Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 > |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 09:21 AM
Ask the people that were on it!!!! |
Winona
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 10:21 AM
erm... ok.
What Tv show was that on? |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 11:37 AM
Who cares what TV show it was on? It's been posted on the internet. That's all you need to know. It must be true.:roll:
I do wonder, tho', where the hell Hitler's been hiding that big-ass boat all these years. It's not like you could just throw a tarp over it or something. Maybe he's been using the secret knowledge gained from the Philedelphia Experiment to hide it in plain site. |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 11:43 AM
Well, it's true the Titanic's Sister ship, the Olympia, did go to it's aid but it's highly doubtful they would have swapped the names over and then slaughtered the passengers on the Titanic for an insurance claim.
1. In other words there would have been a discrepancy between the passenger list for the Titanic and the Olympia. If it was the Olympia that really went down then the dead would have been Olympia passengers and not Titanic passengers.
2. The passengers would've been unlikely to board the wrong ship becasue it's usually blazoned in big letters on the hull.
3. This was it's maiden voyage, if they changed the name of the Olympia to the Titanic before the passengers got on, then it was still effectively the Titanic that went down.
4. The Olympia and the Titanic were pretty much identical, what would it matter to them which one sank?
5. The damage done to the companies reputation for an unsinkable ship sinking would probably cost them more than any insurance claim could muster.
6. Would the Captain be willing to die to make the company money? He went down with the ship as did many of the crew!
7. You don't destroy a new ship just because of a small hole, it would've been repaired. Again if it was for the insurance, why bother to swap the names?
8. What about the survivors? If you're going to callously slaughter half a shipload of passengers in some insurance scam, you don't leave others alive that might report the truth of what happened. |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 11:48 AM
Sure, Hitler the young athelic 116 year old man on the deck of the Titanic, crewed by the Angels of Mons. Once a fortnight he pays a quick trip to his favorite bar in Atlantis using the R101 so he doesn't have to pull his pleasure yacht into territorial waters where it might be seen.
Sound reasonable to me. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 11:52 AM
The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Olympic">Olympic</a>. And for completeness, the unfortunate <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic">Britannic</a>. |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 12:31 PM
The Olympic, not Olympia. yep *scuffs foot* |
JoeSixpack
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 12:34 PM
Ya' know, Salami Origami, no hair-brained conspiricy theory is complete with out some UFO tie-in. Get yerself a flyin' saucer or two in there and then you got a STORY! |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 12:54 PM
The Titanic definitely sunk. The Hindenburg, however, never did, nor the Space Shuttle Columbia. Want ice with that? |
Citizen Premier
in spite of public outcry
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 03:49 PM
I thought the Titanic's sister ship was the Lusitania, which also sank. |
Chadds Ford Prefect
Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 04:18 PM
The Titanic never existed; it was just too big to float. Displacement shiplacement. Pfft. |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 05:47 PM
Lusitania? Hmmm... I think you may be thinking of The Spruce Goose, who's sister ship was the Lusigoositania... |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 07:10 PM
The Lusitania was torpedoed |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 | 07:34 PM
No, you have it wrong. It was the St. Lusitania that was Toledoed, but was missed by The Soury. Oh, hio what you're thinking: "Why not give Chesapeake?" Ches would like that, wouldn't he. |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 02:39 AM
Some have said that the Titanic is actually now being used as a private ferry for Hitler!
Then they're idiots. |
Nettie
in Perth, Western Australia
Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 04:10 AM
Maybe Hitler is hiding the titanic in area 51 with the props for the hoax moon landings.
😜 |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 05:14 AM
But...but...but...
What about Atlantis?
I thought Hitler was living on Atlantis with his alien minions.
Obviously, it's emitting enough magnetic radiation that no modern instruments can find it. I KNOW it's true, because Hitler talks to me in my dreams.
😜 |
Roly
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 03:38 PM
I'd suggest you choose another channel. A new brain cudent hoit. |
Citizen Premier
in spite of public outcry
Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 03:42 PM
Hitler lives on Vega! |
JoeSixpack
Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 | 04:18 PM
Elvis lives in Vegas! |
Supertaster
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 | 04:50 AM
The Titanic hoax theory centres around the fact that it's sister ship (the Olympic I think), was involved in a serious collision with a Royal Navy boat on its maiden voyage. A very biased naval panel attributed all blame to the Olympic's captain, therefore the ship's owners were unable to claim insurance for the accident.
