|
Siberia, 1908
|
Posted By:
Winona
in USA
Mar 22, 2005
|
"An expedition of Russian researchers claims to have found evidence that an alien spaceship had something to do with a huge explosion over Siberia in 1908. Experts in asteroids and comets have long said the massive blast was caused by a space rock.
The new ET claim is "a rather stupid hoax," one scientist said today. And it's one with a rich history."
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/tunguska_event_040812.html
((One of the other theories that I've heard about this has to do with the testing that Tesla was doing at the time. The claims are that Tesla had used his Wardenclyfee tower on Long Island to attempt to resonate the Polar Magnetic Field. His Goal was to create a spectacular display in the Aurora Borealis, for Admiral Perry, who was camped near the North Pole. ))
So, spaceship, Tesla, or metiorite, who knows.
|
Comments
The Curator
in San Diego
Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 | 01:39 PM
I've got some info about the Tunguska thing here:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/tunguska/ |
Winona
in USA
Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 | 01:44 PM
Thanks! I thought I'd seen it on here, so I thought the update with more "new" developments on the ET front may be appropriate.
I like the Tesla idea better. 😉 |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 | 07:46 AM
The Tesla theory has been floating around longer than me, I believe. It may be even older than my parents. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 | 07:51 AM
Tesla was something of a quack. Of course, saying that is akin to stating that God doesn't exist so now I'll probably get flamed. |
LaMa
in Europe
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 | 09:11 AM
It was an asteroid. Why resort to fringe speculation on unnatural events if we know that asteroids do impact and create the kind of phenommenon observed at Tunguska? |
Winona
in USA
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 | 02:24 PM
La, I agree that it was most likely an asteroid, I just like the Tesla theory best because it's nutty. 😊 Erik's been trying to convince me to let him build a Tesla coil here, but I won't let him. 😉 |
Accipiter
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 | 03:18 PM
Resonating the Polar Magnetic Field? Okaaaay. . .that's an interesting theory. An explosion like that wouldn't have resulted in that particular blast pattern, though. The blast pattern shape at Tunguska is the type you get from a missile coming in at an angle from the ground and exploding. The magnetic field going kablooie wouldn't do that. |
Mark-N-Isa
in Midwest USA
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 | 04:04 PM
I thought they had already tested soil samples of the area and proved it to be of stellar origin due to compounds being found that weren't of Earth origin? |
Accipiter
Member
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 | 09:27 PM
They found very high levels of iridium and nickel. Both of those are found in the Earth's crust, but not usually in the high levels found at Tunguska, and especially not in little pieces of shrapnel imbedded in the trees. The concentrations of those metals is what you would find in a meteor. Of course, they could be arguing that the aliens made their ship out of meteor material or something like that, which actually would make sense from an engineering standpoint. I still think they're daft, though. |
lurker
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 | 07:57 AM
Best explanation I've found is tectonic in origin. Very convincing arguments made by this gentleman:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Cockpit/3240/
Unfortunately the first link seems to be about 8 million lines long; I couldn't load the whole thing.
But it answers the "no meteor evidence/no comet evidence" thing. |
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
