The Bible clearly says the earth is a circle... in English… just like it has for centuries…
Of course, Isaiah was around in something like the 8th century BC, and the English language was a tad scarce at that time in history. The older versions of Isaiah were written in Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Coptic, or other such languages. And looking at my Greek and Hebrew versions of it (I really ought to see about replacing my former copy of one of the old Latin versions of it, perhaps the old 4th century AD Vulgate version; does anybody here have a Catholic Bible, in Latin, so that they can provide the Latin version of it?), they aren’t saying anything about the Earth being a circle. Looking at the much, much later English versions of it (they first went into English thousands of years after the original version were made), even many of them don’t say “circle”. All those versions are talking about a curved ceiling over the Earth, like a dome.
It is only in a very small and late minority of versions of Isaiah that it says, “It is He that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers” (to quote the King James version) or, “He sitteth enthroned above the circle of the earth and its people are like grasshoppers” (as the NIV says). That’s because back when they were trying to decide how to translate from the Latin of St. Jerome and the Hebrew of the Masoretic texts and all those other languages, they chose to use the word “circle” to indicate the dome over the world, and the word choice was carried through in later versions. And you’ll notice that even in those versions it’s saying the circle of the earth, and not the Earth is a circle. That’s like the difference between saying “the candy bar of the man” and “the man is a candy bar”.
Incidentally, you do realise that circles are two-dimensional, don’t you?
even through the centuries men like you said “it’s flat”.
Not all that many people actually thought that the world was flat. And certainly very few people of any learning.
Also, I’m Still Waiting for that Diagram of the Earth/Venus conjuncion.
The paltry, placebo, diagram you posted couldn’t fool your retarded sister.
He gave it to you. It was quite clear. It was also far more accurate than the one you provided, as it was based on the actual observed orbits rather than the rough approximation that you forced the orbits into to provide your pentagram.
So… for the rest of us who actually want to learn something…I have updated the website
I look forward to perusing your information. . .