Holy Grail Found in Da Vinci’s Last Supper

Status: True (in my opinion)
Here's a bit of a mystery. I received an email from someone called Prastil who wrote, "Check this hoax out: DaVinciGrail.com." The site he directed me to claims that the holy grail has finally been discovered in Da Vinci's painting of the Last Supper. For centuries people have wondered why Da Vinci omitted the grail from his painting, given that the grail is one of the central elements of the Last Supper story. Its absence has spawned a variety of theories, such as the one elaborated in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code, that the holy grail was Mary Magdalene's uterus (and that the figure to the left of Jesus in the painting is Mary Magdalene). But DaVinciGrail.com claims that Da Vinci actually did include the grail in his painting, if you look hard enough. He concealed it as a symbol on the wall above the head of St. Bartholomew, the disciple at the extreme left. (I highlighted the cup in the image below).

It may seem a bit farfetched that after centuries someone discovered a detail in the Last Supper that no one had ever seen before, but as far as I can tell, that's the case. The man who noticed the grail in the painting was Gary Phillips, a Michigan computer programmer (and cryptologist). He was aided in his discovery by the fact that the painting was recently cleaned, revealing details previously concealed by dirt and grime. Of course, Phillips could be seeing a shape that was not intentionally placed there by Da Vinci, but once you see the cup, it seems so obvious that it's hard to believe it wasn't placed there on purpose. The legitimacy of Phillips's claim to have discovered this hidden detail is noted on a number of sites, such as About.com's Art History blog.

Now here's where things get strange. Phillips has nothing to do with DaVinciGrail.com. Instead, Phillips maintains a separate site called Realm of Twelve. DaVinciGrail.com is registered to (drumroll, please) Prastil, the same guy who emailed me telling me that the site was a hoax. Why did Prastil claim his site was a hoax? Was he trying to get me to write about his site, not thinking that I would check the domain registration? I have no idea (and I wrote about it anyway). But Phillips's discovery of the grail hidden as a symbol on the wall in The Last Supper seems real enough to me... unless there's some part of the story that I'm not clued in to. (Very possible.)
image

Art

Posted on Tue Sep 27, 2005



Comments

Have a look at the original painting (search Google images). It's clearly a fake.
Posted by Ciaran  on  Tue Sep 27, 2005  at  10:38 PM
I did do a google image search. But you've got to make sure that a) you're looking at the restored version of the last supper (you can't see it in the unrestored version); and b) you're looking at da vinci's last supper, and not one of the many copies of it. The cup is there.
Posted by The Curator  in  San Diego  on  Tue Sep 27, 2005  at  11:19 PM
Maybe the restorers put it in as a joke? It's very subtle, and definitely not visible on the unrestored version (although the unrestored version is so badly deteriorated you can't make out a lot of the finer details).
Posted by Smerk  on  Tue Sep 27, 2005  at  11:40 PM
I thought it was a fake at first too, so I tried to find some other, more trustworthy images to check against. The image is certainly there in the restored. However, if you go to the enlarged image available at it loses its definition as a chalice. Perhaps this is an intended illusion by da Vinci or perhaps it isn't a chalice at all.
Posted by Dean  on  Tue Sep 27, 2005  at  11:42 PM
So THAT'S where Jesus left his beer stein!
Posted by 8  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  05:01 AM
...I always thought people looked into these things too much. Maybe in all of DaVinci's "genius", he just liked to paint, and forgot about that specific detail. Why would it be such a big deal that one of the details revealed in scripture is missing from the picture? DaVinci was not a priest or a theologian, I doubt he would have just forgotten that the cup existed, but maybe it wasn't what he wanted people to focus on.
Posted by Maegan  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  05:15 AM
In the same vain, I have found at least two other Holy Grails in the Last Supper the last hour. One befittingly is in the hands of Jesus, the other in those of Judas:




and:


Posted by LaMa  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  05:48 AM
Oops: that last one should've been:

