1 of 3
1
9/11 or Princess Diana?
Posted: 22 August 2007 02:15 PM   [ Ignore ]
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  13
Joined  2007-08-15

Which conspiracy theory has more legs, 9/11 being an inside job or the US having involvement in the assassination of Princes Diana?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2007 02:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  26043
Joined  2004-11-08

I think the CIA had Diana murdered because she was plotting 9/11.  All the facts speak for themselves, if you just open your minds.

 Signature 

Heaven must be really boring, if you think about it logically.
All the angels must be snoring.  Who could stand perfection for eternity?

Not me. - George Hrab

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2007 02:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  56862
Joined  2005-02-10
Charybdis - 22 August 2007 06:22 PM

I think the CIA had Diana murdered because she was plotting 9/11.  All the facts speak for themselves, if you just open your minds.

Plus, the facts were on Wiki. Until the CIA edited it…
wink

 Signature 

2-15-15 9-19 1 19-16-15-18-11 7-15-4-4-5-19-19 15-6 13-9-7-8-20
Turnip Boris Yeltsin frog juggling doormat termite lizard

“Herbal medicine’s been around for thousands of years! Indeed it has. And then we tested it all, and the stuff that worked became medicine. And the rest of it’s just a nice bowl of soup and some pot pourri.” - Dara O’Briain

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2007 05:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8165
Joined  2005-02-06

9/11 was MI6’s retaliation for the assassination of Princess Diana by the CIA. Al-Qaeda is related to the Al-Fayed and MI6 is behind it.

The CIA then tried to hit back, first by the Madrid bombings (because they were under the mistaken impression that since Gibraltar is British, the rest of Iberia must be too, and Madrid had a tube while Gibraltar has not), and then they corrected themselves by means of the London Tube bombings.

Next they poisoned Litvinenko in order to upset British-Russian relationships.

 Signature 

———
The Kruger-Dunning effect is rampant on internet fora.
J. Kruger & D. Dunning (1999), Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 77, 1121-1134

Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 August 2007 07:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7356
Joined  2005-06-23
LaMa - 22 August 2007 09:41 PM

9/11 was MI6’s retaliation for the assassination of Princess Diana by the CIA. Al-Qaeda is related to the Al-Fayed and MI6 is behind it.

The CIA then tried to hit back, first by the Madrid bombings (because they were under the mistaken impression that since Gibraltar is British, the rest of Iberia must be too, and Madrid had a tube while Gibraltar has not), and then they corrected themselves by means of the London Tube bombings.

Next they poisoned Litvinenko in order to upset British-Russian relationships.


I suppose those failed car bombings in June were their work too?

Bastards.

 Signature 

“We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation.”
- Voltaire

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 04:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  13
Joined  2007-08-15

clever responses guys… but seriously… the reason I ask is because I’ve noticed a lot more coverage on her death rather than 9/11… both were awhile ago.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 04:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  56862
Joined  2005-02-10

Yeah, but isn’t it the ten year ‘anniversary’ of her death at the end of this month?
That explains a lot of it.

 Signature 

2-15-15 9-19 1 19-16-15-18-11 7-15-4-4-5-19-19 15-6 13-9-7-8-20
Turnip Boris Yeltsin frog juggling doormat termite lizard

“Herbal medicine’s been around for thousands of years! Indeed it has. And then we tested it all, and the stuff that worked became medicine. And the rest of it’s just a nice bowl of soup and some pot pourri.” - Dara O’Briain

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 04:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8452
Joined  2006-02-28
bingster - 23 August 2007 08:29 PM

clever responses guys… but seriously… the reason I ask is because I’ve noticed a lot more coverage on her death rather than 9/11… both were awhile ago.

Let’s see…

2,974 plain ordinary people or one beautiful princess (and her driver & bodyguard/boyfriend)... which one do you think the media would focus on bingster? 

WTC was September 11th (2001)...
Diana’s death was August 31 (1997)...

So both are timely right about now - especially if the news media needs a filler story… some fluff.

edit: Great point Boo!

 Signature 

Life is what happens when you are busy making other plans. - John Lennon
You can twist perceptions, reality won’t budge. - Rush

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 06:42 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8165
Joined  2005-02-06
Boo - 23 August 2007 08:33 PM

Yeah, but isn’t it the ten year ‘anniversary’ of her death at the end of this month?
That explains a lot of it.

That, plus the release of the new Metropolitan Police research report half a year ago.

 Signature 

———
The Kruger-Dunning effect is rampant on internet fora.
J. Kruger & D. Dunning (1999), Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 77, 1121-1134

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 07:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3763
Joined  2007-06-07

Unaired Princess Di interview to air: http://www.worldscreen.com/newscurrent.php?filename=lifetime081607.htm

Oooh, Martin Bashir! He interviewed Michael Jackson!

With a 10 year anniversary, of course things are going to get rehashed. I would say 9/11 is bigger because it never really leaves the limelight.

New stories are constantly using the tagline “since 9/11” and it never really dies down or is gone from the media. Whereas the Princess Di debacle really dropped off quite a bit and has been brought back up.

 Signature 

Today is the day you worried about yesterday, and all is well…Except that the well is dry, the toilet is overflowing and a flock of meese just pooped in your back yard…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 07:49 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8165
Joined  2005-02-06
Transfrmr - 23 August 2007 11:00 PM

Unaired Princess Di interview to air: http://www.worldscreen.com/newscurrent.php?filename=lifetime081607.htm

Oooh, Martin Bashir! He interviewed Michael Jackson!

With a 10 year anniversary, of course things are going to get rehashed. I would say 9/11 is bigger because it never really leaves the limelight.

New stories are constantly using the tagline “since 9/11” and it never really dies down or is gone from the media. Whereas the Princess Di debacle really dropped off quite a bit and has been brought back up.

This is also dependant on where in the world you are. Here in Europe 9/11 is less of a omni-present theme than in the USA.

 Signature 

———
The Kruger-Dunning effect is rampant on internet fora.
J. Kruger & D. Dunning (1999), Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 77, 1121-1134

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 August 2007 08:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7356
Joined  2005-06-23

I really, really don’t care about Princess Diana.

But I do think there’s a lot more conspiracy theories about Diana than there are about September the 11th.

 Signature 

“We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation.”
- Voltaire

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 3
1