The Museum of Hoaxes
hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive
   
Hoaxes Throughout History
Middle AgesEarly Modern1700s1800-1840s1850-1890s
1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s21st Century2014
Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie
image I received the following email from Joe Mason. Instead of summarizing it, I'll just cut-and-paste the whole thing:

Amazon has a listing for "Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie". The book also has a homepage at http://www.hamsterhueypress.com/, and it's listed as being written by "renowned story teller" Mabel S. Barr.

Hamster Huey is, of course, the fictional book written by "Mabel Syrup" in Calvin and Hobbes. It looks like somebody with a vanity press has ripped off the title (I don't think titles are copyrightable, so this may even be legal). This version of "Hamster Huey" certainly isn't a "classic and much-beloved tale" as the publisher claims, so it's a hoax in that sense. I suspect it may go even deeper, and there is no actual book: "At Ms. Barr.s request, only a limited number of copies of this first edition are being printed, and Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie is sure to sell out soon." That's an easy excuse for not shipping a single copy.

So - is this a vanity press trying to pass off its book as a famous title? Or is someone having a chuckle by tricking Amazon into printing a fake book listing?


I guess the easiest thing to do would be to order the book and see what arrives, but since I don't want to spend the money my hunch would be that it's a real book that's a homage to (or inspired by) the fictional book from Calvin and Hobbes. Though I think there would be some intellectual property issues involved if the author of the book being sold on Amazon hadn't got the permission of the Calvin and Hobbes author. As for the issue about the 'limited number of copies', I think they're referring to copies of the first edition. Presumably they could print further editions if the first one sold out. But the real ripoff is that they're charging $7 for an 8-page paperback.
Literature/Language
Posted by The Curator on Wed Mar 23, 2005


Sorry guys. No video camera.

And I was referring to the "former fat guy" caias' offer to snort pepper. He said it was worth $3.75, so I figured doing it twice would be worth twice as much...

As for having previously snorted pepper, no.

But some jerk did stick habanero sauce on his finger and wipe it under my nose. Burned for days, dried my nose out, etc. Imagine getting dipped head-first into a drum of mace...

But habanero peppers ARE the strongest on the planet... You can't describe how hot they are to someone who has not tried them.
Posted by Rod  in  the land of smarties.  on  Fri Mar 25, 2005  at  09:30 AM
Possibly the illustrator:
http://www.artic.edu/webspaces/arttech2102/projects/nick_site/docs/homepage.html
Posted by Abinadab  on  Wed Apr 27, 2005  at  12:31 PM
The book is indeed real. I have a copy.

No one here has considered the possibility that Mr. Watterson is not the original inventor of Hamster Huey. He may have borrowed the idea from someone else (perhaps a storyteller friend?). In that case, the original author would be entitled to publish the work without needing to worry about copyright infringement.
Posted by Robo-Pup  in  Canada  on  Mon Sep 05, 2005  at  03:53 PM
Just as an update, this book/expensive pamphlet is still available from Amazon.com. The entertaining review is gone, unfortunately. The vast majority of the positive reviews seem to be from people who live in Gig Harbor or Port Orchard, Wash. (somehow, this isn't surprising in the least). As has been noted, http://www.hamsterhuey.com , http://www.hamsterhueypress.com are both registered to Paul Spadoni of Gig Harbor. And http://www.calvinandhobbesfanclub.com ? Lindsey Noelle (supposedly the webmistress) also apparently hails from Gig Harbor (as indicated by her glowing review of "Hamster" on Amazon.com), but not surprisingly, a WHOIS search reveals that the site is registered to (tada!) Paul Spadoni. I guess that explains why most of the "content" on the site revolves around promoting "Hamster Huey" - any actual Calvin & Hobbes content is just to set up the association - to falsely establish that this is indeed THE "Hamster Huey" of C&H fame.

What is now the firt (earliest) review on Amazon.com is written by a "Randall Spadoni" (hmm, think maybe he's related to Paul Spadoni?), in which he writes "FOR A STORY WRITTEN AROUND A TITLE, this one's pretty good." [my emphasis]. There you have it, folks!
Posted by Ian  in  Seattle  on  Mon Oct 02, 2006  at  12:13 AM
Those who claim that the title "Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooey" cannot be legally protected are mistaken although there is some latitude in the law which allows for satire and parody of otherwise copyrighted works. But I don't think this could be seen to fall into that exception. It does not sell itself as a parody of Watterson's work but rather attempts to pass itself off as the very thing Watterson invented (even though he only invetned the title). It is clearly a blatant ripoff trying to cash in on the success and exposure afforded the name in its original context. Imagine for a moment that the Obi Wan Kenobi character in the original Star Wars movie told Luke about a book of Jedi History called, for arguments sake, the "Jedi Chronicles of Alderon Five" (he didn't but just imagine he did) and someone then writes an actual book in the real world called "The Jedi Chronicles of Alderon Five". Do you think they would get very far before the legal might of the Lucas empire squashed them flat? I doubt it. How is it any different with Watterson's invented book name?
The intention of intellectual property law is to reserve the right of commercial exploitation of a fictional invention to the person who can validly assert a unique right over such invention. Mr Waterson both invented the title "Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooey" and has asserted his rights by claiming copyright over the Calvin and Hobbes comics in which the references to Hamster Huey appear. The only limitation on such protections (aside from the parody/satire reference) is the extent to which the invented name is in fact generic and consequently not an "invention" at all. To avoid risks of the former most new products adopt an entirely invented name. While the words "hamster" and "huey" on their own are generic the entire made up book title is most certainly not. Consequently that title is as susceptible to protection as are the graphical representations of Calvin and Hobbes themselves.
Posted by Richard Quinn  in  Australia  on  Thu Jan 04, 2007  at  01:37 AM
Hey, take it easy, guys. I know the author of the book. He's a great guy who loves Calvin and Hobbes and just thought it would be fun to make up a story based on the title of Calvin's favorite book. He spent a lot of money printing the book on his own and having a local artist put together some pictures. The point of making the book was not about money. The book was supposed to be a quirky idea for Calvin enthusiasts. Unfortunately, it seems to have generated more ire than nostalgia.
Posted by Scott  in  Washington, D.C.  on  Thu Nov 01, 2007  at  08:11 PM
It is clearly a blatant ripoff trying to cash in on the success and exposure afforded the name in its original context. Imagine for a moment that the Obi Wan Kenobi character in the original Star Wars movie
Posted by zhuzhu hamster  in  manila  on  Tue Dec 15, 2009  at  09:14 PM
Comments: Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
Commenting is no longer available in this channel entry.
All text Copyright © 2014 by Alex Boese, except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.