bigfoot is "interdimensional" so it can't leave (or chooses not to leave) physical evidence.
I don't know about you, but this kind of weak thinking makes my bullshit detector go off the scale. In technical terms, these guys are "making shit up." |
Papazombie
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2005 | 05:15 PM
..."interdimensional"... :lol:
That's great. That ties up the mystery in a nice, neat little bow. Heh,heh,heh, love it. Maybe he will show up at that time traveller party too. :cheese: |
Reynard Muldrake
|
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 | 08:18 PM
Here's a possibility to explain the lack of bodies... What if they bury their dead? I'm not saying they exist, but who the heck knows.
And I think it's just one guy who's claiming they're interdimensional. There used to be a webpage about it, but I can't find it anymore. There's apparently a book, though. |
Trib Town
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 09:36 AM
You're all idiots, everyone knows that sasquatch would not leave its corpse laying around for someone to find, then everyone would know its there. Big Foot shows himself when/if he has to to stay in the minds of the public. Also, the fact is that Nessies, Abominable Snowmen and such creatures live in remote places that make it impossible for us to find them and give them the advantage when we go looking for them.
Either they're smarter than us or they're extinct, nuff said !! |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 09:50 AM
Trib, try to be calm.
'Nessies' would live in Loch Ness. That is, after all, why they're called 'Nessies'. That's if they existed. Which they don't.
You've never seen the immense tourist trade around Loch Ness, have you? Remote places, my bum. |
Trib Town
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 02:13 PM
Course i've seen loch ness.... i'm an urquhart, urquhart castle is supposed to be above an underwater tunnel that connects the loch to the ocean, thats y nessie has never been seen. The sasquatches are obviously out there. From california to northern manitoba people see these things that aren't bears and aren't people. So if u have a better explanation of what the hell is that f*cking big walking around in the woods i'd like to hear it pal.. sorry for the profanity but it gets on my nerves when people can't just believe for the sake of the myth, like santa clause, you wouldn't tell a 5 year old that santa and the easter bunny aren't real.... |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 03:45 PM
what; Santa and the Easter Bunny aren't real...????? :ohh: |
big D
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 08:12 PM
:grrr: this person is an idiot! like what the fuck did he have a fisher price camera he didnet zoom in becase he is a fucking native he was probably shit drunk at the time |
big d again
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 | 08:17 PM
the reason no one has found any bigfoot dead is because the big foot spicies, nessi and a hole bunch of alines are geting ripped in an under water cave right now |
buba
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 | 01:27 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4562589.stm
A previously unknown monkey species has been found in the mountains of southern Tanzania.
There may only be a thousand individuals left. |
Fender Washburn
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 | 08:19 PM
I have come across bear carci, as well as many other forest creature's.
I live in the heart of Bigfoot Country (not too far from where the hoax Patterson tape was shot, Trinity County Calif.).
Out here, we LOVE Bigfoot, or more properly the $ brought in by gullible seachers.
A few days ago a neighbor (one of the few believers out here) who said he came upon some Bigfoot tracks once.
"Fakes" I opined.
"Why would someone go to the trouble of making fake tracks?", he asked.
I answered with "why do people go to the trouble of making crop circles?"
In other words, to fool gullible people. |
Mera
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 | 01:09 AM
The giant squid must prove bigfoot true thing is pretty stupid to me. Sorry, but we can walk across land, and thus it is easy to traverse all hidden areas, and two, bigfoot does not live thousands of feet below where we have easy access.
oh... and if the bigfoot race burried their dead, we could still find them. I mean... how else do we find the graves of Egyptians, indians, and other humans?
At least nessie can hide in areas we aren't as proficient at searching such as the ocean/deep lakes. Bigfoot out in a forest would have been discovered long ago.
and yes, we DO discover new species. Note how in the past hundred years none have been discovered that reach over 5 feet. Well... maybe a few variations in semi-inhabitated areas of foreign countries, but not in North America I do believe. and like some have mentioned... when so many search for a creature... reamains are bound to show up IF it exists. |
Reynard Muldrake
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 | 04:24 PM
"the reason no one has found any bigfoot dead is because the big foot spicies, nessi and a hole bunch of alines are geting ripped in an under water cave right now"
I'll buy that.
"if the bigfoot race burried their dead, we could still find them. I mean... how else do we find the graves of Egyptians, indians, and other humans?"