The theory goes that the owners swapped the badly-damaged Olympic with the almost-finished Titanic in the shipyard during repairs, then scuttled it at sea and claimed the Titanic's insurance.
While the theory has numerous weaknesses, it doesn't actually deny that a ship went down with over one thousand people still on board.
I think the Olympic (ne Titanic)was used as a troop ship during WWI and had a pretty distinguished history of running into other ships until it was scrapped in the '30s, so it's unlikely Hitler ever set foot on it. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 | 09:32 AM
Iceberg....lettuce ahead. CRUNCH. |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 | 09:55 AM
Oh dear god, Hairy! Now you've corrupted Maegan. I fear for my own safety. |
RetroMan
Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 | 09:56 PM
Let's set this straight- The sinking of the Titanic was a hoax itself, some rich guy bought the whole ship and had it dry docked as a souvenir. I should know, it's sitting in my backyard which wasn't a good idea because now the dog gave it his "blessings".
Now, seriously, anyone ever hear of colour footage of the actual ship? |
Roly
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 | 03:10 PM
Color footage? Back then they were lucky to have black and white! |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 | 03:58 PM
I know for a FACT that it sank. I seen it happen in this MOVIE!!!! The one where that DeCaprio guy was killed in. I think he froze to death or something. But I did see that ship sink!!!! I think it was a few years ago. I guess someone took a video camera on board. Must have been a perve though. He even videotaped them doing something "Naughty" in the back of this rich guys car. Also had them in everyones room as well. |
JoeSixpack
Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 | 04:31 PM
What I can't understand about this crazy theory is that it doesn't explain the very large wreck found on the ocean floor with the name "Titanic" clearly visible through the rust. If that ain't the Titanic, what the hell is it? |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 | 07:13 PM
What the hell is it? What the hell is it? What the hell is it? It's The HMS Repetitious. It's The HMS Repetitious. It's The HMS Repetitious. |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 | 01:16 AM
De Caprio is dead????
I guess that explains his acting! |
Roly
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 | 03:02 PM
Retro man,,,,you say the Titanic was a hoax? Let me guess,,,I bet you believe the holocaust was a hoax too,,right? |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 | 03:51 PM
OOOhhhh, people just like mystery.....Thy don't like the truth. A ship hitting an ice berge and then sinking is too boring doesn't do it for them. |
RetroMan
Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 | 09:56 PM
Nooo Roly, that was sarcasm... wait a minute! How do I know you ain't being sarcastic?!? OOOOGH! |
Roly
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 | 02:47 PM
Sarcasm would be a good word. |
Rod
in the land of smarties.
Member
|
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 | 09:58 PM
Wait, if the Titanic didn't sink, would that mean Celine Dion is a hoax too?
I hope so, she sounds like one. |
Zack
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 | 10:30 PM
it seems every hoax is made into a movie.
Apollo 13
Schindler's List
Titanic
JFK
Passion of the Christ
seriously, I hope that Ashlee Simpson is a hoax. I would hate to believe that someone that awful could be 'successful'. |
Doc
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 | 10:49 PM
Actually folks, the whole Titanic story is a hoax. It is no more true than Orson Welles in 1938 telling the story of the "War of the Worlds" (H.G. Wells - 1898) attack unfolding on his radio show.
The Titanic story was originally called "Futility; The Wreck of the Titan" 1898. (see link)
A similar story unfolded years later with the Apollo program (e.g. Apollo 13)...for the original story see Jules Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon"...1866!
The real question is why do these stories work as they are intended to by the folks who portray them as real in modern times?
What goes in in real life when these stories are being played out might give one who is truly interested a clue or two.
Seek and ye shall find! |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 | 08:00 AM
Been seeking the reefer too much, Doc? |
Snowy
in aeternum
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 | 11:41 AM
oh my...
🐛 |
Roly
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 | 04:00 PM
Good Lord Doc,,,,what did you say???? |
Peter
in Melbourne, Australia
Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 | 10:17 PM
My theory is this
1 The Earth was caught in a gravitational warp that caused it to move sideways
2 The Titanic was caught in an inverse gravitational warp that caused it to stay still
The effect being that the Titanic witnessed the ocean "going up" while the Earth moved and it stayed still
I really do need a girlfriend |
Winona
in USA
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 | 01:02 PM
*IIRC* I do remember hearing about what "Doc" is talking about. Basically it was a novel that came out some years prior to the sinking of the Titanic, that had some amazing cooincidences in the name of the ship (the Titan) and in some of the details of the of the ship such as measurements etc, and of the sinking of it.
