1 of 1
Drinking 4.5 to 8 litres of anything isn´t healthy
Posted: 20 April 2012 10:06 AM   [ Ignore ]
Five Star Member
Total Posts:  5155
Joined  2005-01-27

The sister of a woman whose partner claimed she died because she drank too much Coca-Cola says she does not hold the company responsible.

However, the woman’s partner and mother-in-law say warning labels should be put on the drink.

An inquest for mother-of-eight Natasha Harris was held in Invercargill yesterday. Harris died on February 25, 2010.

Otago-Southland coroner David Crerar did not make any preliminary findings after yesterday’s inquest, however pathologist Dan Mornin said he believed Harris died of cardiac arrhythmia and it was likely she was suffering from hypokalemia (low potassium) along with caffeine toxicity, which could have contributed to her death.

When asked by Crerar whether it was probable her consumption of Coca-Cola had caused the hypokalemia and arrhythmia, Dr Mornin said yes, along with poor nutrition and caffeine.

At the inquest, Harris’ partner, Chris Hodgkinson, said his partner consumed between 4.5 and 8 litres of Coke a day for several years before her death, and he believed this had contributed to her death.

His mother, Vivien Hodgkinson said after the inquest that warning labels should be put on Coke products.

However, Harris’ sister Raelene Finlayson yesterday said no-one had forced her sister to drink the Coke, and she did not hold Coca-Cola responsible for her death. “Nobody forced Tasha to drink all that ... it’s like anything, we all know anything in moderation is okay,” she said.

The last time she saw her sister, about a week before her death, she had looked unwell, Finlayson said. She told her she should see a doctor, but her sister put her children before herself.

“They didn’t live the best lives, but Tasha always put those kids first. They never went without food or anything like that.”

In a statement issued after the inquest, Coca-Cola Oceania public affairs and communication manager Karen Thompson, who also attended the inquest yesterday, said the safety of the company’s products was paramount.

“We concur with the information shared by the coroner’s office that the grossly excessive ingestion of any food product, including water, over a short period of time with the inadequate consumption of essential nutrients, and the failure to seek appropriate medical intervention when needed, can be dramatically symptomatic.

“We believe that all foods and beverages can have a place in a balanced and sensible diet combined with an active lifestyle,” the statement says.

The company’s thoughts were with the Hodgkinson family, but as the coroner had not yet issued findings into Harris’ death, it was not appropriate for Coca-Cola to comment further, it says.

At the inquest, Hodgkinson said he found his partner slumped against a wall after she called out to him. Ambulance staff were unable to revive her, he said.

Too much of any liquid can be deadly

Drinking up to eight litres of any liquid a day can kill you, regardless of how much sugar or caffeine it contains, a Wellington dietician says.

Foodsavvy’s Sarah Elliott said that when “extreme” amounts of fluid were consumed regularly, the body’s cells could rupture.

“Ten litres of fluid a day could kill you, no matter what it is.”

Specialists recommend that humans do not drink more than four litres of liquid a day. Natasha Harris’s daily intake of Coca-Cola would have given her up to a “shocking” 3424 calories and 864 grams (or 3 1/2 cups) of sugar, Elliott said.

Also, the combination of caffeine and sugar encouraged addiction, and soft drinks were shown to make bones thinner and cause osteoporosis.

Elliott had one client whose five-litre-a-day Coke addiction had led to sweating and problems with his weight, skin and teeth.

There were problems when someone with an addictive personality was faced with choosing between cheap soft drinks and more-expensive healthy ones, Elliott said.

“Addictions are serious and she [Harris] would have needed therapy to get through that, and would not have been able to just stop.”




“By the sweat on our brows, and the strengths of our backs…Gentlemen. Hoist the Colours! And you, madam, I warn you, I know the entire Geneva Convention by heart!”
Trust me.

Posted: 20 April 2012 10:18 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Five Star Member
Total Posts:  6943
Joined  2005-10-21

. . . Warning labels. . . for over-drinking. . . Argh. . . brain hurts.

*pounds head on table*


1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsibility to disprove your claims, but rather your responsibility to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Posted: 20 April 2012 02:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Five Star Member
Total Posts:  2904
Joined  2005-06-15

As mentioned in this story she was vomiting a lot before she died

Natasha had been unwell for a year before her death in 2010, including vomiting six times a week and extreme tiredness.

Dr Dan Mornin told the court the mum probably had severe hypokalemia – a potentially fatal lack of potassium in the blood – as a result of downing too many soft drinks.

Coke contains caffeine and the doctor said excessive amounts of the stimulant were the likely cause of Natasha’s vomiting.

It seems incredible she didn’t put two and two together and attributed the vomiting to drinking too much coke. Most people would know in that situation to cut down on drinking coke, without needing any warning on a label.


I’m not some ordinary moron.
I’m an Oxy-Moron!

Mental Giant: A very tall person who is more than slightly confused.

Posted: 20 April 2012 11:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Five Star Member
Total Posts:  61098
Joined  2005-04-14
Peter - 20 April 2012 02:19 PM

It seems incredible she didn’t put two and two together and attributed the vomiting to drinking too much coke. Most people would know in that situation to cut down on drinking coke, without needing any warning on a label.

That’s the problem with addictions:  the addict has a hard time approaching the problem rationally.  They tend to make all sorts of excuses and rationalisations.  Plus there tend to be all sorts of horrible physical and psychological effects from trying to stop, making trying to quit even more unpleasant (in the short term, at least) than are the problems caused by continuing.


“If any man wish to write in a clear style, let him be first clear in his thoughts.”

1 of 1