1 of 1
Ever noticed the newspaper in a sitcom?
Posted: 19 June 2010 06:39 AM   [ Ignore ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5152
Joined  2005-01-27

 Signature 


“By the sweat on our brows, and the strengths of´╗┐ our backs…Gentlemen. Hoist the Colours! And you, madam, I warn you, I know the entire Geneva Convention by heart!”
Trust me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 June 2010 06:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2899
Joined  2005-06-15

Are these different sitcoms or the same one?

 Signature 

I’m not some ordinary moron.
I’m an Oxy-Moron!

Mental Giant: A very tall person who is more than slightly confused.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 June 2010 07:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  26371
Joined  2004-11-29

I recognise one, maybe two sitcoms out of the montage, and that’s “That 70’s Show” and possibly “Married, With Children”.  So, different shows.

 Signature 

Remember, a Dragon is for life!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 June 2010 07:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  10733
Joined  2008-02-21

Wow. that’s pretty odd all right. LOL

And Peter, esch pic is from a different show, though they are all apparently reading the same newspaper! LOL

 Signature 

“Always, I Do What Is Necessary” - Rissa Kerguelen
Go to my Blog. It’s lonely.

I Am Still The Black Swan Of Trespass On Alien Waters
To the believer no proof is required; to the skeptic no proof is sufficient.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 19 June 2010 11:14 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6932
Joined  2005-10-21

Thought there was already a post on this..

Yeah, it’s something of a Wilhelm Scream for TV. That’s an actual paper from the mid-60s. Note the shocking lack of advertisements.

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2010 02:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  208
Joined  2009-12-31

Thats what happens when film producers get articles of the paper from google images.
lol

 Signature 

Cryptids On Land Are Easier To Hunt Than Those In Sea And Air.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2010 02:18 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Five Star Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6932
Joined  2005-10-21

Actually, some of those images predate Google, and in the case of Married with Children, widespread useage of the intenet. No, it’s a case of an ‘inside joke’ among the props department.

 Signature 

1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. If it does what it says, you should have no problem with this.
2: What proof will you accept that you are wrong? You ask us to change our mind, but we cannot change yours?
3: It is not our responsability to disprove your claims, but rather your responsability to prove them.
4. Personal testamonials are not proof.

What part of ‘meow’ don’t you understand?

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 1