Posted by LaMa  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  05:49 AM
Here is the original.....and it CAN be seen....
Posted by X  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  07:05 AM
There are plenty of little cups on the table. Why couldn't one of those be the grail?
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  07:24 AM
Accipiter makes a good point. Also, that thing on the wall is not supposed to be the grail. If DaVinci wanted people to see the grail there, it would be subtle and beautiful. What we see there now is clumsily grail-shaped, sort of.
Posted by Matt  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  07:35 AM
maybe it was in the kitchen getting washed at this point during the supper. or maybe it fell on the floor...
or maybe it was getting washed because it fell on the floor.
Posted by thephrog  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  08:48 AM
The restored painting does not show a grail. Only half of the supposed grail is there, the right side is missing. Even if the design showed bilateral symmetry it would still be a reach to claim it's a grail symbol.

I agree with Accipiter. The grail was simply the vessel that Christ used at the last supper. There's no reason to believe that it would be anything other than an ordinary cup. Didn't anyone see Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?

I don't think it's a hoax so much as wishful thinking.
Posted by Charybdis  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  09:10 AM
I'm still inclined to think that Da Vinci intended to put a grail there, because artists like him never do anything by accident. Plus, it's not something subtle. It's really obvious, once it's pointed out.
Posted by The Curator  in  San Diego  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  09:22 AM
If I am not mistaken, the painting depicts the point of the Last Supper where Jesus tells everyone that one of them will betray him the next day, hence most of the disciples look agahast and why Judas is the only one leaning away from Jesus, etc. etc. This point of the Last Supper was before the breaking of the flesh-bread and shedding of the blood-wine for eucharist. It could be that Jesus just hasn't had the grail brought to him yet.
Posted by Dean  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  12:55 PM
Don't you people know? Mary Magdalene is the real Holy Grail, as Leonardo da Vinci was hired by the Priory of Sion AND the Illuminati along with other famous genius' to make these kind of clues to distract people so they could plot together to create a new world order!
Posted by Yaanu  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  07:22 PM
Was that sarcasm, Yaanu? 'Cause I really hope it was...

🐛

😊
Posted by Snowy  on  Wed Sep 28, 2005  at  07:43 PM
Somehow this reminds me of Percival Lowell's canals on Mars: The human brain tends to make patterns where no pattern objectively exist; we're just hardwired that way.
Posted by eovti  on  Thu Sep 29, 2005  at  03:54 AM
...or discovering the face of the Holy Virgin on a sandwich, or seeing Satan in the smoke billowing from the WTC.
Posted by eovti  on  Thu Sep 29, 2005  at  04:00 AM
I did a google search, and found this photo where you can zoom in really close (If you had the whole picture at this resolution, it would be over 5 screens wide and 4 screens tall!). It gives this resolution by adding detail as you zoom it, like Google Maps.

http://milano.arounder.com/category/fullscreen/IT000005356.html

It turns out to be a vaguely-grail-shaped piece of detail on the pillar (or whatever it is) behind him.
Posted by Simon Richard Clarkstone  on  Sat Oct 01, 2005  at  11:31 AM
Referring to Yaanu's opinion,I clearly say that she is right.If some of you who has read The Da Vinci Code, you probably already know that the real Holy Grail is none other than Mary Magdalene herself.
Posted by Anonymus  on  Tue Oct 04, 2005  at  03:06 AM
As an art historian (with a bit of paper to prove it) I must point out that this latest 'restoration' is only the most recent in a series of attempts to reverse the severe deterioration that started in this image almost the day Leonardo put down his palette. Any vague shadowy thing you can see in it could be the result of any of the natural or human processes it's undergone over the last few hundred years. - There's a widespread tendency to see Leonardo as almost a wizard (it's his Dumbledore beard that does it), which gets in the way of appreciating his art, in my opinion.
Posted by Mr Henderson  on  Tue Oct 04, 2005  at  02:56 PM
To the best of my knowledge, I am the guy that discovered the supposed grail in the painting.

When you look at pre-restoration versions, these are *not* depicted as the artist originally intended. Through the centuries, the paintings were 'repaired' and sometimes intentionally altered for various reasons.

The post-restoration version of The Last Supper is, in my opinion, much closer to the original than before.

For some of Leonardo's comments regarding his art, please visit the Holy Grail (Sangreal) page on my web site http://www.realmoftwelve.net.

