|
Starchild Project
|
Posted By:
Art D
Oct 09, 2004
|
The Starchild Project now claims to have had a DNA analysis performed on a fragment of bone from the starchild's skull, but all they have been able to 'prove' so far is that the mother was an amerindian. They expect to have a nuclear DNA test performed soon to determine the father. Any comments?
|
Comments
|
Page 2 of 2 pages < 1 2 |
Ash Doonan
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 | 06:53 AM
Phevan,
Pseudoscience is the process of thinking in a creationist/alternative sort of way (please correct me if I'm wrong because that's the first time I've heard of such a phrase haha),
Anyhow you are right if my statement above is correct,
We must think in a critical way that's different from science,
Though we can combine both the thinking processes together,
Actually can you clarify your thoughts, Phevan, because they sound very intriguing (:
This is stupid in hilo:
You have made my day with a much needed smile hahah I'm not quite sure if you believe in a cat-human hybrid and really is it possible? :S |
Michael
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 | 11:12 AM
You are supposedly from Australia, so you speak English, right? Your lack of proper grammar and spelling shows to me that you are uneducated, but I will school you on a few things.
He did not prove anything alien with the Starchild skull. All he has is a deformed skull from a child who had a human mother. The FACT is that the DNA extracted was HUMAN. They were unable to perform a test to determine the paternal DNA, so there is NO EVIDENCE that the skull is born of an alien.
I have read the idiotic website. I have read the DNA testing results from the actual DOCTOR who performed them. The only DNA they extracted was HUMAN!!! There is NO PROOF that there was any alien involved.
He is NOT a qualified anthropologist or scientist, or ANYTHING. He is an author, and is skilled in the choice of words to fool poor people like you into believing his jibberish!
I actually feel sorry for you. But I guess uneducated people are easy to fool.
Until you can post evidence that the skull has DNA that has never been seen before on Earth, or anything else to that effect, then you are just wasting your breath. You, just like Lloyd, have NO PROOF, and are going on stictly BELIEF. I mean after all, Lloyd follows the words of someone even crazier than him, who believes in Sumeran mythology and that aliens came to Earth in rocket ships and genetically engineered humans as slaves...
Crazy people like this should be locked away, for a long time... |
Ash Doonan
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 | 11:44 PM
Micheal in Iraq (tosser!):
I will now ground you on a few things my friend because your apparent ego and arrogance have clouded your empty mind;
1. How can you speak of me at a personal level when all you know is my name and that I'm from Australia. On the means of grammer well you can not determine how intelligent one is or their skill in logic and so on through just grammer (that logic is beyond truth). Its evident that your clouded mind has blinded you with arrogance and stupidity. My friend you had better use your words more lightly!
Also my background could be one of a well respected doctor for all you know. How dare you target me in such a way!
2. The Starchild, in which you have GREATLY misinformed, is one that is clear from known and yes, I repeat KNOWN (get in your head please) deformities. Period.
If deformity was to be present well put two and two together then you get a UNKNOWN deformity. This in means of science is very great indeed.
Though evidence like the weight plus endurance of the bone, the strange fibres that defy all known human bone structures and the reddish residue that has startled many scientists and experts in the field because of its strange composition, are providing a picture that there was a non-human living amoung us about a thousand years ago.
3. The skull IS NOT a whole human, only its mother was a human. Now this is the part where your mind has been tangled up very badly. Pye and his team had extracted and found the mtDNA which is the mother BUT they did not manage to extract the nuclear DNA which is the combination of the mother and father DNA. If they had such then the father would be found. Thus they hav'nt proven it to be human but an unknown being who had a almost, if not, alien father
4. You do not know Lloyd Pye at all. He is very experienced and has many more brain cells than yourself (THAT I KNOW). According to Pye's biography of himself on his website, he has been a university student who had studied psychology and then moved on to be a agent for the military. He must have done something right in his life!
Also he has connections to the scientific community and has 30 years of experience in science. That I doubt you have.
5. You have not looked at my link for the Starchild Project at all! I am so angry that such a person would be so idiotic to attack me and have no knowledge on the subject. Your brain has to absorb much more than it is taking in my friend. The DNA presented on his site is not from this world. Ok now explain to me those strange features of the skull and why the nuclear DNA wasn't recovered. PLEASE enlighten me because in the end all I would be doing is laughing at your pointness pursuit! |
Michael
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 | 10:29 AM
I'm sure you're a doctor.
Actually, I know you are not. Congratulations on lying on the internet, I bet you feel really special.
The only DNA pulled from the skull was HUMAN, there was no alien or even any other unknown or unrecognized DNA pulled from the skull. This does not automatically make the skull an alien-human hybrid. You are a complete moron if you do not understand this simple fact. Is it possible? I guess, but until we see the paternal DNA as something never before seen, then you cannot say it is an alien. Right now, it is UNKNOWN. I could post the actual DNA test results, but I'd be wasting my time as you wouldn't be able to understand what was being said.
He has 30 years of wasted time studying bogus claims and writing about it. He is NOT A SCIENTIST. He does not have any formal training in the sciences. You follow his website like it is the only word. I have news for you, any idiot can post things on the internet and claim them to be real (with no proof) like he does. I can make a website called "chickenspoopgold.com" and claim that chicken poo is gold and sells for tons of money. Does that make it true? Of course not. He still has no evidence to back his claim that alien intervention is the cause of humans as we know them today. Is it possible? Anything is possible, but scientific evidence (from real scientists) proves much more AGAINST his claims.
Like I said, in the end, all he has is a deformed child's skull, and no evidence. Where is the alien DNA? He doesn't have any. All he has is HUMAN DNA, and he was unable to recover the second part of that. You are unable to prove there is alien DNA. You are a horrible failure.
I still think crazy people should be locked away. Maybe we should put them all on the moon, maybe aliens will meet you lunatics there. |
Ash Doonan
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 | 06:49 PM
Tosser:
Please send me all the links in which goes against Lloyd Pye himself,
I would love to see them,
You say there are lots of scientists who go against his word well please send me a few links,
At the moment you seem to come up with information that seems to me to be incorrect.
I want to look at scientific information and not hear it from a complete arrogant idiot like yourself,
I can not get anywhere with you because you just dismiss everything I say.
I suppose there must be people like you on this Earth who make progress very slow with your bogus claims.
Also you do not know me at all!
How can you say I'm not a doctor!
Well at least I know abit about you and you seem to be a stuck-up bastard who loves to get on the wrong side of people, go back into your slums and stay there, you sleevey tosser! |
Smerk
in to mischief
Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 | 08:36 PM
There is no need to get uncivilised, people. If you can't discuss this matter without calling each other various names, the thread will be closed. |
Ash Doonan
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 | 02:58 AM
Lloyd Pie,
Very funny my friend. I bet a few people on this forum would go, "Woah, I knew it! Mr. Pye (Pie) was lying!" Good show I say hahah great. Well anyway my view still stands strong in my mind and that is Lloyd Pye is no liar and has something something very special indeed. |
|
Page 2 of 2 pages < 1 2 |
|
Note: This thread is located in the Old Forum of the Museum of Hoaxes.
|
