|
British JFK Game
|
Posted By:
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Nov 22, 2004
|
http://www.indystar.com/articles/3/196679-8823-010.html
Everyone remembers where they were when JFK was shot. But who can say, they shot JFK? This new game released allows you to shoot the former President!
I thought this was interesting since we just had a discussion about a WTC game. How does this rank on the "un-american" scale, since it was created in the UK?
Comments anyone?
|
Comments
The Curator
in San Diego
Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 | 11:16 AM
According to Rochelle Sparrow, JFK is alive. She speaks with him regularly:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041122/phm018_1.html |
Paul
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 | 03:27 PM
Maegan,
Forget un-american, try disgusting.
I love race, fly and puzzle games. Any game that shoots anything should be banned. That's nothing to teach your children.
It's just a game? MY ASS.
|
Maegan
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2004 | 08:02 AM
Exactly my thoughts, Paul. A radio host asked the question, what if the American's created a game called, "Driving Di"? How would THEY feel? I think this 'eduacational' spin they're trying to throw in is simply disgusting. |
Flightrisk
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 | 07:31 AM
"I love race, fly and puzzle games. Any game that shoots anything should be banned. That's nothing to teach your children."
That is one of the most ridiculous things i have read on these boards. Any game that shoots anything should be banned? Should alkl films that depicted violence be banned too Paul? How bout songs? Paintings? And why stop at just violence, lets ban any depiction of any of lifes uglier traits. That way they're sure to go away!
You know video games have age limits on them right? A game in which you have to shoot JFK will definately get the 18 cert(i'm not saying that that excuses the idiotic content of the game but at least this way it won't be "teaching" kids anything) And the majority of shooting games will carry a cert between 15-18. It's this kind of knee jerk "let's ban everything" mentality that causes problems in later years, not the video games. |
matzusdog
in work
Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 | 12:35 PM
Hehehe. Driving Di. you crazy yanks.
How can one nation take itself so seriously? and compare the late great JFK with some moon face inbred who had an affair and was in a car crash? You guys forget sometimes us english took all of our intolerant, stuck up, no-fun religious fanatics (who banned Christmas because it isn't in the bible)and shipped them over there, and now we have to put up with this kind of crap back as intelligent discussion!
Paul said: "I love race, fly and puzzle games. Any game that shoots anything should be banned. That's nothing to teach your children."
But lets not take away the 'god given' right of all americans to own bloody great hand cannons... |
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 | 03:12 AM
Oh, matzusdog.
I think I love you. |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 | 12:44 PM
Lately, I have been playing Playboy, The Mansion, on X Box. I have yet to start publishing a nudey mag though. Funny, I love violent video games too, but I still can't bring myself to start shooting people or running them over. |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 | 03:37 PM
I will be 29 this month |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 07:18 AM
Sorry, but I don't give out that info online. |
Flightrisk
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 10:53 AM
I have 0 violent kids Paul. Thanks for asking. |
Sharruma
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 11:51 AM
It seems to be a common misconception that violence in games or on TV will beget violence in RL
Oh, there might be a few of low intelligence who think that something they see in fiction might be cool to try - there are always exceptions.
But most of those who indulge in these fantasies know they are fantasies and what's more this is and escape for their adrenadlin and their desire to do violence.
Video game violence and movie violence are outlets and far from increasing the instances of RL violence are more likely to decrease it.
'I can murder to my hearts content, at home, safe, in front of my computer monitor and it's not against the law.'
The world of one hundred years ago was a lot more violent than the world of today. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 11:53 AM
I was just trying to show a correlation. JFK was like American 'royalty'. What's the deal with really old threads being pulled back up again?? |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 12:28 PM
hmmmmm....ok, I thought about it. Nope, won't do it.
By the way, children have allways been this violent, it is human nature. Some are just more prone to it. It just gets more media attention now days, and we are hearing about it more and more because of this. We are allways exposed to violence, news, real life, music, video games. Even books. Just because a kid might say that they got the idea to commit a certain crime because of a game or what ever, it had to be in him to commit such an act to begin with. If it wasn't the game, it would have been something else. Billions of people have killed and have been killed because of religious ideas throughout history, are we going to ban religion???? Nope. |
JoeSixpack
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:08 PM
Stephen, I'm sure you're a smart guy, but you're SO wrong on this issue.
"By the way, children have allways been this violent, it is human nature."
Most of the evidence shows just the opposite. Study after study shows a causal link between voilent behavior and childhood viewing patterns. Here's some links for you:
http://www.apa.org/pubinfo/violence.html
http://www.aap.org/family/tv1.htm
http://www.childrennow.org/media/medianow/mnwinter1998.html
http://www.babybag.com/articles/amaviol.htm
There are, literaly, hundreds of studies that show the same thing. Of course, you never hear it on the local Fox affiliate.