But aren't those marked? Maybe the bigfoots just bury them and then cover them up without making them visible... or maybe there are secret bigfoot burial grounds hidden away where no one's stumbled on them yet... or maybe they're buried outside of this dimension. |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 | 04:50 PM
The BigFoot carry their dead to hidden sites, and allow nature to strip the bones bare, which they then crush into a fine powder. They handle their dead with great respect, and use the powdered bones to mark their sacred and secret grounds. The BigFoot are as intelligent as Humans. They Are Humans, just as we are they, just a tad different. Some of us are closer to them than we realize, in physionomy, and attitude. They are pretty laid back, shy, but proud. They have lived here for thousands of years, but have always been subtle in their presence. They feel great emotion like Humans, but tend to respond better to elemental forces, of which they are keenly aware. They will never be our friends, but always our neighbors. You can see their signs, if you look. Npot all game trails you may see are made by deer, or rabbits and such. They may have Big Feet, but they tred lightly if possible. You'll smell a BigFoot well before you see one. They think we smell bad, too. That's probably why they avoid us. I can't say that I've actually seen a BigFoot, but I got most of my info on them from my friend, The Chupacabra. I asked him once if he thought I might actually be a latent BigFoot, instead of a full-blown Lycanthrope. He gave me the 411 on the BigFoot people, and that pretty well excluded me. In all of my Lunar-provoked madness, I've never grown real tall, and got Big Feet. I don't actually even physically transform in any way, that I know of, I just enter an accellerated state of awareness and anxiety. The Moon has many charms to stoke the savage Hair(y). Lycanthropes can party with The BigFoot people, but just not around the Full Moon. Llamas will party with you any time, Moon or not, but them BigFoot folks, they're kinda like The Amish. |
wonderfulwes
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 | 04:48 PM
b/c i wiped out my sk8 board in the park the other day and twisted my ankle, i think i'll go step in the clay and make some prints..lol
but i mean i haven't seen alot of things and i still believe in some of them like dolly parton's fun bags
sasquach is smart 2 b so reclusive(applogies 4 my spelling schul wasn't my thing)as there r people who r just waiting 2 strap his carcass 2 thier roof.who is the real monster?
ask some loggers in northern alberta or bc about it they r there and more hummaine if not humman than we r |
Kristi
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 | 06:46 PM
come on people lets leave this stuff to the experts and get on with our lives |
Lampshade
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 | 07:02 PM
there are experts? they just told me that they ate them all years ago. They remind me of Orcs... |
Hoos
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 | 11:54 PM
This video is baaaad! there is no bigfoot get over it! as far as Im concerned its the guy's cousin dressed in black. and for heaven's sake if ur doing a bigfoot video get a flippin god camera with autozoom and autofocus and all that stuff! |
dolphin
|
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 | 03:55 PM
with all the reports from across north america .people are seeing something out in woods.not everyone is making it all up i have read and studyed enough to beleive something is outtheir. |
woodsmaster
|
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 | 04:34 PM
i know of people who have seen bigfoot it is alive and it is only a matter of time before it is proven if jane goodal beleives that is a statement in its self for all you who do not beleive who cares go away or be quite and give it up........ |
Haywire
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 | 02:30 PM
I am a bow hunter up in Northern Ontario. One early morning, while scouting my bear bait, I heard something very large walking in the bush. The footsteps sounded "hollow" on the ground, and very heavy. Much like a large bull moose stomping it's hooves on dry mud. minutes later, I heard a loud shrieking noise, followed by what sounded like an angry mother bear hissing. Purely out of fear, I put my 100 gr broadhead back in my quiver, and pulled out one of my 150 gr. My fear was a Cougar. A cougar could make it up to my treestand in seconds, and if I had to shoot, I had to make sure I ripped one right through it's engine. However, there has only been 1 recorded cougar siting in this area EVER! about 1/4 mile away, something hit my buddy's bear bait, but left no evidence of it being a bear. His tires (bait is placed between 2 old tires to keep wolves from getting to it) laying 50 yards from where they were originally.
Could this have been another hunter trying to scare us away from his hunting area? If there was a cougar in the area chasing down a moose, then why aren't there any moose tracks? (the deer have already pushed the moose out of this area). Why did I find no evidence of a cat in the area? No strong urine smell, footprints,or grouse remains.
Was this "Big Foot"? (note: I didn't find any bigfoot evidence either). |
Chris
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 | 08:58 PM
Why is everyone too scared to entertain the possibility that the world may not be as black and white as it appears. Fill those churches on Sunday, go to work all week and come home and sit in your nice safe house. You're the same people that jumped off the top of roofs when they aired Orsen Well's "War of the Worlds" back in the day. It's okay if you're not the only stud in the barn, isn't it? Open your minds and loosen up that grip on fear. It'll all work out. |
Northern Ontario Resident
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 | 10:50 PM
I have seen bigfoot myself walking on a lake close to the shore i was 10 year old, my mother and i were ice fishing when my father was off trapping. We were waiting for my uncle and aunt to come and join us ice fishing when i was walking a short distance away from my mother. That was then I seen a dark tall person walking around 4 football fields away when i yelled uncle, and kept yelling. It was far enough that i couldnt tell the differnce just a dark image. The thing looked up and stopped then walked into the bush. I thought my uncle was coming around and going to scare us then i told my mother that my uncle was going to scare us throught the bush line on the lake. so we waited then my mother spotted my uncle and aunt walking towards us from the portage. My mother is a ojibway from rat portage and my father a metis from Wabigoon |
Dennis Treeforahead
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 | 10:39 PM
I saw a bigfoot once when I was 12. My Mom, Dad, younger brother and I were deep forest camping. We used to do that once a year for a few days. it was the third and last day of our camp. My dad had left that morning to hunt. My Mom and brother were by the tent and I was poking the fire with a stick. I heard the sound of twigs snapping like someone wlking towards camp. It was thick woods so i couldn't see anyone, thought it was my dad coming back. When i could finally see the huge creature it was already walking straight towards our camp. Its movement was similar to that of a "mosey" and it just walked right through the middle of our site. It glanced at all three of us as it passed and it even looked at my mother and nodded, "Hi. How ya doin'?" and kept walking East.