(and thank you, webmaster, for the link)

gary
Posted by Gary Phillips  on  Thu Oct 06, 2005  at  04:40 PM
I See GOD IN THE PICTURE!!! Can u??
Posted by Jeri  on  Sat Oct 08, 2005  at  07:28 PM
where do you see god??
Posted by Ian  on  Sat Nov 12, 2005  at  05:11 PM
On the zoom in link you can also quite clearly make out a shadowy grail/chalice/vessel shaped thingy-majig on the right just under the painting, lets face it if you want to see it it's there, I can see faces on the stone tiles in my bathroom, message from God? maybe not. As for the people who base their philosophy on Indiana Jones thats got me rollin.
Posted by David Antcliff  on  Mon Jan 23, 2006  at  05:15 AM
Why the holy isnt a human being ?? why its just a normal cup ?? could the grail be the woman who sat right jesus ?? please help me with your opinions!
Posted by Khalid Hammour  on  Sun Jan 29, 2006  at  06:35 AM
Hi .. just asking why the grail isnt a humanbeing ?? i meant teh person(female who sat right jesus), the positipn she took may be a strong evidence that she could be his secret holder.
Posted by Khalid Hammour  on  Sun Jan 29, 2006  at  06:44 AM
how about this one. up above jesus to the right there is what appears to be a white square with two black spots on it . guess what folks, it is identical to the picture of the doorway located in the queens chamber that rudolph gatenbrink discovered with the robot in 1993 i believe. and just so happens it is above mary magdaline and if you look at it it is the shaft that leads to it. if anyone is interested i have discovered many other things in the painting i have been telling people for 7 years way before the davinci code came out .i would be happy to share some truly mind boggling things that are right in front of our face that are unexplainable . the man was able to see in the future. feel free to e mail me and be ready to be shocked, just a quick note about the grail the word if you arrange the letters different says agirl eleven men sat at the table. if you remove the v from eleven which would symbolise the woman it now reads table of elements. now the alter is the rememberance of the table and the latin word for alter is mensa. which i also believe is a club of some smart people. gotta go im painting a picture of a brain and i needed a break . thanks for listening. catherine
Posted by catherine higgs  on  Tue Mar 28, 2006  at  11:04 PM
"just a quick note about the grail the word if you arrange the letters different says agirl eleven men sat at the table. if you remove the v from eleven which would symbolise the woman it now reads table of elements. now the alter is the rememberance of the table and the latin word for alter is mensa. which i also believe is a club of some smart people."

*cries as his brain implodes*
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed Mar 29, 2006  at  12:45 AM
Thanks to the zoom in pic, one can clearly see that it is not a grail especially on the right side. Besides unless Jesus was gay, you know he did a little he-haw with Mary Mag.

If you think that the Bible is 100% true, it would pay mind to remember that even the Dead Sea Scrolls are owned by and only tranlasted by Catholics, who throughout mid history would kill anyone with a different view; doesn't killing because of an opinion go against the Bible's teaching? They used the Bible as a way to govern and control a populus and get rich.

Truth is what (you make) people believe, not what necessarily actually is. President Bush does it all the time...
Posted by ASDF  on  Wed Mar 29, 2006  at  02:40 PM
I am currently readin Dan Brown's novel, The Davinci Code, and by the time i had finished the 40th chapter i was intruiged by the rumor that there were hidden "codes" in the painting. I went to the zoomable image that Simon Richard Clarkstone provided and my father and i picked through the markings in the background little by little. It is true that after a while, we seemed to see objects in every formation of paint. From seagulls to "grafitti style" letters. But, finally, we found a "mark" that unmistakibally resembles the sixteenth president of the united states - abraham lincoln. If you move the box in the zoomable image so that it is directly above the head of the disciple second from the left (the one with the blond hair) and zoom in, again, to the furthest degree, you can most definately see a man with a beard, significantly low ears ( a characteristic lincoln was famous for)wearing a union generals outfit from the american civil war and with his hand left in his pocket. you can almost make out the yellow bands on his shoulder, as those on american militia uniforms. also, i seemed to have noticed a demonic looking man peering around the table on the left side, in St. Bartholomew's robes, with very distinct facial features and a long beard. Perhaps, as Charybdis put it, it is simply "wishful thinking". maybe we see so much mystery in Da Vinci's work because we want to believe that there is something worth searching for. nevertheless, i, being a hopeful, see faces through the painting, mostly on the darker areas painted behind the table scene. and besides, the painting is large enough for Da Vinci to have been able to purposely hide the things people have found. In my opinion, he was a genius. I look up to him and his mysteriousness.
Posted by Anony.  on  Sat Apr 08, 2006  at  09:19 PM
Just curious as to why the guy on Jesus' left is pointing up and what the words are above everyone? I can't find a single site telling me what those words are. I know the finger pointing up thing is a part of Da Vinci's style, but I'm curious as to why the guy is pointing his finger up in this particular painting.

