kev
|
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2004 | 04:15 PM
As I already pointed out:
The latest ish of "Skeptical Inquirer" (Jul/Aug 04) is a good one. It features:
- "PBS 'Secrets of the Dead' Buries Truth about Turin Shroud": Joe Nickell takes PBS to task for their lame Shroud doc, and presents tons of evidence for its fakery...
|
Myst
Member
|
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 | 12:06 PM
Latest news article from Reuters claims the shroud is not a medieval fake. The claim is the area tested was a patch, possibly placed on the shroud after it was damaged in a fire in 1532.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=570&e=2&u=/nm/religion_shroud_dc |
Mark-N-Isa
in Midwest USA
Member
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 | 06:34 PM
http://www.livescience.com/history/050318_reason_turin_shroud.html |
Just a random guy
in in a hospital, out of a long coma
Member
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 | 08:01 AM
You know, a lot of people say completely opposite things about the Shrout of Turin. One thing that I read said that the stains on the shroud were tested and found 100% positive to be blood, while another said that it was tested and found to be nothing but paint on the shroud 😕 |
Hyped on Caffiene
in Michigan down by the river
Member
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 | 11:25 AM
or jesus just forgot to wipe. |
Citizen Premier
in spite of public outcry
Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 | 01:26 AM
I fail to understand why this shroud would even be considered important to Christians. If Jesus is Infinitely Great, wouldn't His Radiance have blessed all points on the globe equally? The fact that an object was closer to him wouldn't make it any more holy, I would think. |
Maegan
in Tampa, FL - USA
Member
|
Posted: Tue Aug 02, 2005 | 05:06 AM
And I agree with you, Citizen.
<b>Also, I am closing this thread, b/c there is another Turin Shroud thread. I'm simply closing the one that has less comments.</b> |