I remember vividly a strong smell of "Stetson" as it passed by. |
Northern Manitoba Gir
|
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2005 | 08:14 AM
I'm from Northern Manitoba myself (Flin Flon to be exact) and lived in Central Manitoba. Anyone who has been up here will agree that it is very remote here. But I have never seen a 'bigfoot'. Do I believe they are out there? Yes, I do. I relate it to the whole UFO debate, although UFO's are seen directly by people and much more frequently. I agree that nobody has really proven that Sasquatch exists, all we have are blurry vision tape records that really don't define much of anything. But granted that these same tapes are 'something' I think we should keep an open mind about it all and maybe one day there will be some solid evidence or at least a better camera view. But with all the things being discovered these days it is possible!
I just seen the investigative team on this video of Current Affair though; are they kidding?!?!?!?, how serious are they taking this?! Obviously not very much eh? That's just my opinion. Talk about getting a good grasp of the obvious! I wonder myself too why the person who filmed couldn't zoom in any better? Hello, with today's technology I'm sure offers a better visual opportunity to focus. Where they using an old camera or something? Just a thought. That's the only problem I have with the video, why it's so blurry. I think a far clear shot would have been better than a close blurry blotch on the tv screen. This is just my opinions :coolsmirk: |
Psychology Professor
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 | 11:54 PM
I stand with English Teacher!
Why is it that idiots who cannot spell are considered mainstream now, and people who correct them are Nazis?
In a world full of "your" instead of "you're," and "there," "their," and "they're" ambiguity, it's refreshing to see that someone else knows how to spell. (Yes, it's a spelling error, not a grammatical error as someone commented. Typical!)
It doesn't mean we're "better then" you (as some of my students would soberly write), it just means that you're an idiot.
What more could we expect from people who believe in Bigfoot, though? I mean, even my 8-year old nephew could tell you that's all nonsense! |
windtalker
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 | 03:57 PM
Hey professor, i believe the correct term would be "better than".
By the way, I live in the northwest myself. I was raised in the mountains of the northwest oregon coast. My ancestors have been living and working in the mountains for many generations. I asked my grandfather once if he believed in bigfoot, and he told me, "yeah she's standing right there in the kitchen". (guess that explains why I'm so hairy). |
windtalker
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2005 | 04:01 PM
oh yeah, and now they have captured some kind of images of a live giant squid. just fyi.
who cares if bigfoot exists, really? if it does it has never hurt anybody, so why worry about it? |
ennui
|
Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2005 | 09:53 PM
a team of scientists took hundreds of images of a giant squid somewhere off the coast of japan. just fyi |
Ed
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 | 02:35 AM
windtalker, you totally missed the target right here:
Hey professor, i believe the correct term would be "better than".
Seriously, wtf? |
Frank
|
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2006 | 10:40 PM
I often wonder if we are to ever capture a
Sasquatch, alive or dead, what it would taste like. Probably rather gamey tasting but a very tender meat. I think a Bigfoot chili would go over rather swimmingly in the southwest states. |
Paul
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 | 07:58 AM
I am a believer of nessie and bigfoot there is a chance that there is a bigfoot because there was the Moutian Ape that people thought was exticnted and didnt exicet but when a new reporter was making a documentery about the outdoors they spottedso im a believer |
Jessica
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 | 02:04 PM
I just happened to come across this site while doing research and The bigfoot video is SOOOO true, there have been so may sightings up this way in northern manitoba, so many that we can't even count em with 2 handz no more and believe me itz all very, very true. So there. |
saucy minx the saucy's silent
|
Posted: Tue Mar 07, 2006 | 10:02 AM
Like oh my Gosh i totally agree, it was so blurry! Like i mean get a better camera man. Like even the blair witch project had a good camera. Like come on people. |
The dark hunter
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 | 06:05 PM
Lets say for example that I shot a bigfoot while bear hunting, is there anybody who will give money for a bigfoot body?? And who would that person or organization be?? All I can say is that the body is 8feet 6inches and weighs in at 630 pounds and stinks to high HELL. I guess that all of the myths were correct, and all the fat assed professors who said that they didnt exist had better go back to school!! |
|
Page 1 of 2 pages 1 2 > |
