Incompetent art forgers try to sell “Warhol” portrait of non-existent Baldwin brother
It's too bad the Tribune story doesn't give the buyer's name and address. I have a 2002 Rembrandt I know he'd be interested in.Posted by Big Gary in Wimberly, Texas on Thu Nov 19, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Actually, I could have fallen for the extra brother but you are right, what gave it away for me was the fact that the painting was from 1996....Anyway maybe this story could be false, notice no names are given for any of the people involved.Posted by mario in new joysey on Thu Nov 19, 2009 at 10:23 PM
In my mind, we are ALL Baldwin brothers.Posted by Cranky Media Guy on Sun Nov 22, 2009 at 04:37 AM
let's face it, there are that many Baldwin brothers it's pretty hard to keep track. That's why their mother's euphemistically named cancer charity made such growth in such a short time . . . they all chipped in $5 and it reached $10 million from them alone.Posted by D F Stuckey in Auckland New Zealand on Fri Nov 27, 2009 at 10:30 PM
Famous Baldwin family? Isn't that like saying talented Arquette family?Posted by Dave on Sat Jan 16, 2010 at 06:31 PM
True, Dave. Almost like saying happy and healthy Kennedy family . . . :DPosted by D F Stuckey in Auckland New Zealand on Sat Jan 16, 2010 at 07:07 PM
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.