I'm sure you don't have kids, because when you do, you'll spend more time thinking about how to raise them than rebutting guys like Paul and me. I have a kid, and I don't let him watch more than two hours of TV a WEEK, and I damn sure don't let him watch anything violent. |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:29 PM
I'll give in; I have a 9 yr. old.
plays games, watches movies; she seems fine. And being a good parent, I encourage her to use her imagination. She has free will when it comes to games and TV, and suprisingly, she doesn't watch that much, and only picks up her game boy once in a while. She just wants her show on while she plays. Also, these studies are still somewhat new, compared only recently since all this wonderful technology has come about in the few last decades. You can't compare these findings to what has been going on for centuries. This is only my opinion, we all have one. I look at it this way, you got some good kids and some bad, it will allways be like that no matter what you put in there face. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:34 PM
Sorry, I don't remember the last time I turned on the news & heard that some kid was burning Atlanta (sort of like when Sherman came through during the Civil War - the account is referenced in multiple books). Kids aren't reading books & getting creepy ideas. Kids are getting ideas put into their heads by their environment. Some kids make a judgement call and say, "Hmm...live grenade into the mini-van? Probably not a good idea!" Other kids aren't so savvy.
There is more media attention now, b/c access is being broken down. Cameras are lighter weight & can be trucked around...home video has proven numerous times that someone IS watching what is going on.
My city just started using Tasers. At least once a week the news has a story about a student being tasered. Why? Student was endangering themselves & others with their actions. Years ago...kids were <i>afraid</i> to do something that was 'wrong', they didn't want to get paddled or deal with the consequences. Now it's more like, how much can I get away with before they make me go to counseling? |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:37 PM
I would like to mention though, that while I have never bit or screamed at my daughter...she does try to bite me & will shreik if the object of her desire is taken from her. (I took so long to post that 4 more posts got up b/f I realized it.)
So...kids aren't born angels...but I have also learned what discipline works on a 13 month old baby, so that she curbs that biting and screaming habit. |
X
in McKinney, TX
Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 | 01:44 PM
LOL; thanks for the ice breaker Maegan.... |
Molika
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2005 | 04:02 PM
i think so mh |
Chris
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 | 01:27 PM
Look guys if someone wants to play violent video games then f#$#^% let em it not up to u if i play Counter-Strike of foo foo bunny land(if that is a game this was just a councidence) but still i only play violent video games but i dont want to kill any one i use em to vent my frustration so insted of killing someone i kill zombies. Look there is no way violent video games could be banned b/c there too many games that have violence in fact only little kid or educational games dont have violence. There is no escaping it everything nowdays is violent i mean hell there is a war going on right as i am typin this so leave us gamers alone |
chris
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 | 01:29 PM
Look i ment Counter-strike insted of foo foo bunny land |
CHRIS
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 | 01:38 PM
look im 15 i play video games almost every day but im not violent but no matter what im just a kid but i still got an oppionion look if ur gonna try to ban video games then why not violence in movies, Tv, and in the world all together whell heres why u CANT video games are violent and still will be if u dont want ur kids to see that kind of crap then dont let them but like i said before LEAVE THE GAMES AND GAMERS ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Boo
in The Land of the Haggii...
Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 | 01:44 PM
We hear you, chris!
Jeeeez.
And I think you'll find that not all of us want violent video games banned. |
chris
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2005 | 06:01 PM
ok i was just sayin because i get soo uggh when anyone starts talkin bout banning vids b/c that is one of my fav things 2 do |
Charybdis
in Hell
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 | 08:34 AM
That may be true but throwing tantrums at people who have nothing to do with it only make you look like a little child and, at best, people will ignore you. At worst they will take the opportunity or antagonize you further because it's fun. |
David B.
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 | 09:28 AM
At worst they will take the opportunity or antagonize you further because it's fun.
You had to go and spoil it didn't you. I had a month's worth of baiting planned and off you go and 'tip him the wink'!
I was going to rile him for a week with how his button bashing had rendered it impossible for him to use a keyboard properly.
I was all set to imply his inability to string a cogent argument (or recognizable sentence) together were due to video games eroding his attention level.
I had a ton of vitriol scripted around how, 'when he reached puberty', he'd wind up as one more hoody-wearing thug making our malls look untidy.
Gone. Wasted. All useless now.
Oh well! I guess I'll just play another level of Metroid Prime then go mug a pensioner or two.
Frag the weak! Hurdle the dead! |
Mort
in Just left of centre
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 | 09:34 AM
Where's the fun in hurdling the dead? It's like walking on very squishy carpet. |
Owen
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 | 12:29 PM
There's one thing people need to remember; IT'S NOT REAL. Both the people who criticise and the people who play the games/watch the films/[insert activity here]. Any idiot who goes out and shoots someone in real life so they can recreate their favourite bit of Quake is probably stupid enough to get themselves into trouble anyway, computer games or not.
(btw, well said Matzusdog. Boo, can we share him?) |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 | 12:41 PM
Oh my goodness. Can threads just stay buried?? |
Leon
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 | 02:03 PM
Paul is just one of those people who thinks that banning something solves a problem. Just because Halo involves shooting opponets, it doesn't mean that players will go out and shoot coworkers or classmates. God for bid, we see a violent video game. The things that are making youth turn violent are the parents and places they live in. Stop blamming it on a defenseless black box under your TV. And take away the guns before you take away the games. |
Flu-Bird
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 | 08:59 AM
Have the kennedys gotten word of this have any liberals gotten word of this or are they too busy being rediculous to bother |
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