Also, there is a chance that the person on Jesus' right could be John. You decide.





John the Baptist



Also, Plato pointing his finger.
Plato
Posted by Brian  on  Thu Apr 20, 2006  at  08:58 PM

Oops, the Plato image got cut off.
Posted by Brian  on  Thu Apr 20, 2006  at  09:01 PM
To make it short:

http://home.arcor.de/berzelmayr/st-john.html
Posted by Batz  on  Sat Apr 22, 2006  at  01:12 AM
I found one of those websites where you can move around and zoom in on a picture (can't remember where). Turns out it wasn't a cup but part of the architecture. See for yourself.
Posted by Someone  on  Sun Apr 23, 2006  at  03:44 PM
I wrote a letter about three weeks ago which I apologise for because I didnt allow myself time to calm down before i tried to explain it. The letter was concerning the doorway found in the shafts of the queens chamber by rudolph gatenbrink with his robot upuaut. I am very new on the computer and I want to include the picture of the doorway but Ive tried everything and cant seem to do it so please take the time to see it because its definetely worth it. the picture can be seen when you type in upuaut project when you get to the sight click on the first one the upuaut story then there is a list and if you go to the one that says 1993 after that scroll down and you will see a picture of the door, Now after that scroll up to the enlarged last supper on this sight and youll see the same thing up on the wall above jesus right hand . now here is the shocker , i got a magnifying glass because i had to be certain and i was right. right above mary magdalines arm , if you look close you can clearly see the robot upuaut. thats all for now i have more to say about it but will wait for someone else to see it first. catherine
Posted by catherine higgs  on  Tue Apr 25, 2006  at  11:35 PM
"Just curious as to why the guy on Jesus' left is pointing up and what the words are above everyone? I can't find a single site telling me what those words are."
-- posted by Brian Apr. 20th

As far as I know, the stuff painted in the arched tympanum things aren't actually a part of "The Last Supper". The hall that has that painting in the end has these little shields and letters painted elsewhere along the top of its walls. I expect that they were painted by some other artist, perhaps in commemoration of something or another.

It's hard to see some of the letters, and I have no idea what they could be abbreviating, but here is what I can see of them. On the left side of the leftmost tympanum, from top to bottom, is "M", "SE", and "CO", and on the right side are "MX", "AN", and "PP". In the middle tympanum is "LV", "BE", "SE", and "DV", then "[possibly A]A", "[something]S[something]", and "AN". On the far right tympanum is painted "SF", "DVX", and then finally "AN" and "BA[possibly R or P]". I could be wrong on some of those letters; many are difficult to see. They remind me of the abbreviations for the names of saints that are often shown on religious icons, though.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed Apr 26, 2006  at  03:41 AM
Catherine Higgs, if you're talking about this white square with two black dots in it



then you have to keep in mind that that's not really what Da Vinci painted. What he painted looks more like this, in the restored version:



If you want a nice view of the restored painting, you can go to http://milano.arounder.com/category/fullscreen/IT000005356.html and look at it.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed Apr 26, 2006  at  03:57 AM
And here's where you're saying you see that robot:



And this is the robot:



I'm just not seeing it.
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed Apr 26, 2006  at  04:05 AM
yeah, well haven't you noticed the "m" that mary, yes mary, not peter...unless peter was gay,and jesus form?and yes.. i also believe that mary was the holy grail. not by the priory of sion either because it didn't exist till the 1930's.http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f118/magicalvampire/marymagdalene.jpg
Posted by laura  on  Mon May 08, 2006  at  08:07 AM
alright there buddy obviously its mary mag in the picture shes not the holy grail.your close but no cigar.The holy grail is something wanted by many,but most people dont even know what it is and what the priory of sion is,or why the knights of the teplars where killed and were trying to be wiped of the planet earth.they were protecting mary,but they also took secrets with them to there grave not reveiling where she was or the rest of the secrets of the bible.Lets just say this if the world truly honestly knew the truth.One the catholic church would have a fit,and life as we know it would never be the same. the secrets out there noone is just really looking or looking at the wrong spot.Iam just like you and others i want to know the truth. whats out there? who or what is really protecting us out here?Are we really going to heaven.Is what we are told since we were little true or false?Think about this We are told from a young age about God church the whole nine yards,now so are muslims,hindus,and everyother relegion out there.Now why are we right?and not them i was raised like most americans chistian beliefs,but why did christians persecute indians because they didnt believe in the same God.Our whole world revolves around God,and relegion wheter we want to believe it or not.
Posted by mmawhipnsnap  on  Mon May 08, 2006  at  03:57 PM
"yeah, well haven't you noticed the "m" that mary, yes mary, not peter...unless peter was gay,and jesus form?and yes.. i also believe that mary was the holy grail. not by the priory of sion either because it didn't exist till the 1930's."
-- posted by laura

Firstly: the picture doesn't form an "M". What it forms is



and you're simply taking an arbitrary section of that. You could also look elsewhere and say that the people at the table form the letter "W", "U", "I", "J", "L", "Z", "V", "C", or "N" quite easily, and make good cases for most of the other letters in the alphabet, too. And that's just going with the Roman alphabet; if you go into the Greek or Hebrew, you can find even more.

Secondly: even if it does form an "M", so what? Is that supposed to mean something?
Posted by Accipiter  on  Tue May 09, 2006  at  01:01 AM
I agree with you accipter the fact that it makes more then one letter and besides i dont even think that matters.It holds no significance.I think the picture was made to depict jesus in his last supper.The whole code thing is blown out of the water everything has a code then if you want to get technical.The only real code i see in these pictures is that mary magdeline was to his left.
Posted by mmawhipnsnap  on  Tue May 09, 2006  at  05:28 AM
The Holy Grail is a women, Mary Mangadlene, Jesus's wife
Posted by Da Vinceee  on  Tue May 09, 2006  at  11:46 AM
Wow, you'd think somebody else would have pointed this out before!

Oh wait, they did. I guess some people can't be bothered to read what came before them.

It's still a myth.
Posted by Charybdis  on  Tue May 09, 2006  at  12:00 PM
Heh, I think it's more of a case that some people believe everything they read.
Posted by Smerk  on  Tue May 09, 2006  at  07:08 PM
I believe you, Smerk!
Posted by Accipiter  on  Wed May 10, 2006  at  01:36 AM
Jesus had a daughter with mary magdeline.Thats what the holy grail is.the reason why its protected is because the catholic church along with many other relegions would be in jeoprady.The fact is that its the proof that jesus died with sin by having sex before marriage.THEREare a bunch of groups out there protecting this thats why not alot of people have heard it, but the truth is out there whether we believe it,or not.These secret groups are protecting something maybe its the bloodline of Jesus break down the word sangreal from back in the day.this is where the holy grail word comes from if you break the word in half as san greal it means holy grail now sang real means holy blood. look it up folks.I garentee that people will argue this till the day they die but you know what having faith is the number one reason why this country is as civilized as it is our laws are way of life.
Posted by mmawhipnsnap  on  Wed May 10, 2006  at  05:21 AM
Sorry...it still sounds too much like the back story to a popular fictional book to me.
Posted by Smerk  on  Wed May 10, 2006  at  05:58 AM
Comments: Page 1 of 3 pages  1 2 3 > 
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.