Fake Puma Ad Mystery Solved
Status: Update about advertising hoax
Remember this racy PUMA ad? It was circulating around the internet back in early 2003. The rumor was that it had appeared in the Brazilian version of Maxim, but PUMA officials soon denied this, and further stated that their company was not responsible for it in any way. PUMA then threatened to sue anyone who posted it. (No one ever got sued.) This led many bloggers to speculate that PUMA was, in fact, the creator of it, and had spread it as a subviral advertisement (i.e. a viral ad secretly produced by a company, which the company denies any knowledge of... allowing them to experiment with more controversial forms of marketing). But despite this speculation, the question of who created the image remained unresolved, until now. Peter Kim, former PUMA International Marketing Manager, has disclosed the inside story on his blog:What really happened - a small Eastern European agency affiliated with Saatchi & Saatchi created the ads on spec, trying to win business with a PUMA subsidiary. They got nothing and emailed the ads to friends; from that point it snowballed. As you can guess, when the PUMA powers-that-be decided to get all corporate on the blogosphere, the whole thing exploded. Poor Pete M.'s (PUMA GC in the US) email inbox exploded with junk after that, with his name being on the cease and desist. No "Brazilian Maxim", no evil master plan (they're real but we'll say they're fake), but online store sales were up like CRAZY for a couple of weeks. Too bad we didn't even have the shoes in the ads in stock!
This is bad news for me, because I describe the fake PUMA ad in Hippo Eats Dwarf, but I leave the story about it open ended, stating that no one knows (or is admitting) who created it. Unfortunately it's too late to revise what I wrote because the book is already rolling off the presses. I guess that's the danger of writing about recent events. You risk getting outdated. (via Adrants)
|
Categories: Advertising Posted by Alex on Tue Jan 31, 2006 |
Comments (11) |
| More from the Hoax Museum Archives: | |||
Just a thought Alex, you could put a little supplementary chapter on the website to update all the stories that have been concluded since the book went to the presses.
Posted by Andrew Nixon on Wed Feb 01, 2006 at 01:32 AM
I don't see why you accept Kim's story without question. It's interesting that Saatchi & Saatchi is in a position to deny responsibility too.
By the way, what is on the girl's thigh? 😉
Posted by elguapo on Wed Feb 01, 2006 at 05:11 AM
By the way, what is on the girl's thigh? 😉
Apparently in the UK there are a series of anti-litter ads with a very similar picture. The tag line in "While you're down there...". (From Lynne Truss' book 'Talk to the Hand'.)
If this idea isn't too controversial for a (government?) anti-litter campaign, I don't see why a shoe company wouldn't use it!
Posted by Fawkes on Wed Feb 01, 2006 at 08:17 AM
If this idea isn't too controversial for a (government?) anti-litter campaign, I don't see why a shoe company wouldn't use it!
Good idea, Andrew. I think I'll do that.
Posted by The Curator in San Diego on Wed Feb 01, 2006 at 09:34 AM
Course, the real mystery is who the girl is?
😛
Posted by nekkidben on Thu Aug 24, 2006 at 02:52 AM
😛
It's not fake. I have seen this advert in a very popular gloss magazine in Croatia. It's a kind of FHM type magazine for young male audience (you know... sexy chicks, cheeky and dirty humour, gadgets, cars, music, games, movies etc.)
Posted by srdjan on Thu Aug 24, 2006 at 03:02 AM
If you'll recall there were two of these images circulating on the web at the time. Srdjan, if you have photos of the magazine with the advert in it those would be worth posting online, though the spec ads could have made their way into print through shady means.
Posted by Cap'n Drew on Thu Aug 24, 2006 at 05:31 AM
I heard you interviewed on the "Cultureshocks" radio show months ago. Do you have a new edition coming out?
Posted by Halfreed on Thu Aug 24, 2006 at 06:49 AM
I've spoken to a friend that works in advertising, she says that it never was published.
I'm pretty damn sure I've seen it. A friend of mine has a whole collection of this mag. Next time I'm round his place I'll go through his collection and try to find it.
Although now I started thinking I may have to retract my previous claim 😊
But let me check first....
Posted by srdjan on Fri Aug 25, 2006 at 02:16 AM
I'm pretty damn sure I've seen it. A friend of mine has a whole collection of this mag. Next time I'm round his place I'll go through his collection and try to find it.
Although now I started thinking I may have to retract my previous claim 😊
But let me check first....
this is stupid
Posted by me on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 11:33 AM
Does it not surprise anyone that most people accepted this as a real advert. Does this not suggest that we are becomming desensitised by advertising, or is it that we are expecting advertisers to carry on trying to shock us in new and unexpected ways?
Posted by Bennett_jck on Thu Jan 22, 2009 at 08:07 AM
{stupid336x280}
Get MOH Blog Posts by Email
Our Sister Sites