While I certainly think it is interesting that this novel came out with the commanalities with what really happened, I do not think the Titanic sinking was a hoax.
BTW, if anyone comes across the book that Doc is referring to, let me know. I have a friend who is looking for a copy of it. 😊 |
Roly
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 | 04:08 PM
You not only need a girl friend, you need a little more (or maybe a little less) booze. |
Peter
in Melbourne, Australia
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 | 11:17 PM
Roly said:
"You not only need a girl friend, you need a little more (or maybe a little less) booze."
Of course Australian beer is superior to anything made overseas. How else would I come up with such a unique theory that is worthy of the Museum of Hoaxes. The Intellectual use of mis-aligned paradigms in the formulation of my gravitational warping theory in regards to the Titanic is only eclipsed in the Australian national drink's prowess in allowing ugly people to have sex.
If you'll excuse me I just need to do some nasty things with a Vegemite sandwich. |
Roly
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 | 01:25 PM
Please don't describe what you are going to do with that sandwich.
For some reason, I know you will feel compelled to do so. |
Hairy Houdini
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 | 01:43 PM
Do you speaka my language? Just smile and defile the Vegemite Sandwich, if you come from The Land Down Under (you better run, better take cover) Yeah, I |
Jonno
|
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 | 08:21 AM
Personally, I believe that both the British and American governments deliberately used a heat seeking Iceberg to penetrate a side of the Titanic, causing it to sink. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 | 09:42 AM
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1419121359/qid=1122824620/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/104-6151146-2533510?v=glance&s=books&n=507846">Futility</a>
Or...The Wreck of the Titan. |
Michelle
|
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 | 06:15 PM
of course the titanic really sank. if not, the truth would have definately come out by now and would have been proven as fact |
Jonno
|
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 | 01:34 PM
And yet we still don't know for certain who killed JFK |
Teh l33t
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 | 05:03 AM
Your an idiot... |
Mariah
|
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 | 03:11 PM
You guys are all idiots! The Titanic sank! They have explored it and the passengers said they were aboard it...the ones that aren't dead and their corpse is at the bottom of the Atlantic...Anyway the dumb butt who told you guys that the titanic didn't sink is a moron. |
Avram Fawcett
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 | 01:49 PM
Hitler is dead you fool. |
Mer-maid
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 | 04:47 AM
hey, james cameron knows for sure that it SANK. his ancestors were on it....and he has all nasty dreams abt it...when they try to explain what happened. |
Jeppers
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 | 04:15 PM
The sister ship of the titanic was swapped with the titanic because of a crash with a navy ship and the insurance would not pay out so they made changes to the sister ship to make it look like the Titanic and it sank they got the insurance and the real titanic saled for years before it was scrapped. the end! |
Happy-Face
|
Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 | 03:59 AM
NOPE. It's really quite simple, the titanic never existed. Nothing is real. We are not really here. You know that computer game you play, maybe you play the sims, perhaps we are those people? Maybe we, in actual fact, are those computer games. We are really being controlled by something greater than ourselves. Someone made me write this, and is making you read it. All these being want to do is use us for amusement. Our death; irrelevant. Our life; non-existant. |
thead
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 | 10:56 AM
THE TITANIC THEORY!!! FROM WHAT I HAVE READ MOST IF NOT ALL OF YOU ARE WRONG!!!!!!!!
the sister ship
it was called HMS Enterprise (yeah I know your probably thinking I |
Captain Al
in Vancouver Island, Canada
Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 | 10:11 AM
thead,
How could the British government collect insurance on a ship that was owned by a private company? |
Jeppers
|
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 | 10:15 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_alternate_theories |
Robert Cumberland
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 | 08:42 PM
I have a picture of the Olympic taken during world war one and it is indeed Olympic if you look at a picture of the Olympic and Titanic you can tell the difference between them by looking at the forward promenade deck on the Olympic it is wide open on the Titanic it is enclosed to shield passenger's from spray from the bow. Therefore Titanic sank and Olympic was scrapped in the thirtie's.
If you don't agree Look at picture's of the two ships |
crazy-angel
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 | 10:27 PM
thead: the ship was meant to sink on the return journey
Hahaha ... If only skeleton crew was meant to be there, how come so many ppl were onboard! were they on adventure ride 😉 |
Page 1 of 3 pages 1 2 3 > |