The Museum of Hoaxes
hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive hoax archive
Hoaxes Throughout History
Middle AgesEarly Modern1700s1800-1840s1850-1890s
1900s1910s1920s1930s1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s21st Century2014
The Woman Who Gave Birth to a Frog
The BBC is reporting that a woman in Iran has given birth to a frog. Doctors are speculating that a frog larva somehow got into her uterus while she was swimming, and then grew inside her to a full-sized frog. That seems very unlikely to me. What would a frog feed on inside a person's body? Wouldn't the frog suffocate? Actually, the brief article seems a bit ambiguous on whether it's definitely a frog that came out of her, or if it's a baby that looks rather frog-like. Either way, this case immediately reminded me of Mary Toft, the 18th-century English woman who gave birth to rabbits. Of course, Mary Toft didn't really give birth to rabbits. She stuffed rabbits inside herself and then pretended to give birth to them. It seems possible this Iranian woman is pulling a Mary Toft.
Posted by The Curator on Sun Jun 27, 2004

You need a fourth choice in your survey: "The story is nonsense."

BTW, a "frog larva" is a tadpole. They live on algae. No, they couldn't survive inside a human uterus.
Posted by Carl Fink  on  Mon Jun 28, 2004  at  08:31 AM
The article I read about this was obscure and confusing. A part of it suggests it was a child with frog like features.

Anyway, a picture would be nice to get a better idea.
Posted by The Mexx  on  Mon Jun 28, 2004  at  12:07 PM
Life rabbits?
Posted by Chipo  in  eindhoven  on  Mon Jun 28, 2004  at  06:41 PM
this reminded me of X-files series. well Carl if it really was crap it wouldn't go on bbc. there is definately some thing about this story, some thing real that's not being told to every one.
Posted by maryann  on  Tue Jun 29, 2004  at  06:11 AM
The BBC is reporting that "An Iranian newspaper has reported...".

The BBC does have a sense of humour/the absurd
Posted by Peter  in  London  on  Tue Jun 29, 2004  at  06:19 AM
Is this the same BBC who reported the 49-foot python, Winston Churchill's parrot and the man with foot and mouth disease (who was even interviewed on the radio)?
Posted by Lawrence Mayes  in  UK  on  Tue Jun 29, 2004  at  08:10 AM
quoth the beeb (with a serious demeanor that would do The Enquirer proud):
"While it is unclear how this could have happened..."

and it is accompanied by a picture of a frog (captioned "Tests are being carried out on the frog"), implying this is the frog to which the woman gave birth.

You have to love the way the bbc both distances themselves from the story (An Iraninan newspaper has reported....) and endorses it (by repeating it).

Thanks be to Allah, the blogosphere (with a little google-help) finds the origin of the photo:

credited to Peter Morgan, Reuters.

Unanswered questions (and, in the Beeb story, unasked) include how an Iranian woman gave birth to a Chinese Gliding Frog (distribution according to the Amphibian Species of the World database {search on Polypedates dennysi} is "Southern China west to Sichuan and Guizhou; Myanmar; expected in adjacent Vietnam") or how the particular animial she bore came to be on display in the exhibit "Frogs!" at the American Museum of Natural History in New York
Posted by David  on  Wed Jun 30, 2004  at  02:59 AM
I forwarded this story to some women when it first appeared on BBC. I reminded them all that you are only supposed to kiss the damn frog not, well, you know, get THAT familiar with it. Frog babies probably bring great joy but, a word to the wise, you will get a reputation for being a huge slut and of being an advocate for interspecies dating/mating, a practice frowned upon even here in MA. Dirty pool, indeed!
Posted by sheila hines  in  boston, MA  on  Sun Jul 11, 2004  at  03:30 PM
This has got to be the biggest load of nonsence i have ever heard- if it was real it would have created much more of a stir and America would probably have gained a Blockuster movie out of it. It could have been called Manfrog the Early Days or something.
Posted by Becky Hughes  in  Altrincham  on  Wed Sep 08, 2004  at  12:09 PM
Belated comment: I notice that the picture of the supposed frog-baby from the original Eternaad story (saved here at Stinky Journalism) is itself a fabrication. It's an image of a one-legged frog from the website of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Posted by Ray Girvan  in  Topsham, Devon  on  Fri Sep 24, 2004  at  07:42 AM
Oops! "Etemaad", not "Eternaad".
Posted by Ray Girvan  on  Fri Sep 24, 2004  at  07:44 AM
i think this article may clear this question up:

the iranian woman was a little "lonely" and got caught. you have to read quite a bit of the article to get to the relevent section.
Posted by bugbear sloth  in  earth  on  Sun Oct 17, 2004  at  07:41 AM
Posted by Maegan  in  Tampa, FL - USA  on  Tue Nov 16, 2004  at  03:34 PM
This is actually caused by chemical disease and exposure to a certain chemical. There have been cases of this in Texas in relation to the Maquiladoras factories.
Posted by Brendan Strain  in  USA  on  Mon Feb 19, 2007  at  09:28 PM
Commenting is no longer available in this channel entry.
All text Copyright © 2014 by Alex Boese, except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.